RT @curtdoolittle: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul Failure of due diligence is the primary purpose of tort law, and tort law is the foundation of all o…
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
RT @curtdoolittle: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul Failure of due diligence is the primary p
RT @curtdoolittle: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul Failure of due diligence is the primary purpose of tort law, and tort law is the foundation of all o…
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-12 16:08:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315685678756384769
-
Failure of due diligence is the primary purpose of tort law, and tort law is the
Failure of due diligence is the primary purpose of tort law, and tort law is the foundation of all organized civilizations.
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul -
Failure of due diligence is the primary purpose of tort law, and tort law is the
Failure of due diligence is the primary purpose of tort law, and tort law is the foundation of all organized civilizations.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-12 16:07:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315685648821563396
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315684126993854467
-
Philosophy = You may (via positive w/ threat of loss of opportunity) Theology =
Philosophy = You may (via positive w/ threat of loss of opportunity)
Theology = You should (via positive w/ threat of ostracizatin)
Law = You must (via negative w/ threat of harm)
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4 -
Philosophy = You may (via positive w/ threat of loss of opportunity) Theology =
Philosophy = You may (via positive w/ threat of loss of opportunity)
Theology = You should (via positive w/ threat of ostracizatin)
Law = You must (via negative w/ threat of harm)
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 15:03:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312770438376943616
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312750542335041536
-
This is the net reason against theocracy (individual, personal, via-positiva), j
This is the net reason against theocracy (individual, personal, via-positiva), just as it is the net reason for rule of law (collective impersonal, via-negativa).
I suppose I should harden this argument analytically since as you’ve indirectly suggested it’s point of demarcation.
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4 -
This is the net reason against theocracy (individual, personal, via-positiva), j
This is the net reason against theocracy (individual, personal, via-positiva), just as it is the net reason for rule of law (collective impersonal, via-negativa).
I suppose I should harden this argument analytically since as you’ve indirectly suggested it’s point of demarcation.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 14:58:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312769190445621248
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312750542335041536
-
Correct. Great question. When it ceases to be personal, voluntary, normative (in
Correct. Great question. When it ceases to be personal, voluntary, normative (informal) individually empirical and accountable, and is applied instead, to political, involuntary, material, and unaccountable (formal). Religion=personal individual vs State=impersonal aggregate. https://t.co/R5oJkewMjg
-
Correct. Great question. When it ceases to be personal, voluntary, normative (in
Correct. Great question. When it ceases to be personal, voluntary, normative (informal) individually empirical and accountable, and is applied instead, to political, involuntary, material, and unaccountable (formal). Religion=personal individual vs State=impersonal aggregate. https://twitter.com/bishkebab4/status/1312750542335041536
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 14:56:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312768563975983105