Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Sexual market value: genetics(health: symmetry, neural adaptability(iq),fitness)

    Sexual market value: genetics(health: symmetry, neural adaptability(iq),fitness), sexual dimorphism, morphological sex ratio(shape), neoteny(domestication, pedomorphism), gracility(gracile form), fertile age range. ie: even at margins, races maintain expected sexual market value.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-06 17:37:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1368254538327670790

    Reply addressees: @patchyplacing @jonathanmizero @Winstxnmarley @missbajju

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1368250356845735941

  • Yes, we know what consciousness consists of.

    Of course we know what consciousness consists of. We’ve known for at least the past ten years. The effort of teaching the average person enough neurology so that can they understand it is a bit of work, but I’m producing a course on it, and the research is all out there. Even a populist like Michio Kaku answers the question. Kuhn makes a living NOT answering the question of consciousness, and interviewing marginal characters (mostly old folks) and many of whom are intellectually embarrassing (philosophers and theologians) – thereby preserving the supernatural bias in the majority population while satisfying curiosity among both materialists, idealists, and supernaturalists. Roger Penrose has a particular strength in that he follows einstein and uses mental models in addition to his mathematics. But otherwise, Roger is a mathematical platonist. Most physicists are stuck in what we call ‘mathiness’ – no mental model. The research on consciousness is done today by those of us who rely on both neurology and computer science to reproduce it. In simple terms, consciousness is just the merger of sensation with memory of memory into a competitive set of predictions. Qualia is just a vast parallel hierarchy of variations on embodiment. Consciousness is simple. Most of our brain predicts a continuously updated (revised) world model, then indexes salient experiences as episodes, and predicts candidate episodes from a competition between episodes, and we regulate that function with attention. When people say consciousness is an illusion that implies an observer that doesn’t exist. The only observer is a hierarchy of memory that we perceive as constant, just like we perceive movies as constant. The root “you” is in the brain stem that’s concerned about orientation, homeostasis, and reward-seeking. All the “you” in the sense you know yourself is distributed around the neocortex as memories. The experience of being you is integrated across the brain and organized into the hippocampal region. Qualia is rather trivial to explain from there onward. If you were to ask if other species would experience the same qualia we can only say that their qualia would be understandable if they were at least able to communicate at our level. But that vibrations in the universe whether through solids, gasses, space, and from subsonic to sonic to electromagnetic, would be the same. Some people see impossible colors even today. Some are color blind. A different creature might experience time differently (faster or slower), or instead of having two hemispheres might have, four, or six, or eight (or more) – and that would be the only substantive difference. But to ACT in the real world generates demand for convergence on similar range of senses and qualia.

  • Yes, we know what consciousness consists of.

    Of course we know what consciousness consists of. We’ve known for at least the past ten years. The effort of teaching the average person enough neurology so that can they understand it is a bit of work, but I’m producing a course on it, and the research is all out there. Even a populist like Michio Kaku answers the question. Kuhn makes a living NOT answering the question of consciousness, and interviewing marginal characters (mostly old folks) and many of whom are intellectually embarrassing (philosophers and theologians) – thereby preserving the supernatural bias in the majority population while satisfying curiosity among both materialists, idealists, and supernaturalists. Roger Penrose has a particular strength in that he follows einstein and uses mental models in addition to his mathematics. But otherwise, Roger is a mathematical platonist. Most physicists are stuck in what we call ‘mathiness’ – no mental model. The research on consciousness is done today by those of us who rely on both neurology and computer science to reproduce it. In simple terms, consciousness is just the merger of sensation with memory of memory into a competitive set of predictions. Qualia is just a vast parallel hierarchy of variations on embodiment. Consciousness is simple. Most of our brain predicts a continuously updated (revised) world model, then indexes salient experiences as episodes, and predicts candidate episodes from a competition between episodes, and we regulate that function with attention. When people say consciousness is an illusion that implies an observer that doesn’t exist. The only observer is a hierarchy of memory that we perceive as constant, just like we perceive movies as constant. The root “you” is in the brain stem that’s concerned about orientation, homeostasis, and reward-seeking. All the “you” in the sense you know yourself is distributed around the neocortex as memories. The experience of being you is integrated across the brain and organized into the hippocampal region. Qualia is rather trivial to explain from there onward. If you were to ask if other species would experience the same qualia we can only say that their qualia would be understandable if they were at least able to communicate at our level. But that vibrations in the universe whether through solids, gasses, space, and from subsonic to sonic to electromagnetic, would be the same. Some people see impossible colors even today. Some are color blind. A different creature might experience time differently (faster or slower), or instead of having two hemispheres might have, four, or six, or eight (or more) – and that would be the only substantive difference. But to ACT in the real world generates demand for convergence on similar range of senses and qualia.

  • This isn’t an ‘opinion’ or a ‘preference’ or an ‘ambition’. it’s a law of evolut

    This isn’t an ‘opinion’ or a ‘preference’ or an ‘ambition’. it’s a law of evolutionary biology, a law of nature, and it will never, ever change. If we discuss race differences we are discussing conflicts due to kin preference under different genetic distributions. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1368239207882297353

  • Clarifying: Sex value of Race(neoteny) will exist. Kin bias will exist. Power-se

    Clarifying: Sex value of Race(neoteny) will exist. Kin bias will exist. Power-seeking by kin bias will exist. But differences in political demand by kin preference are due to differences in size of classes. ie; only groups w/ same class sizes, same culture, reduce kin friction. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1367994890911678464

  • The opposite, b/c the end of the pseudoscientific anti-Darwinian movement. IQ, S

    The opposite, b/c the end of the pseudoscientific anti-Darwinian movement. IQ, Sex, Class, Race differences are all true. BUT, largely due to delta in underclass size and resulting culture – so a CLASS, kin-preference, culture, immigration, indoctrination, problem – not race.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-06 00:26:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1367994890911678464

    Reply addressees: @StuartJRitchie @mariachong @C_Kavanagh

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092196859672739840

  • Someone forwarded this to me despite it being old, but let’s deal with the truth

    Someone forwarded this to me despite it being old, but let’s deal with the truth:
    1) Intentional postwar anti-Darwinian ban on the research program.
    2) Impossibility of studying the subjects in University b/c of it.
    3) Impossibility of a forming dissertation committee (I Tried)


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-06 00:14:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1367991967515353089

    Reply addressees: @StuartJRitchie @C_Kavanagh @mariachong

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1092194376829362177

  • RT @DegenRolf: Even in Sweden, one of the most gender equal countries in the wor

    RT @DegenRolf: Even in Sweden, one of the most gender equal countries in the world, responses to a preferential treatment policy based on g…


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-05 17:10:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1367885176911585286

  • (Increased mental illness)

    (Increased mental illness)


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-04 20:54:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1367579146432503808

    Reply addressees: @Jane89811150 @ThruTheHayes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1367572725888335888

  • (a) female (b) useful idiot (c) using the female method of evasion-of-argument:

    (a) female (b) useful idiot (c) using the female method of evasion-of-argument: undermining (d) where that’s the Left’s method of destroying reputation, information, cooperation, institutions of cultural production (d) by social construction of denial of the laws of the universe.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-03 13:31:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1367105239950712833

    Reply addressees: @jordanbpeterson @helenlewis

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1367102473429807110