Probably. But I’m not sure it’s monodimensional, nor the direction of causality. I work with Face and Truth consistently, b/c truth = rate of innovation/ adaptation/ evolution. But I haven’t really “scienced” the other dimensions.
Thanks for giving me more work to do. lolz 😉
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-24 02:30:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1485439722826735617
Reply addressees: @BitchesLoveX
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1485437768943685632
PAPER: https://www.scholars.northwestern.edu/en/publications/dignity-face-and-honor-cultures-a-study-of-negotiation-strategy-a
Also, links to topics on group differences in negotiation – which is where cultural differences are most evident, because they express demonstrated interests not reported intests. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1485431652339924993
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-24 02:12:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1485435403595362304
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1485431652339924993
Q: “What if any alternatives to Dignity and Honor Culture exist?”
1) Face Culture
2) Victim Culture
So: Victim, Face, Honor, Dignity Cultures
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-24 01:57:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1485431652339924993
(Female tendency to confuse agreement with truth)
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-23 03:28:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1485091956317462528
Reply addressees: @joenjann32 @oswaldspangled
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1485090844898394121
Female cognition evolved for a reason and that reason is the polar opposite of the male. And while the male consists largely of over-time-space-and-scale the female is exactly the opposite. Empathic now vs Systemic Then,and we are mutually blind to the temporal division of labor.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-23 03:10:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1485087549529985026
Reply addressees: @MaryMort9 @gaiawriter
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1485086826113216521
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MaryMort9 @gaiawriter I know the data as well or better than anyone living. And what we have discovered over the past century of experimentation is far worse than the patriarchic presumption of our ancestors. And the present asset of pomo-pc-woke via women has just proven an ancient argument.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1485086826113216521
I know the data as well or better than anyone living. And what we have discovered over the past century of experimentation is far worse than the patriarchic presumption of our ancestors. And the present asset of pomo-pc-woke via women has just proven an ancient argument.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-23 03:07:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1485086826113216521
Reply addressees: @MaryMort9 @gaiawriter
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1485086344443531269
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MaryMort9 @gaiawriter Secondly, you are conflating the usual attempt to normalize sex differences in cogntion by assuming that a technical innovation of marginal indifference within one’s sphere of competency extends beyond that sphere of competency. This is common for men and almost never in women.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1485086344443531269
Secondly, you are conflating the usual attempt to normalize sex differences in cogntion by assuming that a technical innovation of marginal indifference within one’s sphere of competency extends beyond that sphere of competency. This is common for men and almost never in women.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-23 03:05:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1485086344443531269
Reply addressees: @MaryMort9 @gaiawriter
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1485085981560786949
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MaryMort9 @gaiawriter Sympathies, but you just demonstrated my point. The female mind’s tendency to result to NAXALT reasoning in response to a general rule(normal distribution). We have been searching for seventy years for just one woman capable of systematizing (theoretical) ability – and it’s zero.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1485085981560786949
Sympathies, but you just demonstrated my point. The female mind’s tendency to result to NAXALT reasoning in response to a general rule(normal distribution). We have been searching for seventy years for just one woman capable of systematizing (theoretical) ability – and it’s zero.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-23 03:04:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1485085981560786949
Reply addressees: @MaryMort9 @gaiawriter
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1485084323942662144
@Sargonofakkad100@Timcast@lotuseaters_com SARGON: The male-conservative axis places intolerance, loyalty-hierarchy, and purity-disgust (pack) as a higher value than female-consumptive tolerance, inclusiveness-equality (herd). This leads to purity spiraling in the community that prevents the libertarian, centrist, rightist side of right-male spectrum from organizing around a strategy. In other words, these nitwits virtue signal by pissing on minor differences in means of organizing. This is why the left wins. They are more cohesive (herd) than the right (packs).
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 17:08:37 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661552362695012
This is the problem with the female bias in cognition. Fundamentally it’s politically and economically destructive because it sacrifices all for temporal hyperconsumption, and attempts at prohibiting the concentration of capital over hyperconsumption.
Women don’t invent anything. https://twitter.com/LukeWeinhagen/status/1484566752453345284
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 16:42:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1484567129257033728
https://twitter.com/LukeWeinhagen/status/1484566752453345284