RT @ThruTheHayes: The world is a simple place; but you complicate it with lies. It is possible to use the law to restore integrity to disco…
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-10 01:23:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325972429185945600
RT @ThruTheHayes: There is no difference between modern lawmakers trying to justify ‘positive law’ and the king’s claims of ‘divine right’.…
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-10 01:23:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325972418150674433
RT @ThruTheHayes: THE LAW
By: @curtdoolittle , @ThruTheHayes
The law functions as a NEGATIVE market of dispute resolution just like the m…
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-10 01:22:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325972117637255168
Lets state this differently as it is seeking to solve a problem that most states have failed to solve, which is a central title registry, and transacton system
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-10 01:11:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325969387287941122
Reply addressees: @NRxAuthors
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325969066318819329
6) The law functions as a NEGATIVE market of dispute resolution just like the marketplace functions as a positive market for cooperation. There is no difference between modern lawmakers trying to justify ‘positive law’ and the king’s claims of ‘divine right’. ZERO DIFFERENCE.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-09 23:51:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325949105202409472
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325946973816565760
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
5) It is possible to use the law to restore integrity to discourse, politics, and yes, the law itself. The law is our first institution. We are the only people to develop the law as our first institution. It is what separates the west from the rest. Law and science are the same.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1325946973816565760
5) It is possible to use the law to restore integrity to discourse, politics, and yes, the law itself. The law is our first institution. We are the only people to develop the law as our first institution. It is what separates the west from the rest. Law and science are the same.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-09 23:42:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325946973816565760
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325946471754178560
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
4) This is one of eight major reforms to the law and the constitution that completes the early european, Aristotelian, roman, germanic, English, and American ‘natural’ (scientific) law program.
Natural philosophy and natural law mean “Science”. And science means ‘testimony’.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1325946471754178560
3) So when we say strict construction, it means, that you must strictly construct the law from the first principles of self-determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, and the resulting positive and negative (juridical) markets in all walks of life.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-09 23:40:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325946470462349317
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325946469145337857
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
2) In P-Law We use require ‘original intent’ declared when making law, and use ‘strict construction’ as in mathematics (measurement) and programming (operations) – law looks like programming a bit – to not only limit judicial interpetation, but state construction.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1325946469145337857
4) This is one of eight major reforms to the law and the constitution that completes the early european, Aristotelian, roman, germanic, English, and American ‘natural’ (scientific) law program.
Natural philosophy and natural law mean “Science”. And science means ‘testimony’.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-09 23:40:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325946471754178560
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325946470462349317
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
3) So when we say strict construction, it means, that you must strictly construct the law from the first principles of self-determination, sovereignty, reciprocity, and the resulting positive and negative (juridical) markets in all walks of life.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1325946470462349317
2) In P-Law We use require ‘original intent’ declared when making law, and use ‘strict construction’ as in mathematics (measurement) and programming (operations) – law looks like programming a bit – to not only limit judicial interpetation, but state construction.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-09 23:40:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325946469145337857
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325946467664728067
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
1) P-Law: Previous generations of legal theorists couldn’t formalize the law – especially given the conflict between common(law), positive law (command), and marxism (parasitism (anti-law)). Scholars use “Strict Construction, Originalism, and Textualism” because of this failure.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1325946467664728067
1) P-Law: Previous generations of legal theorists couldn’t formalize the law – especially given the conflict between common(law), positive law (command), and marxism (parasitism (anti-law)). Scholars use “Strict Construction, Originalism, and Textualism” because of this failure.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-09 23:40:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1325946467664728067