The False promise of nature of man (amoral), variation in man (vast in races, classes), of the malleability of man (non-blank slate), in the possibility of endless growth (end of scarcity), escaping reciprocity, hierarchy, low hanging fruit of discovery, markets, market eugenics.
Reply addressees: @noxaxis1
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
The False promise of nature of man (amoral), variation in man (vast in races, cl
-
That they are a problem? 😉 Opposing grp strategies. Genetic difference. Unresol
That they are a problem? 😉 Opposing grp strategies. Genetic difference. Unresolvable. European/East Asian advantage was eugenics, and the left’s program is a revolt against Darwin’s explanation for the success of western civ: discovering, adapting to, applying, laws of nature.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-22 00:16:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285730282042204160
Reply addressees: @noxaxis1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285728739456933890
-
That they are a problem? 😉 Opposing grp strategies. Genetic difference. Unresol
That they are a problem? 😉 Opposing grp strategies. Genetic difference. Unresolvable. European/East Asian advantage was eugenics, and the left’s program is a revolt against Darwin’s explanation for the success of western civ: discovering, adapting to, applying, laws of nature.
Reply addressees: @noxaxis1 -
Furthermore, the most complete and recent work is by Reich, and even he is timid
Furthermore, the most complete and recent work is by Reich, and even he is timid about stating it openly.
But it’s pretty clear.
IQ over in 80’s, Blank slate over in ’99, Sex differences in ’12, race differences in ’19. The entire “differences denial’ movement is over.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 21:53:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285694455765438464
Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @JadeBai85455803 @SPQRIUS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285689928198828034
-
Furthermore, the most complete and recent work is by Reich, and even he is timid
Furthermore, the most complete and recent work is by Reich, and even he is timid about stating it openly.
But it’s pretty clear.
IQ over in 80’s, Blank slate over in ’99, Sex differences in ’12, race differences in ’19. The entire “differences denial’ movement is over.
Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @JadeBai85455803 @SPQRIUS -
However, despite neoteny, class size is more relevant. Northern Europeans practi
However, despite neoteny, class size is more relevant. Northern Europeans practiced eugenics throughout our entire history. East Asians too. So we both have the most neotenic and smallest underclasses and the most advanced civilizations because of it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 21:50:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285693553889423360
Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @JadeBai85455803 @SPQRIUS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285690098647027717
-
However, despite neoteny, class size is more relevant. Northern Europeans practi
However, despite neoteny, class size is more relevant. Northern Europeans practiced eugenics throughout our entire history. East Asians too. So we both have the most neotenic and smallest underclasses and the most advanced civilizations because of it.
Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @JadeBai85455803 @SPQRIUS -
So as yet we don’t know how many genes regualate the expression of (a) neoteny (
So as yet we don’t know how many genes regualate the expression of (a) neoteny (slow development), and (b) class (quality). And africans least, austronesians next. middle eastern next, central asian next, indians next, eruopeans next, and east asians last is the hierarchy.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 21:48:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285693153933176838
Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @JadeBai85455803 @SPQRIUS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285690098647027717
-
So as yet we don’t know how many genes regualate the expression of (a) neoteny (
So as yet we don’t know how many genes regualate the expression of (a) neoteny (slow development), and (b) class (quality). And africans least, austronesians next. middle eastern next, central asian next, indians next, eruopeans next, and east asians last is the hierarchy.
Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @JadeBai85455803 @SPQRIUS -
For example, as in the well-known example of domestication of foxes, just select
For example, as in the well-known example of domestication of foxes, just selecting for testosterone levels (one change) will produce domestication. In humans it’s the same basic developmental difference: 1) neoteny and 2) selection pressure: class size.
Vast racial differences.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-21 21:45:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285692370726551555
Reply addressees: @aptest_eve @JadeBai85455803 @SPQRIUS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1285691888415145984
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@aptest_eve @JadeBai85455803 @SPQRIUS This fallacy is so well known in science that it has a name: Lewontin’s fallacy. It takes advantage of human ignorance of the size and functional composition of our genes, few of which are declarative and most of which are regulatory. In other words, tiny variation = huge effect.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1285691888415145984