Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Major Update to GSRRM Definition

    The Female Technique of Social Superpredation by Gossiping Shaming Ridiculing Rallying and Moralizing

    • Undermining (blaming) by GSRRM: Disapproving > Denying, Shaming > Gossiping, Outraging > Rallying, Psychologizing > Moralizing, Dominating > Oppressing, Reputation-Destruction > Propagandizing (Limiting consumption)

    The Technique of “GSRRM” includes: … (L)ying by Plausible Deniability By: … (E)vading the Truth By: … (E)quating Truth to (F)ace, (A)pproval, or (C)onsent By: … (D)isapproving … … (D)enying … … … (S)ilence And By Escalating To: … (S)haming, … … (M)oralizing, … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … (O)utraging, And By Escalating To: … (R)allying … … (G)ossiping … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … (P)ropagandizing And By Escalating To: … (S)houting Down … … (S)ilencing … … … (C)ancelling  … … … … (D)eplatforming (interference in communication and colaboration) And By Escalating to: … (R)eputation destruction (interference in reputation) … … (D)oxxing (interference in safety and anonymity) … … … (J)ob Doxxing (interference in employement) … … … … (B)usiness Doxxing (interference in the conduct of a business) And By Escalating to: … (C)ourt Abuse (using cost of litigation to silence, obtain false confession, or to harm) … … (J)udicial Abuse (using select cases to exploit vunlerabilities in the law) … … … (C)onstitutional Abuse (using advocacy of incrementally harmful legislation to exploit vulnerabilities in the construction of the constitution, under cover of moral pretense) And By Escalating to: … (M)ore…

    In western history under our ancient laws, men were prohibited from reputation destruction by direct violence between men under the law of the Duel. 

    In western history Female Conflict (social violence by GSRRM) was largely illegal or punishable under laws against “scolds” –women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace.

    During the democratic and Marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony).

    Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.

    GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience.

  • Bias Sortition

    We are all afflicted by the tendencies to (a) think we are representative of common sense (b) other people think and feel similarly to us, (c) and we associate with people who do, (d) therefore we continuously develop positive reinforcement of cognitive falsehoods.

  • Bias Sortition

    We are all afflicted by the tendencies to (a) think we are representative of common sense (b) other people think and feel similarly to us, (c) and we associate with people who do, (d) therefore we continuously develop positive reinforcement of cognitive falsehoods.

  • Why Do Western Women Undermine Western Civilization?

    WHY DO WESTERN WOMEN UNDERMINE WESTERN CIVILIZATION? 1. Anglos converted to 100% middle class, seeking cheap success in democracy without paying the cost of maintaining our intellectual, social, economic, political advantage by military service, unity, political control. 2. Aryanism (European civilization’s core drive) is heroic so breeds altruism and virtue signaling. 3. Christianity teaches submission, pacifism, tolerance, and amplifies altruism, altruistic punishment, and virtue signal spirals if virtue can be proxied through political pretense instead of personal action at personal cost. Fake Christians. Fake Christian Ethics. 4. And Women are Worst. They seek attention. They seek attention as aggressively as men seek sex. And verbal signaling is cheaper for them than men’s signaling status by demonstrated achievement. And they seek safety. They seek safety by signaling non-aggression. They seek safety by virtue-signaling non-aggression. They used mass communication combined with women in the voting pool, to virtue signal without personal cost. They created a market of escalating demands for attention, and escalating demand for attention by virtue signaling of non-aggression, thereby producing virtue signal spirals that convert from non-aggression and tolerance to aggression and intolerance. (Just as Popper predicted.) 5. This demand for attention, the pretense of non-aggression, virtue signaling (value signaling), and escalating demand for attention by virtue-signaling into virtue signal spirals, that turns into intolerance, aggression and undermining is simply female social super-predation industrialized by mass communication, where the costs of their political ‘accommodation’ of the enemies of civilization are born by men and men alone.

  • Why Do Western Women Undermine Western Civilization?

