Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • SERIES Limit Ethics: Toddler Hero Ethics: Youth Virtue Ethics: Teen Deontologica

    SERIES

    Limit Ethics: Toddler

    Hero Ethics: Youth

    Virtue Ethics: Teen

    Deontological Ethics: Adult

    Teleological: Ethics: Maturity

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-19 10:16:00 UTC

  • PETERSON: INVOLUNTARY PROGRAMMING DOOLITTLE/HARRIS: VOLUNTARY CHOICE

    PETERSON: INVOLUNTARY PROGRAMMING

    DOOLITTLE/HARRIS: VOLUNTARY CHOICE

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-19 10:12:00 UTC

  • I feign stupidity all the time. How else do I bait people into ‘educating me’ an

    I feign stupidity all the time. How else do I bait people into ‘educating me’ and thereby exposing themselves to study?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-19 09:25:00 UTC

  • I wrote a very important if long piece the other day. it was one of my early dra

    I wrote a very important if long piece the other day. it was one of my early drafts. I was showing the relationship between the very simple three factor model of emotions, and the three factor model of incentives, and the five factor model that is commonly used in psychology. And I don’t think very many people noticed it.

    But if you have that model, property in toto, and the six dimensions to falsify under testimonialism, the intertemporal division of gender and cognitive labor, the three modes of coercion, the methods of communication from existential to supernatural, the use of common law for the purpose of incremental suppression, the transaction cost theory of government, and the use of truth to justify various group evolutionary strategies, our western use of sovereignty and the unavoidable production of markets in all walks of life, and therefore the necessity of markets in the production of commons and polities, then you have the major criteria – the framework, for explaining ALL human phenomenon in objective, amoral, rationally comparable terms.

    What I had not realized was how severely the animals in the pit drag the humans back down with them.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-17 22:21:00 UTC

  • DO WE NEED THE UNDERCLASSES TO FIGHT FOR US? NO. THIS IS GOING TO UPSET YOU THE

    DO WE NEED THE UNDERCLASSES TO FIGHT FOR US? NO.

    THIS IS GOING TO UPSET YOU THE AVERAGE IQ IS: 106. MEANING THE 65TH PERCENTILE. MEANING THE (GENETIC) WORKING AND MIDDLE CLASSES.

    So quite differently from what the underclass supposes, they are dead military weight as well as dead political weight, as well as dead economic weight as well as dead social weight. As far as I can tell, below 95, you’re dead weight on humanity, and any value you have in the military, political, economic, and social organizations of society is simply displacing the young and ignorant, and the old and tired from fulfilling work in the service of self and others.

    sure, it’s possible to do menial labor, and not be a problem, but basically below 95, everyone is dead weight. Why?

    95 to learn by (costly) repetition – and use machines and equipment.

    105 to learn by instruction – and to repair machines – and speak ideas clearly.

    115 (college) to learn by self reading

    125 (graduate) to learn by self investigation

    135 to interpret and distill information for others to learn by.

    145 to innovate purely in ideas.

    Honestly I can’t see a lot of difference over 145 in practical terms, because at that point it seems that your discipline, general knowledge, and time devoted to innovation are more influential than additional intelligence. (although I can be wrong). For example, i can tell that Hayek and I are similar in many ways, and I can tell that Chomsky and Wittgenstein have superior verbal abilities (substantially) – but they were both wrong. And when I read the works of other people I think are very bright It seems to me that they have more discipline than I do. (and less autism). So what does that mean?

    From what I can see, there is no reason why we could not breed up to 125 median without encountering consequences I do not yet know how to deal with. But my observation of english history and jewish history is that the closer you get to 115 median, the closer you get to social, economic, political, and military nirvana so to speak. I am not sure that without technological enhancements we do much better than that with homo sapiens sapiens.

    —“the military is the greatest middle class redistribution system in America”— (forget his name at the moment)

    VIA SAILER:

    —“Following the latest John Kerry brouhaha, a reader asked what the average IQ of U.S. military personnel is. From table 2.8 of the is Department of Defense document, I estimate that the average for new enlisted men in 1998 was about 105.

