In the near future, we are going to criminalize such lying:
1) Not including vandalism looting as violence, or dramatic related increase in violence.
2) Stating ‘white supremacists’ are provocateurs, rather than ANTIFA using BLM as human shields.
3) BLM/ANTIFA co-organized/funded
Reply addressees: @ACLEDINFO @ajplus @timcraigpost @_RichardHall @MazMHussain @michelleinbklyn @Sulliview @peterwsinger @RawyaRageh
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
In the near future, we are going to criminalize such lying: 1) Not including van
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @Jyrkiboy_ @wax5800 @MD11dr @jimkelly522 @RealJamesWoods MASC
RT @curtdoolittle: @Jyrkiboy_ @wax5800 @MD11dr @jimkelly522 @RealJamesWoods MASCULINE: Right Capitalization = Rule of Law (calculable), Pro…
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-03 17:00:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1301565672485519360
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @Jyrkiboy_ @wax5800 @MD11dr @jimkelly522 @RealJamesWoods MASC
RT @curtdoolittle: @Jyrkiboy_ @wax5800 @MD11dr @jimkelly522 @RealJamesWoods MASCULINE: Right Capitalization = Rule of Law (calculable), Pro…
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @jimkelly522 @Jyrkiboy_ @wax5800 @MD11dr @RealJamesWoods Beca
RT @curtdoolittle: @jimkelly522 @Jyrkiboy_ @wax5800 @MD11dr @RealJamesWoods Because (by design) between the 19th c American jurists, and th…
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @jimkelly522 @Jyrkiboy_ @wax5800 @MD11dr @RealJamesWoods Beca
RT @curtdoolittle: @jimkelly522 @Jyrkiboy_ @wax5800 @MD11dr @RealJamesWoods Because (by design) between the 19th c American jurists, and th…
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-03 16:59:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1301565618248916992
-
Because (by design) between the 19th c American jurists, and the enemy, both hav
Because (by design) between the 19th c American jurists, and the enemy, both have attempted to create ‘positive law’ by repeating constitutional falsehoods in order to end western rule of law. So the population doesn’t know what it means, so he can’t talk about it.
Reply addressees: @jimkelly522 @Jyrkiboy_ @wax5800 @MD11dr @RealJamesWoods -
Because (by design) between the 19th c American jurists, and the enemy, both hav
Because (by design) between the 19th c American jurists, and the enemy, both have attempted to create ‘positive law’ by repeating constitutional falsehoods in order to end western rule of law. So the population doesn’t know what it means, so he can’t talk about it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-03 16:46:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1301562117280104449
Reply addressees: @jimkelly522 @Jyrkiboy_ @wax5800 @MD11dr @RealJamesWoods
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1301561804133404672
-
Most cases are decided by sympathy and empathy: tests of subjectivity incentives
Most cases are decided by sympathy and empathy: tests of subjectivity incentives. These are not determined by facts but by predictions that construct something between an intuition and an imaginary narrative from very few facts if any. Lie detection would be far more useful.
Reply addressees: @judicialist -
Most cases are decided by sympathy and empathy: tests of subjectivity incentives
Most cases are decided by sympathy and empathy: tests of subjectivity incentives. These are not determined by facts but by predictions that construct something between an intuition and an imaginary narrative from very few facts if any. Lie detection would be far more useful.
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-26 17:08:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1298668586790203394
Reply addressees: @judicialist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1298634830851256321
-
It’s just a difference in point of view. I try to maintain the observer point of
It’s just a difference in point of view. I try to maintain the observer point of view (empiricist). So, the individual experiences and calculates risk. The state and the law seek to reduce frictions (risks) in pursuit of economic velocity (productivity).
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11