    WHY DO WESTERN WOMEN UNDERMINE WESTERN CIVILIZATION? 1. Anglos converted to 100% middle class, seeking cheap success in democracy without paying the cost of maintaining our intellectual, social, economic, political advantage by military service, unity, political control. 2. Aryanism (European civilization’s core drive) is heroic so breeds altruism and virtue signaling. 3. Christianity teaches submission, pacifism, tolerance, and amplifies altruism, altruistic punishment, and virtue signal spirals if virtue can be proxied through political pretense instead of personal action at personal cost. Fake Christians. Fake Christian Ethics. 4. And Women are Worst. They seek attention. They seek attention as aggressively as men seek sex. And verbal signaling is cheaper for them than men’s signaling status by demonstrated achievement. And they seek safety. They seek safety by signaling non-aggression. They seek safety by virtue-signaling non-aggression. They used mass communication combined with women in the voting pool, to virtue signal without personal cost. They created a market of escalating demands for attention, and escalating demand for attention by virtue signaling of non-aggression, thereby producing virtue signal spirals that convert from non-aggression and tolerance to aggression and intolerance. (Just as Popper predicted.) 5. This demand for attention, the pretense of non-aggression, virtue signaling (value signaling), and escalating demand for attention by virtue-signaling into virtue signal spirals, that turns into intolerance, aggression and undermining is simply female social super-predation industrialized by mass communication, where the costs of their political ‘accommodation’ of the enemies of civilization are born by men and men alone.

  • Example of When Men Argue as Women – and Explaining Why It Matters

    EXAMPLE OF WHEN MEN ARGUE AS WOMEN – AND EXPLAINING WHY IT MATTERS

    -“Even your opinions wrong.”- a hostile

    I pretty much never err. It’s my job not to. I do make one mistake on a regular basis – I overestimate the common man, and in particular, I underestimate the degree to which a third of the male sex was born with female personality and cognitive traits. (“Men without chests”)

    -“Even your follow up opinion is wrong”-

    And you respond with a cognitively female expression of disapproval in the absence of testifiable argument rather than a male expression of truth or falsehood by use of a testifiable argument. … Like I said. I don’t err.

    -“And you continue to miss the point”-

    Again: female cognitive bias from female personality traits by avoiding questions of truth or falsehood. My point is, and will remain, that the sexes demonstrate marginal indifference in task processing other than preference but vast differences in intuition and accountability in social and political performance. (It’s the science). So you have to ask yourself why you’re lying and denying,evading and ad hom, disapproval instead of argument. The reason is, as I stated because you’re demonstrating cognitively female traits – not education, information, cognitive, and testimonial discipline. And you continue to miss the point: Truth permits reciprocal exchange. Truth evasion avoids reciprocity and produces a race to the bottom. There is a reason for western civilization’s historical hyper innovation and adaptation: “Truth Before Face Regardless of Cost.” So in simple terms, you’re a social tax evader. Failing to pay the normative and behavioral tax of truth before face regardless of cost, that is necessary for the jury, for rule of law, for democracy,and for the high trust society that produces disproportionate economic velocity.

  • Example of When Men Argue as Women – and Explaining Why It Matters

    EXAMPLE OF WHEN MEN ARGUE AS WOMEN – AND EXPLAINING WHY IT MATTERS

    -“Even your opinions wrong.”- a hostile

    I pretty much never err. It’s my job not to. I do make one mistake on a regular basis – I overestimate the common man, and in particular, I underestimate the degree to which a third of the male sex was born with female personality and cognitive traits. (“Men without chests”)

    -“Even your follow up opinion is wrong”-

    And you respond with a cognitively female expression of disapproval in the absence of testifiable argument rather than a male expression of truth or falsehood by use of a testifiable argument. … Like I said. I don’t err.

