Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • CREATIVITY : ITS AUTISM – AND IT ISNT A DISEASE ITS AN ADAPTATION New research p

    CREATIVITY : ITS AUTISM – AND IT ISNT A DISEASE ITS AN ADAPTATION

    New research provides the first physiological evidence that real-world creativity may be associated with a reduced ability to filter “irrelevant” sensory information.

    The literary great Marcel Proust wore ear-stoppers because he was unable to filter out irrelevant noise — and lined his bedroom with cork to attenuate sound.

    Now new Northwestern University research suggests why the inability to shut out competing sensory information while focusing on the creative project at hand might have been so acute for geniuses such as Proust, Franz Kafka, Charles Darwin, Anton Chekhov and many others.

    The Northwestern research provides the first physiological evidence that real-world creativity may be associated with a reduced ability to filter “irrelevant” sensory information.

    The research suggests that some people are more affected by the daily bombardment of sensory information — or have “leakier” sensory filters.

    “Leaky” sensory gating, the propensity to filter out “irrelevant” sensory information, happens early, and involuntarily, in brain processing and may help people integrate ideas that are outside of the focus of attention, leading to creativity in the real world, said Darya Zabelina, lead author of the study, calling the finding “impressive.”

    The researchers investigated specific neural markers of a very early form of attention, namely sensory gating, indexed by P50 ERP, the neurophysiological response that occurs 50 ms (milliseconds) after stimulus onset, and how it relates to two measures of creativity: divergent thinking and real-world creative achievement.

    In the study, approximately 100 participants reported their achievements in creative domains via Creative Achievement Questionnaire, as well as performed a test of divergent thinking, generally considered to be a laboratory test of creative cognition. On this test participants were asked to provide as many answers as they could to several unlikely scenarios, within a limited amount of time. The number and the novelty of participants’ responses comprised the divergent thinking score. As a result, the researchers had two different measures of creativity: a number of peoples’ real-world creative achievements and a laboratory measure of divergent thinking.

    Divergent thinking tests are timed laboratory measures of creative cognition, in which participants produce numerous responses within a limited time. In the study, divergent thinking correlated with academic test scores and selective sensory gating — an increased ability to filter compared to lower divergent thinkers.

    In direct contrast, real-world creative achievement was associated with leaky sensory processing — or a reduced ability to screen or inhibit stimuli from conscious awareness. This shows that these creativity measures are sensitive to different forms of sensory gating. Divergent thinking does contribute to creativity, but appears to be separate from the process of creative thinking that is associated with the leaky sensory filter.

    The study suggests that creative people with “leaky” sensory gating may have a propensity to deploy attention over a wider focus or a larger range of stimuli.

    “If funneled in the right direction, these sensitivities can make life more rich and meaningful, giving experiences more subtlety,” said Zabelina, a Ph.D. candidate in psychology at Northwestern.

    But the downsides to such sensory distraction have been well noted by some of the world’s most creative thinkers.

    One of the most influential novelists of the 20th century, Kafka once said, “I need solitude for my writing; not ‘like a hermit’ — that wouldn’t be enough — but like a dead man.” Darwin, Chekhov and Johan Goethe also strongly lamented the distracting nature of noise.

    The study cannot yet determine whether reduced sensory gating is a stable trait, or if creative achievers can modulate their sensory processing depending on task demands.

    Story Source:

    The above story is based on materials provided by Northwestern University. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.

    Journal Reference:

    Darya L. Zabelina, Daniel O’Leary, Narun Pornpattananangkul, Robin Nusslock, Mark Beeman. Creativity and sensory gating indexed by the P50: Selective versus leaky sensory gating in divergent thinkers and creative achievers.Neuropsychologia, 2015; 69: 77 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.034


    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-08 00:56:00 UTC

  • MEN VS WOMEN Jihadi John’s father wants him dead and to burn in hell. Ted Bundy’

    MEN VS WOMEN

    Jihadi John’s father wants him dead and to burn in hell. Ted Bundy’s mother loved her son and denied his crimes until the day she died. Sigh….


    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-06 02:43:00 UTC

  • (worth repeating) Star Trek is what you get if you suppress the breeding of the

    (worth repeating)

    Star Trek is what you get if you suppress the breeding of the underclasses for four hundred years, and raise the median IQ to our equivalent of 122 (one and a half standard deviations).

    Brazil is what you get if you don’t.

