Men needed to enforce Rule of Law. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/07/25/men-needed-to-enforce-rule-of-law/
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-25 18:05:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287086661407346689
Men needed to enforce Rule of Law. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/07/25/men-needed-to-enforce-rule-of-law/
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-25 18:05:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287086661407346689
Men needed to enforce Rule of Law. https://t.co/SdnTOuPHYT
—“Rule of Law is only sustainable when a sufficient body of high Agency men federate together to protect their commons from being undermined. … Therefore we must ensure that our commons is producing a sufficient number of capable and incentivized men as needed to enforce Rule of Law. “—Noah J Revoy
—“Rule of Law is only sustainable when a sufficient body of high Agency men federate together to protect their commons from being undermined. … Therefore we must ensure that our commons is producing a sufficient number of capable and incentivized men as needed to enforce Rule of Law. “—Noah J Revoy
War, Law, Faith – P Is a Language of Law, Not Faith (or War) https://t.co/mdBoqhajp8
War, Law, Faith – P Is a Language of Law, Not Faith (or War) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/07/25/war-law-faith-p-is-a-language-of-law-not-faith-or-war/
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-25 17:45:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287081651206385664
—“I recommend that you emphasize that P is a legal language and not a religious or metaphysical language, as a part of the attempt to bridge with the more religious side. Make them understand the distinction… They’re not offered a religious frame but they’re not denied their own preference as long as it doesn’t break the bounds of reciprocity. I would constantly put that out in front. It’s a secular legal language. Your religion isn’t actively catered to but nor is it denied or prevented (within the bounds of reciprocity).”– William Wallace
1. Deliver unto alexander (war),2. Deliver unto Caesar (law),3. Deliver unto god(faith) Unfortunately for the faithful, that is the correct order. War, Law, Faith. Why? Dependency.
—“I recommend that you emphasize that P is a legal language and not a religious or metaphysical language, as a part of the attempt to bridge with the more religious side. Make them understand the distinction… They’re not offered a religious frame but they’re not denied their own preference as long as it doesn’t break the bounds of reciprocity. I would constantly put that out in front. It’s a secular legal language. Your religion isn’t actively catered to but nor is it denied or prevented (within the bounds of reciprocity).”– William Wallace
1. Deliver unto alexander (war),2. Deliver unto Caesar (law),3. Deliver unto god(faith) Unfortunately for the faithful, that is the correct order. War, Law, Faith. Why? Dependency.
How does that right exist? What evidence is there that it exists? A Right requires a means of enforcement. Who enforces it – and does anyone?
Rights don’t exist. We must make them. We make them by forming norms, laws, institutions to create and enforce them.
And they’re RARE.
Reply addressees: @clickKunst @IamBradC @JulieBorowski
How does that right exist? What evidence is there that it exists? A Right requires a means of enforcement. Who enforces it – and does anyone?
Rights don’t exist. We must make them. We make them by forming norms, laws, institutions to create and enforce them.
And they’re RARE.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-25 16:04:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287056034629124098
Reply addressees: @clickKunst @IamBradC @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287024071092314113