Woman: “Woman’s job is to love. That is all. You should not expect more of her. She does not know more herself.”
Thank god there are sane women left in this world. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-07 06:19:00 UTC
Woman: “Woman’s job is to love. That is all. You should not expect more of her. She does not know more herself.”
Thank god there are sane women left in this world. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-07 06:19:00 UTC
@hbdchick What relationship is there between loyalty and pair-bonding? Between IQ, Impulsivity, loyalty and pair-bonding? Same driver?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-05 17:59:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/706177252338311168
PAIR BONDING VS LOYALTY
( HBD_Chick and Rachael Colleen )
What is the relationship between pair bonding and loyalty?
We know all groups demonstrate loyalty. It varies only in the nearness of relations, from offspring, to kin, to those we cooperate with, to abstract moral commitment. In other words, we demonstrate kin selection and cooperation selection, and potential cooperation selection, and all else is open to competition, parasitism or predation.
In other words, is clannishness / pair bonding a discreet behavior in itself, or is it another defense of ‘property’ that we call ‘loyalty’. Are we just protecting investments?
Is it the case that the more different we are the more valuable is pair bonding? The more similar we are (the more dim we are) the less value is pair bonding? I mean, we know people are attracted to similar value judgements.
Is there a relationship between iq and pair bonding?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-05 05:16:00 UTC
One can be wise because of life’s lessons. Or one can possess traits of the wise despite lacking those lessons.
The wise recognize the behavior no matter how it was learned: by accident or by trial and error.
It matters not your age it matters only that you possess humility and discipline.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-04 16:23:00 UTC
The problem with 10’s is that they are so saturated with attention that you can’t get through the noise with genuineness.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-04 16:06:00 UTC
It’s pretty clear to me that the high conflict territories export lower intelligence greater impulsivity higher aggression and faster rates of reproduction. and only westerners and the far east asians resisted it: through non-integration.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-25 01:58:00 UTC
Or better said: Race Maters (only) Because of Class Distributions; So eliminate differences in class distributions and race doesn’t matter.
We can still demonstrate natural kin affinity but race stops being a political problem when the lower classes are not advocating for their elites to obtain privileges for them. Conversely, elites cannot use race to cause political division if underclasses do not exist.
I get in trouble with the right because I’m not a racist. But I’m not. I’m definitely a classist. But aristocracy round the world gets along just fine. It’s our underclasses that cause all the issues.
Now we encounter one problem that is fairly obvious upon reflection: that armies require the underclasses. And those without armies cannot hold territory. The only alternative has been the use of professional warriors who are themselves an expensive class.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-25 01:57:00 UTC
THIS IS HOW TO SAY IT:
The empathy necessary for cooperation invites suggestion. The harder we work at cooperation, the more empathy we must expend. The more trusting the more empathic. The more empathic a society the more vulnerable to suggestion, Ergo the greater suppression of suggestion is necessary for continuing trust expansion.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-25 01:36:00 UTC
Unregulated woman is as dangerous as unregulated man. Her time scale is just slower.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-24 06:15:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/702376173800706049
Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke @MartianHoplite @voxday @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/700082425616056320
IN REPLY TO:
@PoseidonAwoke
Hey @curtdoolittle , @MartianHoplite, @voxday, @StefanMolyneux
Brilliant analysis: Why women destroy civilization:
https://t.co/S6abiYbMeF
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/700082425616056320
However, weaponized reproduction can defeat weaponized calculation if let loose.
Source date (UTC): 2016-02-24 06:13:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/702375861434109952
Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke @MartianHoplite @voxday @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/700082425616056320
IN REPLY TO:
@PoseidonAwoke
Hey @curtdoolittle , @MartianHoplite, @voxday, @StefanMolyneux
Brilliant analysis: Why women destroy civilization:
https://t.co/S6abiYbMeF
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/700082425616056320