    Pakistan is what you get if you lose your aristocracy, and encourage inbreeding.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-02 14:08:00 UTC

  • Gold Diggers are the Wife Beaters of Men

    Gold Diggers are the Wife Beaters of Men.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0gaYyNk7QA


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-28 10:35:00 UTC

  • “Yin and Ying are not merely a social construct.”— James Santagata

    —“Yin and Ying are not merely a social construct.”— James Santagata


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-23 00:07:00 UTC

  • THE WAR ON SOCIAL SCIENCE Left off the cover was: 1. Human differences don’t exi

    THE WAR ON SOCIAL SCIENCE

    Left off the cover was:

    1. Human differences don’t exist

    2. IQ isn’t real

    3. There’s no such thing as human nature

    4. Capitalism doesn’t work


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-22 09:29:00 UTC

  • “Women possess intrinsic value simply be “being”. At an early age and continuing

    —“Women possess intrinsic value simply be “being”. At an early age and continuing up until 32 years old, everyday is a girl’s birthday. Attention is lavished, doors are held open, free drinks, dinners and compliments given and so on. Then the decline begins, albeit slowly before accelerating. Men on the other hand, have no intrinsic value in “being” and can only create their value by “building”. Men are left to their own devices – from birth – to face the crucible, and many don’t make it. But as their value is appraised by what they build, their value appreciates with age and even when the peak is hit, they decline in value slowly. …….. Money is Men’s Botox. …….. Cash flow is a Man’s Fountain of Youth.”—

    James Santagata

    What has changed is that men, through their building, have made it possible for women to also build. So men must build and provide a marginal difference in order to be valuable. And fewer of them can.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-22 05:21:00 UTC

  • “Video games, pot, and fluoride destroy men.”—Don Finnegan

    —“Video games, pot, and fluoride destroy men.”—Don Finnegan


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-21 14:30:00 UTC

  • FAMILY IS, LIKE LAW, A PRECIOUS BUT ARTIFICIAL CONSTRUCT That must be protected,

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/report-just-17-black-teens-live-with-parents-54-for-whites-both-low-marks/article/2560151THE FAMILY IS, LIKE LAW, A PRECIOUS BUT ARTIFICIAL CONSTRUCT

    That must be protected, or the consequences for civilization are catastrophic.

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/report-just-17-black-teens-live-with-parents-54-for-whites-both-low-marks/article/2560151


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-21 07:34:00 UTC

  • a couple of centuries or so. Is that really enough time to effect that much gene

    http://pic.twitter.com/EUQafiYnlX—“…just a couple of centuries or so. Is that really enough time to effect that much genetic change according to your theory?”—

    “Yes:

    “One of the simplest models of directional selection, truncation selection, where the bottom (or top) x% for a trait fail to reproduce is easy to model and produces something that closely fits observed situations.

    “Say those 1 standard deviation below average for a trait fail to reproduce – roughly the bottom 16%. (In terms of numbers, this isn’t far off from the fraction of people that fail to reproduce in modern America.)

    “The breeder’s equation gives us the selective effect:

    “[R = h^2 * S]

    “R = response to selection (mean of trait in following generation. S = selection differential (mean of trait of parental population). h^2 = additive heritability of trait.

    “If we assume those 1 s.d. below average fail to reproduce, then the mean of the parental population (assuming trait in question is normally distributed) is the mean of truncated bell curve cut at -1 s.d. which you can find (with some…fancy math) to be +0.29 sd.

    “Since the additive heritability of most traits is 0.5, the response to selection in that case is 0.29 * 0.5 = 0.145 sd/generation. If this were IQ, that would correspond to a ~2.2 point gain per generation. Assuming sustained selection, the population mean would move one whole standard deviation in just 7 generations (or about 200 years)! I mentioned IQ, but this will work just as well for any quantitative trait with a similar additive heritability, including the personality traits associated with a fine manorial serf – which you [could] model collectively as a ‘manorial quotient’ (MQ).”

    …and here…

    “The World Values Survey gives us a neat way to quantify overall mean clannishness around the world:

    Based on #WVS data: Welzel-Inglehart Cultural Map 2015. pic.twitter.com/EUQafiYnlX

    — World Values Survey (@ValuesStudies) January 26, 2015

    “It’s even mapped in standard deviations.

    “Outbreeding has produced an evolutionary shift to the right (maybe to the upper right) for NW Euros on this map. If we assume they started about where the Slavs are now, that means they moved +2 or +3 s.d. over the course of the relevant evolutionary time. Such a change (given the case of strong, sustained directional selection) could take as little as 400-600 years, given the formula above.”


    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-21 07:26:00 UTC