HINT: ALL PSYCHOLOGICAL TERMS ARE LIES, JUST AS ALL RELIGIOUS TERMS ARE LIES. HUMANS SEEK TO ACQUIRE IN FURTHERANCE OF THEIR REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY. EVERYTHING ELSE IS POSTURING AND NEGOTIATION. The only thing that differs is our reproductive strategy: Gender, Class, Age, Race. Jessa Faya Alexander —“How about: Empaths seek connection, Sociopaths seek power; your results may vary”—
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
Psychological Terminology Was Invented to Lie.
Curt Doolittle To experience the feeling of “connection: is a impulsive MEANS to an evolutionary END. That women tend to be incognizant of the ends that they pursue by seeking their emotions is simply to say that they are less human and more animal than men. A sociopath(ends) like an empath(means) can pursue either moral ends or immoral ends. There is no moral difference between immoral sociopaths(ends) and immoral empaths (means). Just as there is no moral difference between moral sociopaths(ends) and moral empaths(means). The difference lies only in animal impulse and lying about, and human reason and telling the truth of it. -
Psychological Terminology Was Invented to Lie.
HINT: ALL PSYCHOLOGICAL TERMS ARE LIES, JUST AS ALL RELIGIOUS TERMS ARE LIES. HUMANS SEEK TO ACQUIRE IN FURTHERANCE OF THEIR REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY. EVERYTHING ELSE IS POSTURING AND NEGOTIATION. The only thing that differs is our reproductive strategy: Gender, Class, Age, Race. Jessa Faya Alexander —“How about: Empaths seek connection, Sociopaths seek power; your results may vary”—
Curt Doolittle To experience the feeling of “connection: is a impulsive MEANS to an evolutionary END. That women tend to be incognizant of the ends that they pursue by seeking their emotions is simply to say that they are less human and more animal than men. A sociopath(ends) like an empath(means) can pursue either moral ends or immoral ends. There is no moral difference between immoral sociopaths(ends) and immoral empaths (means). Just as there is no moral difference between moral sociopaths(ends) and moral empaths(means). The difference lies only in animal impulse and lying about, and human reason and telling the truth of it. -
The Why of Shrinking Brains
SHRINKING BRAIN SIZE, PAEDOMORPHIC SELECTION, OR FASTER REPRODUCTION OF THE UNDERCLASSES? http://www.ancient-origins.net/…/scientists-are-alarmed-shr… Given that (a) yes, brain size makes a demonstrable difference in current human intelligence.
And given that (b) it’s unclear whether our brains are getting smaller or whether more of the smaller humans are breeding in cities. (which appears to be the case since cities are genetic and IQ sinks). And given that (c) we have been selecting for immaturity for 10K years (paedomorphic selection). And given that (d) women generally possess superior verbal skills and weaker modeling skills despite smaller brains. I would hypothesize that all of the above are driving down AVERAGE brain size. I would suggest we will saw additional paedomorphic selection domestication up and until the period of ‘Peak Human’ which I suspect was around 1500 bc. And that at present we are seeing a rapid expansion of dysgenic classes, tilting the data dramatically. Unfortunately I suspect that the initial shift caused by the adoption of general rules (science) rather than rules of specific cases (recipes), as well as the reduction in the malnutrition at the bottom (left) of the curve, means that the downward shift in genetic IQ and brain size from underclass reproduction is being hidden by the Flynn effect. But in real terms, on average we are getting smaller, more verbal brains, and a lot more dumb people breeding. Curt Doolittle -
The Why of Shrinking Brains
SHRINKING BRAIN SIZE, PAEDOMORPHIC SELECTION, OR FASTER REPRODUCTION OF THE UNDERCLASSES? http://www.ancient-origins.net/…/scientists-are-alarmed-shr… Given that (a) yes, brain size makes a demonstrable difference in current human intelligence.
And given that (b) it’s unclear whether our brains are getting smaller or whether more of the smaller humans are breeding in cities. (which appears to be the case since cities are genetic and IQ sinks). And given that (c) we have been selecting for immaturity for 10K years (paedomorphic selection). And given that (d) women generally possess superior verbal skills and weaker modeling skills despite smaller brains. I would hypothesize that all of the above are driving down AVERAGE brain size. I would suggest we will saw additional paedomorphic selection domestication up and until the period of ‘Peak Human’ which I suspect was around 1500 bc. And that at present we are seeing a rapid expansion of dysgenic classes, tilting the data dramatically. Unfortunately I suspect that the initial shift caused by the adoption of general rules (science) rather than rules of specific cases (recipes), as well as the reduction in the malnutrition at the bottom (left) of the curve, means that the downward shift in genetic IQ and brain size from underclass reproduction is being hidden by the Flynn effect. But in real terms, on average we are getting smaller, more verbal brains, and a lot more dumb people breeding. Curt Doolittle -
WOMEN ARE CAPABLE OF RATIONAL THOUGHT. MEN ARE CAPABLE OF RESPONSIBLE THOUGHT. I
WOMEN ARE CAPABLE OF RATIONAL THOUGHT. MEN ARE CAPABLE OF RESPONSIBLE THOUGHT.
