Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • RE: Matrilineal and Matriarchal Societies? Communes are a durable fantasy of fem

    RE: Matrilineal and Matriarchal Societies?

    Communes are a durable fantasy of feminine thinking.

    But there are no survivable female societies, and the one we have left is evidence of what happened in the past: when men are decimated by war, women can, for a time, form female centric orders – until other men want their bodies, their livestock, or their territory.

    So, the fantasy of Non-Paternal societies presumes that men as a group would allow you those freedoms. Because they could easily reduce you to slavery. After all, the europeans are the product of the steppe invasion who killed 90% of men, older women, and kept the young as sex and labor slaves. :).

    Men only need dormitories (the precursors of christian monasteries) to take care of one another. They could instead, and generally do, form barracks instead – since together than can easily force others to do their will. Without a fence of men, women cannot even protect one another.

    The truth is this: our experiment with intergenerational redistribution has failed because women will not bear enough children to pay for their retirement. And women consume 70% of government resources, when men over 30 provide 65% of government resources.

    So what I think we mean is that the family is no longer a viable institution. And female employability will be replaced almost entirely by automation – far more so than male labor. This intersexual conflict is suicide.

    Yes women are social creatures. But men are political creatures. The social order is dependent upon the political order, and the political order is dependent upon the military order – and this will never, ever, cease.

    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-12 15:37:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1988632283105100143

  • Joyce. This is false because interpersonally you can judge merit vs cost. Like m

    Joyce.
    This is false because interpersonally you can judge merit vs cost. Like most female intuition it doesn’t scale up. Conversely as I am sure you’ve experienced, male intuition scales well but doesn’t scale down well. This is why men and women shake their heads at each other’s incompetence outside of their scales.

    Women are a disaster in voting, higher education, industrially competitive business, most management, judicial and political office for this reason.

    Empathy that suppresses behavioral change,competitive advantage, responsibility, and accountability.

    As we see in the younger generations.

    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-12 02:39:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1988436472396128513

  • WHY I LISTEN TO WOMEN I’ve been told consistently that the success I have had wi

    WHY I LISTEN TO WOMEN
    I’ve been told consistently that the success I have had with relationships (women) is that I actually listen and seek to understand, despite the volume, loading and framing they do – which they NEED to. The benefit of listening to women is that it’s like getting an extra nervous system and brain that sees the personal and interpersonal world with the same resolution I see the causal and systemic world. Recognizing that value is why I listen to women. Recognizing it’s limits is why I regulate women’s influence in the economic, political, and strategic realms.

    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-11 20:09:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1988338411267387629

  • The problem is serious however since female cognitive emotional bias is strong a

    The problem is serious however since female cognitive emotional bias is strong and pre-rational, and women rely on emotion (empathy) and discount or ignore responsibility, cost, and consequence under the instinct not to be left behind, particularly necessary for children. However like all female neuroticism it is merely projection more so than empathy.

    So the question isnt rights because one has no right to harm just because of projection, empathy, ore feelings. Instead, how can women learn reason over instinct and reason. We know the answer: three or more children.

    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-09 00:43:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1987320052820201483

  • The question is whether the world you wish for is possible. It isn’t. We must go

    The question is whether the world you wish for is possible. It isn’t. We must govern with the humans that exist, not those we wish existed. So the evidence is that women influencing politics kills civilization. Every. Single. Time.

    Every single time.

    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-06 14:22:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1986438957736075442

  • Of course. ;). Though my research in sex differences in cognition ad deceit, and

    Of course. ;). Though my research in sex differences in cognition ad deceit, and deep economic history were more influential on my understanding..

    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-06 13:50:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1986431076357841280

  • It’s your effeminacy. (Really)

    It’s your effeminacy. (Really)

    Source date (UTC): 2025-11-03 20:03:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1985437636153209237

  • The distribution of neoteny, intelligence, agency, ability, and personality trai

    The distribution of neoteny, intelligence, agency, ability, and personality traits, in particular between the sexes, and classes and races means that libertarianism is only possible for and rational for, a minority of exceptional individuals. So the people least desirous of political power are the people most suited to it – only if they have a practical understanding of human nature and experience in managing populations. Ergo it is rule of law by the natural law that enables those people with such constructive biases to deliver value to themselves as well as the polity.

    Source date (UTC): 2025-10-31 19:38:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1984344290127200587

  • Accusation is not argument, it is evidence of the absence of one’s argument. I d

    Accusation is not argument, it is evidence of the absence of one’s argument. I do not err. You do. You demonstrate such. Sorry.
    I can if necessary explain the genetics and early development of migration of stem cells from the neural tube and their inhibition as neotenic expression. (it’s visible to the left of my diagram of the spread of human diversity into subspecies (races)). Science is what it is. Ideology is what you’ve been taught. Sorry.
    Humans are the only taxonomic category that does not treat subspecies as such. This alone is evidence of human evasion of the truth.

    Source date (UTC): 2025-10-31 18:35:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1984328271002226992

  • NO. Empathy requires information necessary to judge the difference between subsi

    NO. Empathy requires information necessary to judge the difference between subsidy of free riding, parasitism, and predation vs incapacity, incompetence, or emergency. Empathy doesn’t scale because human interests and abilities don’t scale. The best we can achieve is meritocracy independent of subsidy of malincentives. At present the number of people on ‘benefits’ whether children, adult, or senior citizen is making every other investment nearly impossible. How many people are we subsidizing their bad behavior vs how many are we protecting from harm despite their good behavior. We can and do know these things. Because subsidy ‘baits people into the hazard of not changing their behavior to suit their needs.’

    Source date (UTC): 2025-10-30 16:24:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1983933039706300848