Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • The Institute’s Proposed Constitutional Reforms

    1) Decidability is determined by limits, and limits by first causes: the Logical, Physical, Natural, and Evolutionary Laws. Europeans and only Europeans discovered, adapted to, and applied those laws. The enlightenment continentals violated them with Jews the most recent violator.

    2) Where the anglos sought a seat at the table, the French killed the middle class, then killed the aristocracy, then merged church and state, and retained the anti-empirical strategy of the church.The Germans (the moral people) created rationalism as secular replacement theology.

    3) The Jews sought to maintain separatism, to maintain strategy of unity through undermining hosts, with false promise of utopias – transforming selling their ‘big lies’ of the supernatural ancient world, with ‘big lies’ of the pseudoscientific modern world as method of sedition.

    4) The Germanic Europeans were the only people to tolerate the truth of the logical, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – sedating themselves with exhaustive Christian forgiveness of one another. The anglos the only to survive the Napoleonic destruction of Germanic Civ.

    5) Leaving the British as the only people dependent upon our ancestral natural common law, of self-determination by sovereignty, reciprocity in display word and deed, and duty to the commons. And the Americans to make the first attempt at a formal constitution of our natural law.

    6) My organization and I have completed the efforts of Germanic peoples, the English, and the founders, by producing a constitution of the european people that presumes nothing and declares everything so that the law isn’t open to abuse by “interpretation” (juridical fraud).

    7) In addition we have restored tort(crime) to words, and extended tort to cover false promise, baiting into hazard. (You won’t understand from these tweets). But we have created a constitution of “NO MORE LIES” and deprived the Jews of their ancient technique of war from within.

    8) In doing so we hope to not only reverse the century and a half of Jewish pseudoscience, sophism, and fraud; restore testimony as the default mode of public speech and public thought; and to prevent a repetition of the Jewish dark ages, and this dark age they have begun again.

    9) And we can do so without previous ‘prosecutions’ of the jews. and the good will reform and stay, and the bad will not reform and depart. (Despite our people’s want of restitution and punishment for their two thousand years of organized crime, and the 1b dead they caused.)

    10) Tort – the natural law of the universe, discovered adapted to and applied by western civilization – does not require intent – it requires failure of due diligence. Our reforms provide a method for testing the due diligence of claims against irreciprocity.

  • The Institute’s Proposed Constitutional Reforms

    1) Decidability is determined by limits, and limits by first causes: the Logical, Physical, Natural, and Evolutionary Laws. Europeans and only Europeans discovered, adapted to, and applied those laws. The enlightenment continentals violated them with Jews the most recent violator.

    2) Where the anglos sought a seat at the table, the French killed the middle class, then killed the aristocracy, then merged church and state, and retained the anti-empirical strategy of the church.The Germans (the moral people) created rationalism as secular replacement theology.

    3) The Jews sought to maintain separatism, to maintain strategy of unity through undermining hosts, with false promise of utopias – transforming selling their ‘big lies’ of the supernatural ancient world, with ‘big lies’ of the pseudoscientific modern world as method of sedition.

    4) The Germanic Europeans were the only people to tolerate the truth of the logical, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – sedating themselves with exhaustive Christian forgiveness of one another. The anglos the only to survive the Napoleonic destruction of Germanic Civ.

    5) Leaving the British as the only people dependent upon our ancestral natural common law, of self-determination by sovereignty, reciprocity in display word and deed, and duty to the commons. And the Americans to make the first attempt at a formal constitution of our natural law.

    6) My organization and I have completed the efforts of Germanic peoples, the English, and the founders, by producing a constitution of the european people that presumes nothing and declares everything so that the law isn’t open to abuse by “interpretation” (juridical fraud).

    7) In addition we have restored tort(crime) to words, and extended tort to cover false promise, baiting into hazard. (You won’t understand from these tweets). But we have created a constitution of “NO MORE LIES” and deprived the Jews of their ancient technique of war from within.

    8) In doing so we hope to not only reverse the century and a half of Jewish pseudoscience, sophism, and fraud; restore testimony as the default mode of public speech and public thought; and to prevent a repetition of the Jewish dark ages, and this dark age they have begun again.

    9) And we can do so without previous ‘prosecutions’ of the jews. and the good will reform and stay, and the bad will not reform and depart. (Despite our people’s want of restitution and punishment for their two thousand years of organized crime, and the 1b dead they caused.)

