RT @DegenRolf: Meta-analysis: People with nice personality traits achieve a lower income. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/laedte/202106.html https://t.co/QXURqyCgfC
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-24 09:03:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385882089422213120
RT @DegenRolf: People who became successful at work became less neurotic. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001879121000543 https://t.co/TSOlKkxMcn
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-24 08:54:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385879734379241476
RT @DegenRolf: Sex differences in deceptive self-presentation on social media – with men puffing up their achievements and women their look…
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-24 08:53:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385879632977842179
Hmmm… not sure that’s true. we explain others behavior but science says we can’t even predict our own. I think you mean we an sympathize with incentives. I’m not sure you mean state of mind?
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-23 21:59:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385715066109104140
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385714499282407424
You can’t testify to the state of mind nor predict another’s behavior
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-23 20:21:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385690225637220353
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385689896979996672
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @sergei_ivan @curtdoolittle Developing agency is the counter to weakness.
Developing competence is the counter to help…
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-23 16:51:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385637407605800963
Next, you will double down on evasion, denial, and disapproval, and if that is frustrated, resort to GSRRM, becuase that is the female means of conflict. https://t.co/AOK7WXYFKI
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-22 03:38:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385075386795630593
Reply addressees: @MSmoothens
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385073473383510017
You just demonstrated a female trait of deceit in order to obscure disapproval. So yes the science exists. Reducing that spectrum of variations to three points on a tweet, is not the same as enumerating thousands of research studies.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-22 03:33:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385074304451231746
Reply addressees: @MSmoothens
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385073473383510017
That said, sex differences are also distributed on a curve such that we have feminine male minds and masculine female lines although empathy-systematizing apperas constant.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-22 03:32:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385073907393249280
Reply addressees: @MSmoothens
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385072894183673856
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MSmoothens Rationality: bounded rationality of rational choice.
Agency: limiting choices to the empirical not the intuitive
Objective: accounting for costs.
Sexes diverge as we change from indifference in task, to vast difference in moral, political, strategic.
Yes we have the science.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1385072894183673856
women are highly succeptible to the NAXALT fallacy and others as questions scale. Men see distributions, women a flat line. This is due to the organizaton of our brains in utero dividing the labor of systematizing (politics, econ, war) vs empathizing (interpersonal, children)
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-22 03:30:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385073602622537729
Reply addressees: @MSmoothens
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1385072894183673856
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MSmoothens Rationality: bounded rationality of rational choice.
Agency: limiting choices to the empirical not the intuitive
Objective: accounting for costs.
Sexes diverge as we change from indifference in task, to vast difference in moral, political, strategic.
Yes we have the science.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1385072894183673856