Category: Law, Constitution, and Jurisprudence

THE SCIENCE, LOGIC, AND LAW OF LYING BY SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION

@curtd @RenegadeScoutr @Snidely_Whiplash @voxday

— “It’s not that you use difficult words. It’s that the words you mean do not mean what you think they mean.” —

Are you sure? Can you testify to that?

It’s called Continuous Recursive Adversarial Disambiguation by Serialization and Operationalzation producing terms as a spectrum of unambiguous measurements, thereby preventing the many forms of sophistry, denial, deceit, and fraud, made possible by ambiguity in terms.

At the beginning of this prosecution of the vox-moron-clique, explicitly demonstrated disambiguation of Faith(Theology) > Belief (Philosophy) > Trust (Science(Law)), to illustrated how one of the vox-morons was trying to claim that belief in the supernatural (mythicism) was equal to Trust in science (testimony).

This is why you can’t tolerate the precision of terms I’m using, or the method of argument I’m using, because they deny you the ability to justify your social construction of falsehood (technically fraud by fictionalism, using sophistry and supernaturalism), by conflation, inflation, sophistry, social construction, false promise (fraud) of freedom from the four sets of laws of the universe, where testimony (truth) would require:

Realism, Naturalism, Identity(uniqueness,unambiguous), internal consistency, operational possibility, external correspondence, rational choice, reciprocity of rational choice, stated limits, full accounting within those limits, competitive parsimony, warrantability, warranty of due diligence, within the limits of your restitutability.

Because that’s the test of whether you may claim a statement is true without engaging in lying by design or by falure of due diligence. And when you fail due diligence by motivated reasoning, that means you’ve pursued self interest, and therefore committed a crime against the informational commons upon which all members of the polity depend for understanding, predicting, planning, and action.

Now, (a) I know this is over your head (b) I know it will likely always be over your head, (c) because you would never try to justify your existing network of socially constructed deceits, and your practice of female method of argument that replaces the priority of truth and falsehood with approval and disapproval, and then relies on pretense of knowledge, denial, disapproval, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, ridiculing, gossiping, rallying, poisoning the well, reputation destruction, and canceling.

So all you have done during this little expermiental prosecution of mine, a prosecution you vox-morons have initiated with your female attacks, is provide overwhelming evidence of the veracity of my accusations, arguments, and convictions of you as a criminal network whose purpose is to preserve your organized crimes against the informational commons upon which all people depend.

Cheers