correct. ergo ‘we need a bible, or book of law that is ‘sacred’ as was our constitution but less vulnerable.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-08 00:51:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303133740609294336
Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303130316756877313
correct. ergo ‘we need a bible, or book of law that is ‘sacred’ as was our constitution but less vulnerable.
Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus
5) So the usual solution is (a) have a war, (b) hope you win (c) copy the french revolution and Chinese, perform a thorough purge, (d) update the constitution and therefore common knowledge, so that (e) it doesn’t happen again.
(I just wanted to do it systematically. lol)
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-08 00:26:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303127520217366533
Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303126766874243072
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DudeMaximus 4) The problem was (as I’ve stated in the new constitutional recommendations) the founders didn’t even state anything about our civilization and our common law, or its foundations in the constitution and only poetically in the declaration. So how do you demarcate debate vs fraud?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1303126766874243072
5) So the usual solution is (a) have a war, (b) hope you win (c) copy the french revolution and Chinese, perform a thorough purge, (d) update the constitution and therefore common knowledge, so that (e) it doesn’t happen again.
(I just wanted to do it systematically. lol)
Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus
4) The problem was (as I’ve stated in the new constitutional recommendations) the founders didn’t even state anything about our civilization and our common law, or its foundations in the constitution and only poetically in the declaration. So how do you demarcate debate vs fraud?
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-08 00:23:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303126766874243072
Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303126311423094786
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DudeMaximus 3) Realistically, the pagans protected against it. The church protected against it. The monarchies did. The pre-war countries did. Other countries protect against it. And they use our ‘openness’ exploit this vulnerability in our civilization. …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1303126311423094786
4) The problem was (as I’ve stated in the new constitutional recommendations) the founders didn’t even state anything about our civilization and our common law, or its foundations in the constitution and only poetically in the declaration. So how do you demarcate debate vs fraud?
Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus
2) … outside the constitutional framework, because that framework was constrained by guarantees (a) freedom of speech even if fraudulent and harmful, (b) freedom of religion, even if pseudoscientific and harmful, (c) and treason, sedition, and defamation, undermined postwar.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-08 00:19:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303125793468489728
Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1303124325080457216
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DudeMaximus Great question. A thorough answer would be time-consuming. Short answer, which won’t quite help, is that:
1) the ((())) left’s reformation of supernatural Abrahamism into a pseudoscientific religion, and repetition of the destruction of Rome (Germany, Russia) from within, is ..
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1303124325080457216
2) … outside the constitutional framework, because that framework was constrained by guarantees (a) freedom of speech even if fraudulent and harmful, (b) freedom of religion, even if pseudoscientific and harmful, (c) and treason, sedition, and defamation, undermined postwar.
Reply addressees: @DudeMaximus
Correct.
The White Law(Rules) < Military (defense) < Militia (order) < Sherrif ( Civil ) < Police (‘Crime’) < Individual (‘norms’) Where the sherrifs work for the constitution, and the police the jurisdiction.Updated Sep 6, 2020, 10:00 AM
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-05 14:07:00 UTC
In the near future, we are going to criminalize such lying:
1) Not including vandalism looting as violence, or dramatic related increase in violence.
2) Stating ‘white supremacists’ are provocateurs, rather than ANTIFA using BLM as human shields.
3) BLM/ANTIFA co-organized/funded
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-04 23:23:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1302024452172058626
Reply addressees: @ACLEDINFO @ajplus @timcraigpost @_RichardHall @MazMHussain @michelleinbklyn @Sulliview @peterwsinger @RawyaRageh
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1301897036799901696