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154785265992264
ITS HARDER FOR WOMEN TO FIND MEN TO TRUST
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154785328047264
A FATHER NEEDS TO BE THE ONE MAN A WOMAN CAN TRUST
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154788310172264
THIS TRUST ISSUE MIGHT BE VERY IMPORTANT
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154790756607264
I NOTICE THE TRUST THING EVERYWHERE
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154810769102264
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-09 21:17:00 UTC
-
BRAIN SIZE, PAEDOMORPHIC SELECTION, OR FASTER REPRODUCTION OF THE UNDERCLASSES?
http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-evolution-human-origins/scientists-are-alarmed-shrinking-human-brain-001446SHRINKING BRAIN SIZE, PAEDOMORPHIC SELECTION, OR FASTER REPRODUCTION OF THE UNDERCLASSES?
http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-evolution-human-origins/scientists-are-alarmed-shrinking-human-brain-001446
Given that (a) yes, brain size makes a demonstrable difference in current human intelligence.
And given that (b) it’s unclear whether our brains are getting smaller or whether more of the smaller humans are breeding in cities. (which appears to be the case since cities are genetic and IQ sinks).
And given that (c) we have been selecting for immaturity for 10K years (paedomorphic selection).
And given that (d) women generally possess superior verbal skills and weaker modeling skills despite smaller brains.
I would hypothesize that all of the above are driving down AVERAGE brain size.
I would suggest we will saw additional paedomorphic selection domestication up and until the period of ‘Peak Human’ which I suspect was around 1500 bc.
And that at present we are seeing a rapid expansion of dysgenic classes, tilting the data dramatically.
Unfortunately I suspect that the initial shift caused by the adoption of general rules (science) rather than rules of specific cases (recipes), as well as the reduction in the malnutrition at the bottom (left) of the curve, means that the downward shift in genetic IQ and brain size from underclass reproduction is being hidden by the Flynn effect. But in real terms, on average we are getting smaller, more verbal brains, and a lot more dumb people breeding.
Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-09 20:11:00 UTC
-
Ever since I made the statement that women have a far harder time knowing which
Ever since I made the statement that women have a far harder time knowing which men to trust I see it FREAKING EVERYWHERE.
I had a strange conversation with a woman today and I kept thinking “she can’t be that stupid” but then a man got involved and I explained it to him and it was fine. I think women understand each other’s devious motives, but I think women really have no idea at all when they look at men, and listen to us. How do we read? Do we read that we’re scary? What? I don’t get it.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-09 20:00:00 UTC
-
“A man’s war uses violence, a woman’s war uses gossip.”—Felicity J. Sharpe
—“A man’s war uses violence, a woman’s war uses gossip.”—Felicity J. Sharpe
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-09 15:02:00 UTC
-
Romance is for chicks. Fiction is for chicks. Religion is for chicks. Buddhism i
Romance is for chicks. Fiction is for chicks. Religion is for chicks. Buddhism is for chicks. Relationships are for chicks. Feelings are for chicks.
War is for men. History is for men. Philosophy is for men. Stoicism is for men. Alliances are for men. Facts are for men.
Science, Law, and Exchange are for resolving our differences.
Marriage is the optimum means of compromise.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-09 09:43:00 UTC
-
HINT: ALL PSYCHOLOGICAL TERMS ARE LIES, JUST AS ALL RELIGIOUS TERMS ARE LIES. HU
HINT: ALL PSYCHOLOGICAL TERMS ARE LIES, JUST AS ALL RELIGIOUS TERMS ARE LIES. HUMANS SEEK TO ACQUIRE IN FURTHERANCE OF THEIR REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY. EVERYTHING ELSE IS POSTURING AND NEGOTIATION.F
The only thing that differs is our reproductive strategy: Gender, Class, Age, Race.
Jessa Faya Alexander
—“How about: Empaths seek connection, Sociopaths seek power; your results may vary”—
Curt Doolittle
To experience the feeling of “connection: is a impulsive MEANS to an evolutionary END. That women tend to be incognizant of the ends that they pursue by seeking their emotions is simply to say that they are less human and more animal than men. A sociopath(ends) like an empath(means) can pursue either moral ends or immoral ends. There is no moral difference between immoral sociopaths(ends) and immoral empaths (means). Just as there is no moral difference between moral sociopaths(ends) and moral empaths(means). The difference lies only in animal impulse and lying about, and human reason and telling the truth of it.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-07 12:22:00 UTC