I think the mistake everyone is making is that the brain wires together, between sensors, and predictions from sensors, and is largely organizing and predicting, by wiring not by information transfer. So computers can’t wire so they simulate wiring by logical association.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-13 14:54:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1392855657796325376
(Is it just me or is the English South converging with American midland pronunciation (other than o and r)? AM is the ‘tv anchor’ pronunciation. Was midlantic but that’s been all but eradicated by decline in demographic composition.)
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-12 22:31:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1392608364425777154
Men stay with women the same way women with their children. Even if alienated, the sentiment remains.
“Men are more sentimental than women”
More illustration of NOW (female) THEN (male).
It’s a beautiful thing IF YOU WORK TOGETHER ON IT.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-12 16:35:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1392518682975346689
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1392511070653362182
I dunno. The risk is always there at the beginning. But once you understand ‘he’s too emotionally costly(mommy’s boy)’ or ‘she’s too financially costly(gold digger)’ those are substantial costs. I loved one woman deeply but the psychological cost was too high.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-12 15:53:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1392508298218328068
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1392504307623374853
When I start a relationship I try to determine what will make the woman ‘feel safe’. Discovering that, adapting to it, and bringing about the conditions usually take me from one to almost two years. The problem is, the emotional, psychological, economic, costs can be too high.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-12 15:15:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1392498599460839427
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1392496826721390595
They are hardwired for sexual opportunism just as women for reproductive opportunism – two different things. That’s very different from either party abandoning the family relationship and investments. (economics in everything)
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-12 15:07:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1392496561813393411
Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1392495677368852483
Terminology problem: Men are romantic, women want to be romanced. Two different things. Women seduce they don’t romance.
I think devotion emergest as distinct from loyalty as (a) familism and tribalism decrease, (b) economic dependence of women on men decreases. Otherwise, there are incentives. Now the only incentive is friendship.
We must decide whether that is good or different incentives better.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-12 14:58:36 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106222814231666041
Men you know are more dangerous than men you don’t. B/c the primary reason for male violence is women. Re: of murders of women, 16% random, 29% known, 51% by a current or former lover, and 4% his friends or family. Given 14% black vs 68% white: black is 282% more likely.
What this means is that Avg IQ = Size of Bottom Class = Predictable hierarchy of racial differences in violence – and that this problem is impossible to solve economically and will grow progressively worse over this century as even more no-low skill (rate of learning) jobs end.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-12 14:57:59 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106222811846854741
We have the science on the sex differences in cognition and the physical constitution of those differences in cognition, and not surprisingly they confirm thousands of years of sexual stereotypes, continuing the falsification of the leftist (feminine) century of pseudoscience.
If we disambiguate Rule (Rule of Law), State (defense), Government (administration) and Politics (production of commons) then it’s not so much that women are unfit for politics but that they are unfit for rule, defense, and government, but fit for caretaking: a secular church.
I use the word “politics” because in P-Law there exists no such thing as ‘legislation’ that has process legitimacy, only ‘contracts of the commons’ – which must adhere to natural law. The only ‘overide’ is the monarchy to restore rule of law, or the military in time of war.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-12 14:56:38 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106222806526238363
Sort of. It’s baiting the opposing party into demonstrating competence. I know the opposing party lacks that competence. I know that the female method of argument is to conflate approval/disapproval with knowledge/ignorance so I know she’s ‘lying’.
Source date (UTC): 2021-05-12 03:39:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1392323427625803781
Reply addressees: @grayzonewarlord @bitcornfarmer1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1392322936166567937