Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Q&A: HOW DO YOU PROPOSE WE RESTORE EUGENICS? —You wrote earlier about the diff

    Q&A: HOW DO YOU PROPOSE WE RESTORE EUGENICS?

    —You wrote earlier about the differences in races being, in part, a difficulty for certain peoples to cull the lower classes. Would you be in favour of an organized plan of eugenics in order to correct this?—

    I advocate that we are not conducting a trade with the lower classes, and harming our civilization and mankind.

    They have nothing to trade in the market, and we do not permit or assist them in exit, yet we make the pay the high behavioral costs of observing private and public property rights. So I advocate we pay them rather than demand payment for nothing in return. I have no problem paying people for demonstrating normative behaviors, and perhaps participating in the maintenance of the commons. And restricting to one child and no immigration below graduate level education is sufficient within just a few generations to hollow out the lower classes. Especially if we literally pay educated women in above 106 to have children. Demographics produce deterministic results. We aren’t equal. And worse, the people at the bottom are ‘worse’ or all of us than the people at the top are ‘good’ for all of us.

    This is just true. Enough lies. We’ve not completely domesticated the planet. In fact, we’ve only domesticated a small piece of it, and we’re reducing that three-thousand year effort every day.

    But we will have to use direct violence, rather than indirect reproductive violence to negotiate that exchange.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-15 07:07:00 UTC

  • Q&A: A GENTLE EUGENICS? –What is the gentlest way to restrain underclass reprod

    Q&A: A GENTLE EUGENICS?

    –What is the gentlest way to restrain underclass reproduction?–

    The gentlest way to restrain underclass reproduction is to be honest about it, transfer from services to direct redistribution, and to make redistribution contingent on single child reproduction, and offer free sterilization after the fist birth, and require sterilization of those with severe histories in the family (we have studies on this it’s pretty obvious stuff).

    And secondly to limit immigration to those with IQ’s 125 and above.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-15 06:30:00 UTC

  • Nope. That’s not right at all. Genders and classes are unequal, but compatible a

    Nope. That’s not right at all. Genders and classes are unequal, but compatible and mutually necessary. Leave lies to the left.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-14 07:01:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/764718465383014400

    Reply addressees: @ramzpaul

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/761382956447387648

    IN REPLY TO:

    @ramzpaul

    In the #AltRight we need to fight against class distinctions. Some of the most capable and intelligent men I met are blue collar workers.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/761382956447387648

  • WHY DO ASPIES CREATE SUCH COMPLETE MODELS (SYSTEMS)? Actually, its for pretty ob

    WHY DO ASPIES CREATE SUCH COMPLETE MODELS (SYSTEMS)?

    Actually, its for pretty obvious reasons.

    Aspieness (intense world-ers) all behave a little differently but with definite similarity:

    – Individual, intense, interests and experiences – hyper-interest.

    – Thinking in, speaking in, living in, ‘drawers’, not ‘the moment’. –

    – Lacking general consolidated experience (feeling/opinion) normals possess (consolidated human reactions are not present). – ‘cluelessness’.

    – Less sense of ‘self’ and ability to ‘judge’ because of that experience. -weaker identity

    – Some difficulty empathizing with others emotional states.

    – Frustration with social rejection despite desperate desire for it.

    We try to build a world out of one of our intense frames to compensate for our lack of identity and a synthesized frame.

    Sort of the opposite of solipsistic women who can’t separate themselves from reality, we cannot connect ourselves with reality,and try to recreate a model of reality, because there is no ‘self’ we can make value judgments aganst otherwise.

    I don’t consider this a defect, but a necessary talent for a human population, expressible as a sort of specialization.

    We like each other, but we understand also, that despite liking each other, that normals are pretty desirable things.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-13 07:39:00 UTC

  • We cannot ever allow women (r selection) to dictate our genetics (k selection) b

    We cannot ever allow women (r selection) to dictate our genetics (k selection) because (a) it is the males who generate evolutionary change, and (b) women prefer to mate for aggression and impulsivity, which is contrary to the ability of a people to evolve increasingly complex societies.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-13 05:18:00 UTC

  • What if there are no possible futures you desire? What if none you can tolerate?

    What if there are no possible futures you desire? What if none you can tolerate? None you can survive?

    This is the problem of the combination of market economy and unregulated reproduction, and the destruction of the family.

    The market can solve the provision of incentives. But it cannot solve the problem of insufficient demand for human labor of any skill level.

    We can have capitalism and wealth only with reproductive limitations.

    We can have involuntary organisation ( North Korea) and unregulated reproduction and poverty.

    Or we can have a voluntary order for those capable of participating and an involuntary order for those not able to participate. And we can regulate reproduction.

    But then what we have today creates for many, an intolerable or unsurvivable world.

    But you have the left push for policies of dysgenia and the right for policies of eugenics and neither is honest about the reasons they push for policies.

    R selection destroys as certainly as war, disaster, plague and famine.

    They are not kind they are cruel. We are not cruel we are moral.

    The resin we fail is that we do not reduce all our problem to this one question?

    If bearing children creates a moral hazard then how can one claim it is a right and not predation?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-12 10:24:00 UTC

  • Is it true that your intended family is the only one that you can actually count

    Is it true that your intended family is the only one that you can actually count on in the end? https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-that-your-intended-family-is-the-only-one-that-you-can-actually-count-on-in-the-end/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=1a2ead68

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-11 06:58:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/763630727829348352

  • I don’t hate on people. It’s not helpful. Protect your own but don’t attack othe

    I don’t hate on people. It’s not helpful. Protect your own but don’t attack others. It’s bad for the market so to speak.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-11 06:45:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/763627314487918592

    Reply addressees: @mfckr_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/763626838509752320

    IN REPLY TO:

    @mfckr_

    @curtdoolittle I’ve no way of knowing in advance how some statist’s demented brain might later construe something I say as ‘hate speech’.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/763626838509752320

  • In looks are white women at a disadvantage to Latino women?

    In looks are white women at a disadvantage to Latino women? https://www.quora.com/In-looks-are-white-women-at-a-disadvantage-to-Latino-women/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=a56ae653

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-11 06:23:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/763621828543873024

  • looks are white women at a disadvantage to Latino women?

    https://t.co/3uAKXKwbxjIn looks are white women at a disadvantage to Latino women?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-11 02:23:00 UTC