Rationality: bounded rationality of rational choice.
Agency: limiting choices to the empirical not the intuitive
Objective: accounting for costs.
Sexes diverge as we change from indifference in task, to vast difference in moral, political, strategic.
Yes we have the science.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-22 03:28:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385072894183673856
Reply addressees: @MSmoothens
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385065757797756928
Happy to argue your case, but you’ll find our that I’m correct. It will require a little exposition of the term rational, of the difference in empathizing and systematizing, and how male and female behavior varies at scale. But I’ll be correct, brecause the science is rock solid.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-22 02:30:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385058331253948422
Reply addressees: @MSmoothens
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385051090526277637
11) But back to basics: 4+ generations of H Sapiens, 10+ IQ points per generation. relative similarity at same iq – at least over 125. But (a)the mean remains (b)regression to mean remains (c) aggression diff remains (e) if african 65iq not broken. If white/asian 65 then broken. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1384754341597306881
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-21 13:32:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1384862652283883521
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1384754341597306881
why the game theory movement ran out of gas:
A game can only be played within the limits of the actors. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-21 00:37:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1384667510545555464
Reply addressees: @bryanbrey @ThruTheHayes @WorMartiN @LukeWeinhagen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1384664664785580036
Reiterating that in many areas of society, economy, and politics, that female trait expression is valuable becasue it is less defensive of commons (capital). Whereas male trait expression is defensive of commons. But turn on female aggression and they consume or destroy commons. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1384624458275639296
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-20 22:10:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1384630478108610566
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1384624458275639296
It’s the failure to account for human sexual opportunism – including nearly anything with a hole – that opens the door to misrepresentation. So we can ‘lie’ a bit, and pretend that the races do not represent a hierarch of sexual neoteny and so desirability, and use subspecies. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1384625542247424000
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-20 21:52:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1384625977398026241
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1384625542247424000
So the fundamental difference between humans of 125+ IQ narrows rapidly, but the behavior groups due to variation in the reproductive, status, economic, and class value of the generations (races) remains due to the median of the distribution. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1384623468348645377
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-20 21:43:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1384623801380519937
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1384623468348645377
P-Law is not ideology, or ideology, or philosophy, it’s behavioral science. The difference is that unlike the physical sciences, people can remember, choose, cooperate or not, and lie, cheat, steal, harm, murder or war as well as cooperate. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1384621770582470656
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-20 21:37:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1384622397786107904
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1384621770582470656
Group differences in IQ DO have a genetic component – because group differences consist of increases in domestication syndrome (neoteny) in groups, determining the scal of the right of the curve. Although the group mean is determined by the agrarian underclass size reduction.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-20 02:32:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1384334034973642752
Reply addressees: @gmukunda @sullydish @rasmansa
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383982378121449481
The reason we can use court rooms, or we can even imitatate, sympathize, and empathize with one another, is because we can grasp other’s incentives.
We all follow incentives.
Hence why every leftist idiot thinks they can do better. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1384180716645208065
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-19 16:23:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1384180981507104777
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1384180716645208065