    10) Tort – the natural law of the universe, discovered adapted to and applied by western civilization – does not require intent – it requires failure of due diligence. Our reforms provide a method for testing the due diligence of claims against irreciprocity.

  • 10) Tort – the natural law of the universe, discovered adapted to and applied by

    10) Tort – the natural law of the universe, discovered adapted to and applied by western civilization – does not require intent – it requires failure of due diligence. Our reforms provide a method for testing the due diligence of claims against irreciprocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-27 15:05:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321105645580488705

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321105644062154752


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    9) And we can do so without previous ‘prosecutions’ of the jews. and the good will reform and stay, and the bad will not reform and depart. (Despite our people’s want of restitution and punishment for their two thousand years of organized crime, and the 1b dead they caused.)

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1321105644062154752

  • 7) In addition we have restored tort(crime) to words, and extended tort to cover

    7) In addition we have restored tort(crime) to words, and extended tort to cover false promise, baiting into hazard. (You won’t understand from these tweets). But we have created a constitution of “NO MORE LIES” and deprived the Jews of their ancient technique of war from within.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-27 15:05:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321105640660586499

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321105638953414657


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    6) My organization and I have completed the efforts of Germanic peoples, the English, and the founders, by producing a constitution of the european people that presumes nothing and declares everything so that the law isn’t open to abuse by “interpretation” (juridical fraud).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1321105638953414657

  • 6) My organization and I have completed the efforts of Germanic peoples, the Eng

    6) My organization and I have completed the efforts of Germanic peoples, the English, and the founders, by producing a constitution of the european people that presumes nothing and declares everything so that the law isn’t open to abuse by “interpretation” (juridical fraud).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-27 15:05:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321105638953414657

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321105636491485185


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    5) Leaving the British as the only people dependent upon our ancestral natural common law, of self-determination by sovereignty, reciprocity in display word and deed, and duty to the commons. And the Americans to make the first attempt at a formal constitution of our natural law.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1321105636491485185

  • They will search for any excuse. this is a line in the sand. The court probably

    They will search for any excuse. this is a line in the sand. The court probably will not allow it anyway and can go directly to the people. During the great FDR administration, it was possible to make the threat because of the depression. But if they try it today … no.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-27 02:28:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1320915258907725827

    Reply addressees: @HombreoftheWest

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1320914747496275969

  • Why does it matter? Other than clicks? 😉 The game is over. The left’s war on th

    Why does it matter? Other than clicks? 😉 The game is over. The left’s war on the constitution is at an end.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-26 22:40:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1320857846381248514

    Reply addressees: @GregStohr

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1320815860546719746

  • 5) P-Law provides the technical means of using the courts as a market for the su

    5) P-Law provides the technical means of using the courts as a market for the suppression of crimes, torts, and torts of the commons. If we apply p-law to the commons, including the informational commons, the Enemy will either domesticate or flee. In either case we win.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-24 23:50:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1320150661087068160

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1320150659652616192


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    4) But a law of zero tolerance requires a system measurement (decidability) sufficient for zero tolerance. Not only in materials and deeds, but in words, and display. Not only in crimes(intent) but in torts(unintentional). Not only against private but against the commons.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1320150659652616192

  • 4) But a law of zero tolerance requires a system measurement (decidability) suff

    4) But a law of zero tolerance requires a system measurement (decidability) sufficient for zero tolerance. Not only in materials and deeds, but in words, and display. Not only in crimes(intent) but in torts(unintentional). Not only against private but against the commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-24 23:50:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1320150659652616192

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1320150658075557888


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    3) The most intolerant wins in a battle of tolerances, just like the most adaptive wins in a battle of adaptation (innovation). The enemy specializes in exploiting the only substantial weakness in our civilization: tolerance.

    Thus, we require a law of zero tolerance.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1320150658075557888

  • The founders borrowed from three traditions: 1)The Holy Roman Empire’s weak cent

    The founders borrowed from three traditions: 1)The Holy Roman Empire’s weak central state over many independent states, 2) English Common Law and Parliament, and 3) the new french theory of division of power. Postwar anti-german sentiment cut our 50/50 Anglo-German history.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-10-23 01:15:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1319447202247442436