And so females retain instinctual priorities: her children, her close women, other women,a male that they can control, the pool of males he has access to assist in her control(defense),and her status and resources gained in relation to other females and influence over them by it.
Reply addressees: @bishkebab3
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
And so females retain instinctual priorities: her children, her close women, oth
-
And so females retain instinctual priorities: her children, her close women, oth
And so females retain instinctual priorities: her children, her close women, other women,a male that they can control, the pool of males he has access to assist in her control(defense),and her status and resources gained in relation to other females and influence over them by it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-31 14:58:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1289213765506850818
Reply addressees: @bishkebab3
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1289213202543316998
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@bishkebab3 So instinctually and pragmatically it was better to try to control (manipulate, seduce) males and rise in the hierarchy in a band of females than to be captured by other males and rise in a different hierarchy. But the risk always existed. Males killed males but captured females.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1289213202543316998
-
So instinctually and pragmatically it was better to try to control (manipulate,
So instinctually and pragmatically it was better to try to control (manipulate, seduce) males and rise in the hierarchy in a band of females than to be captured by other males and rise in a different hierarchy. But the risk always existed. Males killed males but captured females.
Reply addressees: @bishkebab3 -
So instinctually and pragmatically it was better to try to control (manipulate,
So instinctually and pragmatically it was better to try to control (manipulate, seduce) males and rise in the hierarchy in a band of females than to be captured by other males and rise in a different hierarchy. But the risk always existed. Males killed males but captured females.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-31 14:55:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1289213202543316998
Reply addressees: @bishkebab3
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1289212603244347398
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@bishkebab3 The answer is unpleasant. Priority to survive by fitting in. Because females were treated, like territory, as the property of a band of males throughout all of primate history. Males captured females. So female priority is children&women first regardless of male tyrants(owners).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1289212603244347398
-
The answer is unpleasant. Priority to survive by fitting in. Because females wer
The answer is unpleasant. Priority to survive by fitting in. Because females were treated, like territory, as the property of a band of males throughout all of primate history. Males captured females. So female priority is children&women first regardless of male tyrants(owners).
Reply addressees: @bishkebab3 -
The answer is unpleasant. Priority to survive by fitting in. Because females wer
The answer is unpleasant. Priority to survive by fitting in. Because females were treated, like territory, as the property of a band of males throughout all of primate history. Males captured females. So female priority is children&women first regardless of male tyrants(owners).
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-31 14:53:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1289212603244347398
Reply addressees: @bishkebab3
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1289044182091235329
-
RT @ramzpaul: This is not surprising. Women tend to follow whatever is the offic
RT @ramzpaul: This is not surprising. Women tend to follow whatever is the official narrative. Ayn Rand wrote that women were more likely t…
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-30 21:33:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288950974023970816
-
RT @ramzpaul: This is not surprising. Women tend to follow whatever is the offic
RT @ramzpaul: This is not surprising. Women tend to follow whatever is the official narrative. Ayn Rand wrote that women were more likely t…
-
Marx’s work denies the nature of man as he is, and presumes the nature of man’s
Marx’s work denies the nature of man as he is, and presumes the nature of man’s instincts as female instincts.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-30 14:25:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288843227223793666
Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5 @bishkebab3
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288842928023048193
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Coronakrise5 @bishkebab3 Marx’s work is Abrahamic. Its an application of the Abrahamic project. It denies physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. It seeks to undermine meritocracy and markets for class cooperation. It promises of revolution (heaven), equality, non-competition, ending scarcity.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1288842928023048193
-
Marx’s work denies the nature of man as he is, and presumes the nature of man’s
Marx’s work denies the nature of man as he is, and presumes the nature of man’s instincts as female instincts.
Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5 @bishkebab3