    -“And you continue to miss the point”-

    Again: female cognitive bias from female personality traits by avoiding questions of truth or falsehood. My point is, and will remain, that the sexes demonstrate marginal indifference in task processing other than preference but vast differences in intuition and accountability in social and political performance. (It’s the science). So you have to ask yourself why you’re lying and denying,evading and ad hom, disapproval instead of argument. The reason is, as I stated because you’re demonstrating cognitively female traits – not education, information, cognitive, and testimonial discipline. And you continue to miss the point: Truth permits reciprocal exchange. Truth evasion avoids reciprocity and produces a race to the bottom. There is a reason for western civilization’s historical hyper innovation and adaptation: “Truth Before Face Regardless of Cost.” So in simple terms, you’re a social tax evader. Failing to pay the normative and behavioral tax of truth before face regardless of cost, that is necessary for the jury, for rule of law, for democracy,and for the high trust society that produces disproportionate economic velocity.

  • @Bangoob There are many ways to influence a population by means of suggestion. T

    @Bangoob There are many ways to influence a population by means of suggestion. The suggestion of competence, insight, or authority that feeds the tendency of traumatized people to suspect conspiracies, and to respond with moral indignation inspiring and justifying their righteous retaliation is one of the best methods of all.

    To the degree someone may have had signal intelligence inside the white house – we might claim that was indeed a possibility. To the degree that it was used to promote inspiration agitation, hope, and cope was a possibility.

    To the degree that there was any organization of common interest within the administration or the state to support it appears to have been unlikely. Had such an organization of common interest existed, the failure of the capitol raid to deliver demands that would justify their action leaves the responsibility on the activists.

    So my assessment at present is the most skeptical: that it was an agitprop joke or test, that turned into a movement, because it got traction for the reasons I stated above.

    I didn’t follow it although I did have people actively keeping me informed. From that information, I didn’t see anything that wasn’t constructivist (causal relations were implied not demonstrated). The only evidence I’ve seen is that one individual may have had access to spaces and communications. There are plenty of low-level people in that information stream. I don’t want to dismiss the phenomenon or try to refute it because the momentum is valuable. I don’t want to claim it’s supportable because there is no information that makes it supportable.

    If it turns out to be something more I would be pleasantly surprised. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 16:14:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105645556441843329

  • EXAMPLE OF WHEN MEN ARGUE AS WOMEN – AND EXPLAINING WHY IT MATTERS -“Even your o

    EXAMPLE OF WHEN MEN ARGUE AS WOMEN – AND EXPLAINING WHY IT MATTERS

    -“Even your opinions wrong.”- a hostile

    I pretty much never err. It’s my job not to. I do make one mistake on a regular basis – I overestimate the common man, and in particular, I underestimate the degree to which a third of the male sex was born with female personality and cognitive traits. (“Men without chests”)

    -“Even your follow up opinion is wrong”-

    And you respond with a cognitively female expression of disapproval in the absence of testifiable argument rather than a male expression of truth or falsehood by use of a testifiable argument. … Like I said. I don’t err.

    -“And you continue to miss the point”-

    Again: female cognitive bias from female personality traits by avoiding questions of truth or falsehood. My point is, and will remain, that the sexes demonstrate marginal indifference in task processing other than preference but vast differences in intuition and accountability in social and political performance.

    (It’s the science). So you have to ask yourself why you’re lying and denying,evading and ad hom, disapproval instead of argument. The reason is, as I stated because you’re demonstrating cognitively female traits – not education, information, cognitive, and testimonial discipline.

    And you continue to miss the point: Truth permits reciprocal exchange. Truth evasion avoids reciprocity and produces a race to the bottom. There is a reason for western civilization’s historical hyper innovation and adaptation: “Truth Before Face Regardless of Cost.”

    So in simple terms, you’re a social tax evader. Failing to pay the normative and behavioral tax of truth before face regardless of cost, that is necessary for the jury, for rule of law, for democracy,and for the high trust society that produces disproportionate economic velocity.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 15:48:22 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105645454301901640

  • Again: female cognitive bias from female personality traits by avoiding question

    Again: female cognitive bias from female personality traits by avoiding questions of truth or falsehood. My point is, and will remain, that the sexes demonstrate marginal indifference in task processing other than preference but vast differences in intuition and accountability.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 15:31:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355539104461688834

    Reply addressees: @nicholaspiccari @drvolts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355538132305924102