Each of us develops a homeostatic state of experience (consciousness) that is some mixture of hyperfocused on reality, fully present in reality, pondering that presence, daydreaming influenced by stimulation from that presence, and an imaginary world only tangential to it.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-16 22:55:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383192329863958532
Empathic-Intuitionistic-Preferential(Female)
………<-Balanced ->
…………………Systematizing-Empirical-Rational(Male)
We aren’t kidding when we call you bots, or NPC’s. https://t.co/dfi1uildBN
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-16 22:37:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383187830143336450
Reply addressees: @CruzControl72 @ariana_erbon @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383182081648427008
That doesn’t mean anything. The female brain, produces a cognitive bias, just like the homo-heterosexual produces attraction biases. Antifa, Theology, Method of Argument, are inescapable traits of the female mind. You think you have free will. You don’t. Intuition rules a bot.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-16 22:31:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383186425370251265
Reply addressees: @CruzControl72 @ariana_erbon @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383182081648427008
That’s because the entire cortext evolved out of the region of the brain stem that organizeds a body model. Everything in our brain is an evolutoin of movement. Some thoughts just only require recursion (thinking) not the release of movement.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-16 21:58:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383178113840992259
Reply addressees: @cometaj2 @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383176630638546945
But we have to be able to predict possible actions. All disambiguation ends in a competition for action, and actions are calculated along with the disambiguation.We aren’t like computers processing info. But that organizes wiring that turns on the corresponding chrsitimas lights.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-16 21:57:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383177806004297734
Reply addressees: @cometaj2 @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383176630638546945
Not really. Most of what our brain does (sixth sense so to speak) is to cdreate a spatial model from visual perception. So we ‘see’ what the camera sees, but it’s not disambiguated into others, objects in movemnet, objects, spaces, and borders. To make it actionable…
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-16 21:55:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383177304109637643
Reply addressees: @cometaj2 @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383176630638546945
That wasn’t a criticism. And women chase me because of dominance expression, competitive ability, charisma, and humor. Just is. Deal. 😉
Women know the truth. They just can’t say it and defect against the mean girls and the betas (you) that submit to the mean girls.
Really.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-16 20:52:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383161359915962375
Reply addressees: @CruzControl72 @ariana_erbon @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383149063516880900
The big problem with MBTI is that the test isn’t large enough. I tend to favor it for ordinary folks because it’s about the limit of their ability to work with. I was taught a similar method with thirty or so personality archetypes and that was even better.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-15 19:15:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1382774574090174465
Reply addressees: @Claffertyshane
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1382774258070392833
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Claffertyshane Sorry. I don’t really know Jung well. I just go with the data. And I’m competent in Predictive Index, MBTI, Big5, and the other tests. The interesting observation is that the ladies got pretty close with jung – they’re only ‘off’ on ‘agreeableness’ (feeling). So pretty good.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1382774258070392833
Sorry. I don’t really know Jung well. I just go with the data. And I’m competent in Predictive Index, MBTI, Big5, and the other tests. The interesting observation is that the ladies got pretty close with jung – they’re only ‘off’ on ‘agreeableness’ (feeling). So pretty good.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-15 19:14:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1382774258070392833
Reply addressees: @Claffertyshane
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1382772251976732672
You can normalize a database down to 1’s & 0’s. You can normalize human behavior down to a very small number of factors. That’s what’s annoying. It’s dehumanizing to realize we’re bots. And consciousness is necessary only for imitation, sympathy, and empathy, and cooperation.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-15 18:38:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1382765276647809028