    This would be in the 60th to 65th percentile compared to all the young people in America when the Armed Forces Qualification Test was normalized in 1980 on the National Longitudinal Study of Youth’s sample of 13,000 people ages 15-23. (This is the same enormous study that provides the data in Section 2 of The Bell Curve.)”—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-17 19:17:00 UTC

  • I AM A CLASSIST BECAUSE I AM A SCIENTIST AND NO OTHER OPTION SURVIVES

    I AM A CLASSIST BECAUSE I AM A SCIENTIST AND NO OTHER OPTION SURVIVES.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-17 13:45:00 UTC

  • “the answer to women’s agency is enabling good behaviour and punishing bad”—Je

    —“the answer to women’s agency is enabling good behaviour and punishing bad”—Jennifer Scharf

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-17 11:51:00 UTC

  • HUMAN “NATURAL TENDENCY” IS TO TAKE RATIONAL ACTION. We are moral when to our ad

    HUMAN “NATURAL TENDENCY” IS TO TAKE RATIONAL ACTION.

    We are moral when to our advantage, amoral when to our advantage and immoral when to our advantage.

    And while even the most simple of mathematical questions, and the most basic of logical demands can challenge us, we are masters of calculation of social status, and the change in it produced by our moral, amoral, and immoral actions.

    As population increases and density increases, our anonymity increases, and therefore our ability to obtain our wants amorally or immorally without costing us social status, increases.

    Ergo, In small groups with meaningful competition we see higher morality. As competition decreases we see increases in immorality. As anonymity increases through greater population we see greater increases in immorality.

    Hence our universal tendency to develop interpersonal and local reputations, normative habits traditions, and rules, religious habits, traditions, rules and limited records (births, christenings, marriages, deaths; legal habits, traditions rules and more informational records; insurance habits, traditions, rules and much more informational records (titles etc); and, credit habits, traditions, rules and vastly more informational records; and now ‘data’ based methods of incomprehensible records of our behaviors, wants, wishes, and biases.

    All of these forms of expectations of one another, and records of our actions function as do the rest of our tools – whether logical, legal, craftsmanly, technological, scientific – to allow us to perceive, remember, compare, and judge, that which we cannot judge without the assistance of those tools alone.

    But in the end, the human being does what he must: act rationally in his self interests without imposing such a cost on his social status (reputation) that he either reduces opportunities for cooperation with others, eliminates opportunities for cooperation with others, or is such a threat to the cooperation of others, or a threat to the life property kin, and opportunities of others, that he is ostracized, enslaved, imprisoned, or killed.

    Man is a rational actor. His reason may not be evident, because he calculates intuitively his physical, emotional, and intellectual costs, in addition to his costs of opportunity, and his costs of material resources. And unfortunately, physical underdevelopment, emotional underdevelopment, and intellectual underdevelopment for the context in which he lives are high costs for some to bear. And as such they are insufficiently domesticated an animal for participation in society except as ostracized, slave, prisoner – and sometimes his best participation is his death.

    Curt Doolittle

    The The Propertarian Institute,

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-17 11:51:00 UTC

  • “Every role of society requires some level of agency. The A word you want to use

    —“Every role of society requires some level of agency. The A word you want to use here is “accountability” the problem is that women are being propagandized on the notion that they are immune to consequences when acting as an agent. Or better put, not informed of natural consequences. That and we are shamed for wanting to follow our biological inclination of wanting to be objectified.”— Anne Tripp

    (brilliant) (please share)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-17 11:48:00 UTC

  • CLASSISM NOT RACISM Reminder. You wanna talk about differences in the distributi

    CLASSISM NOT RACISM

    Reminder. You wanna talk about differences in the distributions of ability between genders, classes, tribes, nations, and races, or between laws, ideologies, philosophies, religions, and civilizations, then I am all for it. But I am a CLASSIST and NATIONALIST not a RACIST, and I talk about solutions for us not criticisms of others. So sorry, I love my kin above all others, but that does not equate to the hate of others. It merely says that in all choices I do not permit the externalization of any cost upon my kin by others and their kin, because this violates Natural Law of reciprocity by which ALL tribes, races, and nations can ascend – as long as they continuously limit the size of their underclasses.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-17 11:45:00 UTC