It’s just another example of sex differences in cognitive bias (short/empathic/interpersonal vs long/systematic/political), in dominance(confidence)/submission(fear), confict (confruntation/undermining) in trait expression, in intelligence, market value, experience, and training.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-17 16:05:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1339602675373989895
Reply addressees: @MarcusDirusso
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1339600760342921217
altruism doesn’t so much exist as the altruistic feeling from investing so that we obtain returns. There is no behavior in man that is not selfish.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-17 15:17:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1339590620701061128
Reply addressees: @_CHAD99 @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1339586239796658178
EUGENICS IS THE MORAL CHOICE
The reason I emphasize eugenics – preventing genetic load, regression – is to foster adaptation, quality, equality, redistribution, choice, and fulfillment. It’s a choice. We get short term feels for long term failure, or we pay people for short term feels, for long term success.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-17 14:48:01 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105396075292648102
LOYALTY VS DEVOTION
The historical problem of israel and the jews: hatred of masculine loyalty in responsibility, commitment to feminine devotion in its evasion (clannish). The open question is whether the need to maintain their homeland will cure their eternal problem – or diasporics preserve it.
The point? male loyalty differs from female devotion, in that loyalty demands the bearing of costs regardless of self or family, and female devotion demands the bearing of costs exclusively for self and family.
–“Loyal recognizes his debt from the past to another, devoted only recognizes future potential for gain from the other.”– Martin Stepan
In other words, you cannot trust those who practice the female strategy by confusing pragmatic devotion with long term loyalty.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-17 14:47:14 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105396072251141760
LOYALTY VS DEVOTION
The point? male loyalty differs from female devotion, in that loyalty demands the bearing of costs regardless of self or family, and female devotion demands the bearing of costs exclusively for self and family. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1339576008371040256
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-17 14:45:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1339582621853110274
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1339576008371040256
The reason I emphasize eugenics – preventing genetic load, regression – is to foster adaptation, quality, equality, redistribution, choice, and fulfillment. It’s a choice. We get short term feels for long term failure, or we pay people for short term feels, for long term success.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-17 14:33:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1339579521826254850
(Defending @NewRightAmerica from potential critics with added clarity:) Trait IQ grants access to income and success while trait conscientiousness provides access to accumulated wealth along the spectrum as long as one has minimum IQ (100+).
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-17 14:05:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1339572401521233922
Reply addressees: @NewRightAmerica
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1339570183137058816
Class, status, and power distance grant access to opportunity and competitive advantages in sexual, social, economic, and political markets. Kin selection and competition from non-kin prevent these markets from maximizing redistribution by minimization of those differences. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1339566551251480578
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-17 13:53:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1339569363859419136
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1339566551251480578
Making Everyone Happy: Disambiguating Intelligence. https://t.co/fMlq1dsBg0
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-17 13:46:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1339567645998387200
DISAMBIGUATING THE TERM INTELLIGENCE
So that we can discuss it intelligently.
Intelligence is the term for Rate of Cognitive Adaptation, and that rate is determined by neurological scale, quality of integration, and response time. We can measure a) those responses, b) their result by written tests, or c) as demonstrated by competitive consequence in life.
So to disambiguate the term ‘intelligence’ we find the sequence: |Rate of Adaptation|: physiological intelligence (body) > cognitive intelligence (mind) > and demonstrated intelligence (action). And therefore clarify the dispute over the meaning of the term.
For thirty years I’ve made the same argument:that Demonstrated Intelligence consists in the following, in order: a) (g) or physiology, b) working memory, c) personality traits, d) idiosyncratic experience, d) general knowledge, e) domain knowledge, and g) false wants and beliefs.
The measure of DEMONSTRATED intelligence is one’s actions. But those actions will accumulate in success in any field by advantage over every other individual in that field of lesser intelligence, mediated by conscientiousness, specialization, and dedicated experience.
Most people like others speaking beyond their ken, often confuses a RESOURCE with its APPLICATION. Intelligence is in fact a scalar measure – which is why it was discovered. DEMONSTRATED intelligence is dependent upon the other personality traits and idiosyncratic experience.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-17 13:45:09 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105395828111839512