FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a violation of positive law (authority). Why the dispute? The constitution presumes Natural Law (reciprocity).
The people have been intentionally deceived by you and yours.
“No more pilpul (lies).”
Reply addressees: @mattyglesias
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a viola
-
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a viola
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a violation of positive law (authority). Why the dispute? The constitution presumes Natural Law (reciprocity).
The people have been intentionally deceived by you and yours.
“No more pilpul (lies).”
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 13:00:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316000922183630849
Reply addressees: @mattyglesias
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315995271994707968
-
I mean, if instead of a supernatural church with supernatural justification of n
I mean, if instead of a supernatural church with supernatural justification of natural law functioning as the Supreme Court between the states over an intentionally illiterate population, we had Aristotelian natural law Supreme Court doing the same with a literate population? https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1315735046255513601
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-12 20:26:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315750738128142339
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1315735046255513601
-
I mean, if instead of a supernatural church with supernatural justification of n
I mean, if instead of a supernatural church with supernatural justification of natural law functioning as the Supreme Court between the states over an intentionally illiterate population, we had Aristotelian natural law Supreme Court doing the same with a literate population? https://t.co/xRhRXNBg0k
-
P-Law provides the formal logic of psychological and social sciences, with the a
P-Law provides the formal logic of psychological and social sciences, with the added benefit that it provides decidability in matters of substantive conflict (social science) versus mere argumentative (physical science).
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-12 19:14:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315732668739399681
-
P-Law provides the formal logic of psychological and social sciences, with the a
P-Law provides the formal logic of psychological and social sciences, with the added benefit that it provides decidability in matters of substantive conflict (social science) versus mere argumentative (physical science).
-
Very, very, smart question. Instead, is there a means by which to construct a la
Very, very, smart question.
Instead, is there a means by which to construct a law such that we produce a market for the suppression of falsehood, deceit, and fraud, that provides sufficient incentive to avoid greed and demonstrate the pretense of integrity?
Law, not belief. https://twitter.com/NinasNiche/status/1315728471256166400
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-12 19:00:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315729039596965895
-
Very, very, smart question. Instead, is there a means by which to construct a la
Very, very, smart question.
Instead, is there a means by which to construct a law such that we produce a market for the suppression of falsehood, deceit, and fraud, that provides sufficient incentive to avoid greed and demonstrate the pretense of integrity?
Law, not belief. https://t.co/POjxfUBAJW -
Very, very, smart question. Instead, is there a means by which to construct a la
Very, very, smart question.
Instead, is there a means by which to construct a law such that we produce a market for the suppression of falsehood, deceit, and fraud, that provides sufficient incentive to avoid greed and demonstrate the pretense of integrity?
Law not belief.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-12 18:59:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315728908617232384
Reply addressees: @NinasNiche
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315728471256166400
-
Very, very, smart question. Instead, is there a means by which to construct a la
Very, very, smart question.
Instead, is there a means by which to construct a law such that we produce a market for the suppression of falsehood, deceit, and fraud, that provides sufficient incentive to avoid greed and demonstrate the pretense of integrity?
Law not belief.
Reply addressees: @NinasNiche