Curt Doolittle

Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

  • SHERIFFS, DEPUTIES, POSSES, AND MILITIAS (From: “Shire(County) Reeves(Official)”

    SHERIFFS, DEPUTIES, POSSES, AND MILITIAS
    (From: “Shire(County) Reeves(Official)”)
    Sheriffs were created to:
    – Maintain law and order
    – Collect taxes (ouch)
    – Presiding over the shire court
    – Organize local defenses

    Today:
    – Sheriffs can appoint deputies full time (if paid and budget permitting).
    – Sheriffs can temporarily deputize civilians in emergencies (posse comitatus) – paid or unpaid.
    – It’s relatively easy for sheriffs to appoint ‘reserve’ deputies (emergencies) – paid or unpaid.
    – And special deputies for specific tasks and time periods – paid or unpaid.
    – Sheriffs were originally able to organize a militia for the purpose of civil defense. And certainly in the case of emergencies. It is unfortunate that we have lost this local control to bureaucratic hierarchy.

    IMO we must constitutionally standardize the role of sheriffs as more powerful than that of police, as sheriffs (Shire-Reeves) are technically responsible for the people and to the people. In other words, the last linen of defense of the people from political abuses.

    Which is why they must be elected.

    Now, I’m trying to make a point here. It’s not that I’m unaware of state differences. 😉

    Cheers
    CD

    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-29 13:05:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817908640109510656

  • POLICE RIGHTS (PRIVILEGES) Police have certain rights not presently available to

    POLICE RIGHTS (PRIVILEGES)
    Police have certain rights not presently available to citizens.
    1. Detainment
    2. Limited ability to issue commands.
    3. Power of Arrest
    4. Use of Force (even deadly force)
    5. Entry into Properties with Warrant
    6. Search and Seizure
    7. Undercover…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-29 12:55:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817906778459259243

  • RT @AutistocratMS: This is based on deception of what rights are, those can only

    RT @AutistocratMS: This is based on deception of what rights are, those can only emerge via group membership. Groups grant individuals righ…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-28 21:11:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1817669204058755553

  • Meaning Of Medical Licenses (Re White House) Medical PhD’s are earned. Residenci

    Meaning Of Medical Licenses (Re White House)
    Medical PhD’s are earned. Residencies are earned. They are demonstrated competencies. Licenses are issued on a state by state basis for the purpose of consumer protection and satisfying insurance companies. They are usually taken in stages during university training and residency training. These licences were developed as a standard of measurement to test the success of education and training – in particular to prevent ‘questionable degrees’ given the laxity of degree regulations in the USA.
    One does not necessarily need to keep a license current. And one can often hold multiple licenses from many states depending upon the doctor’s patient distribution.
    Not all physicians are certified by a board. Certification is voluntary. There is no federal equivalent of a medical license.
    Most white house medical physicians (usually 5) are military not civilian. They can and usually do have a state or DC license.
    The White House Physician (title) is usually selected by the president. The president can appoint any physician he or she requires.
    The white house has it’s own Pharmacy. And it can acquire prescription drugs directly from distributors and manufacturers.
    Doctors are free to give opinions regardless of the currency of a license. The problems arise with writing prescriptions, and liability with hospitals and patients.
    The white house doctor gave an opinion.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @3ChicsPolitico @MacFarlaneNews

    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-26 19:30:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1816919009641791492

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1816889769198002192

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @William68332190 @SepteusT @acrimonyand Rule of Law: Creates

    RT @curtdoolittle: @William68332190 @SepteusT @acrimonyand Rule of Law: Creates Adversarial Competition, Maintaining an Equilibrium, betwee…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-26 00:23:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1816630458676867440

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: BEYOND CAPACITY Flood the courts. Taking a fraction of the wro

    RT @ThruTheHayes: BEYOND CAPACITY

    Flood the courts.

    Taking a fraction of the wrongs done to the people during the pandemic will see our s…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-24 16:49:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1816153730921689217

  • And no, I don’t think impeaching clinton for philandering with an overweight una

    And no, I don’t think impeaching clinton for philandering with an overweight unattractive intern was permissible any more than the fabricated lawfare against Trump, or going after Obama for clearly accepting a book deal as a bribe for passing legislation. I don’t even believe… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1812956626196046028

    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-23 04:06:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1815599448313192601

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: THE CIVIL RIGHTS LEGISLATION OF THE SIXTIES WAS AN ACT OF WAR

    RT @ThruTheHayes: THE CIVIL RIGHTS LEGISLATION OF THE SIXTIES WAS AN ACT OF WAR

    The results backwards speak for themselves.

    Intentions; t…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-22 16:12:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1815419685438906763

  • TRUSTS VS LLC, S-CORP, C-CORP A trust requires someone trustworthy to manage it:

    TRUSTS VS LLC, S-CORP, C-CORP
    A trust requires someone trustworthy to manage it: a trustee. This is the only ‘risk’.
    If a trustee steals from a trust it is a crime and prosecutable.
    A trust may operate for financial gain.
    A trust main hold a corporation as an asset.
    A trust is taxed like an individual taxpayer.
    A group of people or families can essentially contribute assets to a trust to protect them.
    If assets are placed in an irrevocable trust before marriage, then they are insulated from spousal seizure during divorce proceedings – if specified in the trust. (Some people might want those assets to go to a spouse at death for example.)
    Beneficiaries can leverage assets in trust for the purpose of credit.
    Even Houses can be placed into trust.
    If a trust does not distribute income, it pays tax at the rate of the total income from the trust. A trust can distribute income and individuals pay tax according to the tax rate of the individual parties, and as such not force all parties to pay the tax rate of the aggregate income of the trust.

    Basic Benefits:
    1) asset protection.
    2) probate evasion and intergenerational transfer.

    Limits Too Benefits:
    1) If a beneficiary has too much control over the trust (such as a self-settled trust where the grantor is also a beneficiary), creditors may argue that the assets should be available to satisfy the beneficiary’s debts.
    2) Alimony and Child Support: Courts may order distributions from a trust to satisfy alimony, child support, or other family law obligations, particularly if the trust was funded by the grantor.
    3) Piercing the Trust Veil: In some cases, courts may “pierce the trust veil” if they determine that the trust is essentially a sham or an alter ego of the grantor, meaning it is not being used for legitimate asset protection or estate planning purposes.

    So, effectively, joining a large scale trust is equivalent to joining a medieval monastery. Which is fascinating. 😉

    Reply addressees: @DwightExMachina @FestivusQueen @verymoisturized

    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-20 00:07:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1814452122689077248

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1814444900777160846

  • RT @WerrellBradley: TRUST AND SOVEREIGNTY This item outlines the value of Trusts

    RT @WerrellBradley: TRUST AND SOVEREIGNTY

    This item outlines the value of Trusts in providing legal protection from legal action for indiv…

    Source date (UTC): 2024-07-19 23:22:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1814440610100637725