OUR DRAFT CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST FACEBOOK https://twitter.com/ThruTheHayes/status/1322927865004986368
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-01 16:25:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322937870152335361
Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence
-
2) And I don’t mean intentionally honest, because, (as in law) tort (dishonesty)
2) And I don’t mean intentionally honest, because, (as in law) tort (dishonesty) does not require intent – it requires a failure of due diligence.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-01 15:33:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322924755520000000
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322919826482933760
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
United center-left vs center-right front might work. But our (c-right) primary solution (requiring testimony in public speech) puts us in opposition with the narrative and strategy of the Jewish c-left. Peterson was a bridge (token). Only Karl Smith (c-left econ) is honest. https://twitter.com/ThruTheHayes/status/1322914618533122048
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322919826482933760
-
The Morality of P-law is easy. The langauge of P-Law is hard. The grammar is har
The Morality of P-law is easy. The langauge of P-Law is hard. The grammar is harder. The epistemology is very hard. Writing law using it is hardest. That said. You don’t need more than morality to understand ethics, and the language to detect lies. https://twitter.com/TruthQuest11/status/1322636191141896193
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 21:42:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322655145092591616
-
The Morality of P-law is easy. The angauge of P-Law is hard. The grammar is hard
The Morality of P-law is easy. The angauge of P-Law is hard. The grammar is harder. The epistemology is very hard. Writing law using it is hardest. That said. You don’t need more than the law to understand ethics, and the language to detect lies. https://twitter.com/TruthQuest11/status/1322636191141896193
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 21:16:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322648751106916357
-
23) Regulating state, market, and family participants to ‘living within their me
23) Regulating state, market, and family participants to ‘living within their means’ that maintains the balance of power, and it is only rule of law of tort that can be used to measure that balance.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 21:13:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322647974204362752
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322647973088632833
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
22) Because as every student of political history knows quite well, political groups make bad decisions, for no other reason than the competition between groups. Authoritarian organizations make mistakes too. It’s the adversarial competition between state, market, and family ….
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322647973088632833
-
18) … continental liberalism, ‘positive law’, ‘continental law’ meritless demo
18) … continental liberalism, ‘positive law’, ‘continental law’ meritless democracy, meritless access to political power, large states, open borders, multiculturalism all undermined the strong state (rule of law, constitutional monarchy), …
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 21:13:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322647968009388032
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322647966893674496
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
17) So the unpleasant lesson is that (despite my libertarian origins) is that Fasicm won the debate of the 20th. The french revolution destroyed the core of europe: the holy roman empire’s federation of states under customary law of tort, that French division of powers, …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322647966893674496
-
12) And only Europe and China paid those prices (china by credit, europe manoria
12) And only Europe and China paid those prices (china by credit, europe manorialism). And china’s only failure was not developing rule of law. Europe’s failure is that entrepreneurialism (wealth pursuit) was not constrained like the Chinese – who were ‘ahead’ of neighbors.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 21:13:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322647960774234113
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322647959629156355
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
11) This is the most adaptive political order possible – under the condition that you treat those unable to compete in it as domesticated animals (slaves, serfs, freemen). And this is the price europeans had to pay: soft eugenics.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322647959629156355
-
You really don’t understand tort law do you. Your rights are limited by the exte
You really don’t understand tort law do you. Your rights are limited by the externalities produced. You don’t have a choice. You don’t have control.we broke up banks, ATT and Microsoft for far less and they weren’t conspiring to advance a political agenda that’s seditious.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-29 16:27:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321851108617187328
Reply addressees: @alefeusch @AndrewYang
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321485212883185664
-
RT @Outsideness: “[The] idea that the court must be ‘balanced’ is madness. The o
RT @Outsideness: “[The] idea that the court must be ‘balanced’ is madness. The only people who should be on that court are justices who app…
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-28 14:26:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321458300525940738
-
The Institute’s Propose Constitutional Reforms
The Institute’s Propose Constitutional Reforms https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/10/27/the-institutes-propose-constitutional-reforms/
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-27 15:08:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1321106458847539201