Peak Human: Gould was right. Intelligence is a weak, expensive advantage. Reproduction and aggression win. An 80 IQ is optimum for both.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-13 04:48:00 UTC
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
either way we argue not right or wrong but reproductive strategy. That is all th
… either way we argue not right or wrong but reproductive strategy. That is all that is playing out.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 15:47:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708680776305532928
Reply addressees: @SteveFriess @ThomasEWoods
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708680406556647424
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@SteveFriess @ThomasEWoods Argument to relativism. Argument to distraction. Sensation(impulse) and sense(reason) are opposites….
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/708680406556647424
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@SteveFriess @ThomasEWoods Argument to relativism. Argument to distraction. Sensation(impulse) and sense(reason) are opposites….
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/708680406556647424
-
The fallacy of the anglo aristocracy of everyone is illustrated by the demand fo
The fallacy of the anglo aristocracy of everyone is illustrated by the demand for reason from those who lack it.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 15:32:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708676942946504705
Reply addressees: @ThomasEWoods @SteveFriess
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708672716648255489
IN REPLY TO:
@ThomasEWoods
.@SteveFriess If I believed something very sincerely and passionately, I wouldn’t adopt a strategy that obviously undermined it.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708672716648255489
-
What Steve means is that some people pursue their genetic interests impulsively,
What Steve means is that some people pursue their genetic interests impulsively, and others rationally. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 15:30:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708676603702853632
Reply addressees: @SteveFriess @ThomasEWoods
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708672422816432128
IN REPLY TO:
@SteveFriess
.@ThomasEWoods that’s *your* “strategy.” Some people don’t choose their activities on strategy – they do it on what they believe.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708672422816432128
-
You do not understand the language of conservatism. He is speaking moral languag
You do not understand the language of conservatism. He is speaking moral language. Ask Jon Haidt what that means…
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 15:23:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708674697517527041
Reply addressees: @JamesFallows @delong
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708432821916979201
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708432821916979201
-
Represents IQ distribution, Conflict Tolerance, Time in the Workplace, and caree
Represents IQ distribution, Conflict Tolerance, Time in the Workplace, and career preference.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 14:49:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708666157868445697
Reply addressees: @wef @JonasPrising
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708657624770875394
IN REPLY TO:
@wef
How to be a male feminist at #work @JonasPrising https://t.co/s4sFOKJd0O https://t.co/hXzkec5hgd
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708657624770875394
-
THE PROBLEM OF INTELLIGENCE Those who have no ability but are aware enough to re
THE PROBLEM OF INTELLIGENCE
Those who have no ability but are aware enough to resent it: 80’s
Those who can learn by imitating others: 90’s
Those who can learn by reading the words of others: 100’s
Those who can master calculations and judge the words of others: 110’s
Those who can master independent research without instruction: 120’s
Those who can synthesize and communicate ideas: 130’s
Those who can invent new ideas: 140’s
Yet this this transition from knowledge accumulation to knowledge production does not make all of life. It merely tells us that in any distribution of people that there are difficult limits to overcome in the construction of a harmonious, survivable, and competitive polity.
PS: I believe this is the correct method of describing differences in intelligence.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-10 23:32:00 UTC
-
My point is almost always the same. All the good people come from suppressing th
My point is almost always the same. All the good people come from suppressing the reproduction of the bad people, just as all trust comes from suppressing theft, just as all truth comes from eliminating the false and deceptive.
Eliminate the bad and false and only the good and the true can remain.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-10 22:17:00 UTC
-
Typically, the seven stages of grief are described as: – Shock or Disbelief – De
Typically, the seven stages of grief are described as:
– Shock or Disbelief
– Denial
– Anger
– Bargaining
– Guilt
– Depression
– Acceptance and Hope
Very Feminine. Typical Freudian psychologizing. “Acceptance”
The Masculine : “Change”
– from shock
– to disbelief
– to sadness and depression
– to rage and anger
– to judgement
– to resolution
– to inquiry
– to plan
– to action
– to determination
– to conquest or defeat.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-10 04:26:00 UTC
-
we are always genetic and biologically motivated. We never convince anyone. We j
we are always genetic and biologically motivated. We never convince anyone. We just sell them a new means of profiting
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-08 20:39:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/707304880558501889
Reply addressees: @retroch @soapjackal
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/707304427468800001
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/707304427468800001