RT @ThruTheHayes: LAWFARE & WARFARE
Trump says that lawfare presents as warfare in its present manifestations.
Correct.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-13 17:11:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1823407043144995260
RT @ThruTheHayes: LAWFARE & WARFARE
Trump says that lawfare presents as warfare in its present manifestations.
Correct.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-13 17:11:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1823407043144995260
RT @Sargon_of_Akkad: The National Black Police Association itself is proof of a two-tier system of policing because there is no National Wh…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-09 18:35:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821978502738203130
RT @ThruTheHayes: TARGET BEHAVIORS
There’s no quicker way to peace than punishing unlawful behaviors; the swifter the better. Citizens are…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-09 16:59:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821954513051206016
I will add this to our constitutional reforms, along with savings increased by the rate of inflation and decreased by the rate of deflation? I dunno. I think the deflatoin thing might end the desire for the inflation thing. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-09 16:50:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821952104467968291
Reply addressees: @FuryForth @CraigChamberlin @elonmusk
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821942105805119904
Its possibly a misunderstood statement because I didnt complete the explanation: They took law from us, Yes, but our law was negativa (what not to do) and they used law more abstractly to explain their group strategy as a positiva (what to do as well). So my work does both.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-08 17:50:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821604991658029336
Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa @NatLawInstitute
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821514057066684898
Its possibly a misunderstood statement because I didnt complete the explanation: They took law from us, Yes, but our law was negativa (what not to do) and they used law more abstractly to explain their group strategy as a positiva (what to do as well). So my work does both.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-08 17:50:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821604991582539776
No, he is suing them for racketeering. I’ve prosecuted a case before and it works.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-07 03:26:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821025035861000327
Reply addressees: @BernardoKastrup
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820966169693876605
RT @elonmusk: I strongly encourage any company who has been systematically boycotted by advertisers to file a lawsuit.
There may also be…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-07 00:05:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820974497077321770
(NLI UPDATE)
Martin and I restarted our work on the constitution today. I wore out after a few hours, but the work is good and as usual, Martin is a pleasure to work with.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-05 22:23:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820586519419085118
Now, in addition to the right to bear arms for personal, private, and political ends, we need constitutionally mandated:
‘stand your ground’,
‘castle doctrine’,
as well as:
‘initiation of defense’
‘necessity defense’
‘justifiable homicide’,
and to expand:
‘defense of others’, and… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1819806473859567911
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-03 18:45:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1819806721608413449