Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • ARE YOU MAN, MANLET, OR WOMAN? Do you seek truth to exercise your agency, or exc

    ARE YOU MAN, MANLET, OR WOMAN?

    Do you seek truth to exercise your agency, or excuse, or license for your lack of agency?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 12:07:00 UTC

  • The Virtues that are not false, cause transcendence, not acquiescence. If you cl

    The Virtues that are not false, cause transcendence, not acquiescence.

    If you claim a false virtue you just claim that you are weak – You don’t claim a virtue.

    So don’t.

    Just state that you can only transcend so far, because you are weak.

    Weakness is only a problem if you prohibit the transcendence of others.

    If you do so, then you are also a parasite, and therefore not virtuous.

    It’s not complicated.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 11:03:00 UTC

  • YOU ARE WEAK The Romantic. The Intuitive. The Spiritual. The Occult. Just be hon

    YOU ARE WEAK

    The Romantic. The Intuitive. The Spiritual. The Occult.

    Just be honest. You’re a woman. And you need the comforting lies of a woman.

    Because you aren’t sovereign. You aren’t a man. You haven’t transcended.

    You can’t rely on reason alone.

    There is only one good. Transcendence.

    The rest is just useful or not, preferable or not. true or false.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 11:01:00 UTC

  • by Michael Churchill Logical problem: If the core of woman’s survival strategy i

    by Michael Churchill

    Logical problem: If the core of woman’s survival strategy is duplicity, and if in the Propertarian paradigm, duplicity will be outlawed, will not women be reduced to serfs?

    How will they be able to flower and be their full selves if they are barred from use of duplicity?

    It seems to me they will sidle up to alphas and treat them well. And the status of betas will be raised and so more betas will be seen as attractive as well.

    But this all presupposes that this community could be brought into being within a larger political entity (i.e. the US) when said larger entity is hostile to it.

    You’re basically asking to be Waco’ed unless you go seriously esoteric in your doctrines inside the community.

    (CURT: I think the concepts of esotericism evolve as marketing (justification) in response – they are not the product)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 06:28:00 UTC

  • IQ TESTOSTERONE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RACIAL ADMIXTURES (worth repeating)

    IQ TESTOSTERONE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RACIAL ADMIXTURES

    (worth repeating)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 08:35:00 UTC

  • THE HUMAN BRAIN AS A PROPERTY ENGINE (worth repeating)

    THE HUMAN BRAIN AS A PROPERTY ENGINE

    (worth repeating)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-10 08:34:00 UTC

  • OMG THIS IS AN UNPLEASANT QUESTION? (Asking a controversial question…. If a gr

    OMG THIS IS AN UNPLEASANT QUESTION?

    (Asking a controversial question…. If a group of people selectively bred for feminine traits in males sufficiently to transfer female brain structure and therefore female verbal ability to males, then is it possible that the psychosis and much higher frequency of mental illness in females would be transferred to males, and when manifested in male sexual impulses result in increased frequency of incidents of perversion (lack of impulse control) in males? And what groups, if any demonstrate this set of traits?)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 18:15:00 UTC

  • Women buy of you what you have sold to men. It is other men’s treatment of you t

    Women buy of you what you have sold to men. It is other men’s treatment of you that determines your value to women. You don’t sell women. You sell men, and women buy using that measure.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 11:59:00 UTC

  • EDUCATION IS CRUEL TO BOYS AND MEN It’s F—KING CRUEL to put black kids in the

    EDUCATION IS CRUEL TO BOYS AND MEN

    It’s F—KING CRUEL to put black kids in the same classrooms and taught the same way as whites and asians.

    Hell, it’s cruel to whites to put them in the same classroom with asians. I mean, asian kids are amazing right out out of the womb. My son (very scandianvian, bigger, stronger, more aggressive) nearly got kicked out of school. Not because he exercises dominance. But because he won’t tolerate dominance of him – and will do something about some annoying kid who dominates him in noisiness, word, or action.

    The more rapid the maturity and the deeper the maturity the higher the ratio of physical exercise to classroom teaching is necessary to NOT produce brain damage in boys.

    The more experiential the girls, the more team sports are necessary so that girls are socialized so that they can learn to manage their emotions.

    I mean think of all the damage this postmodernism in education does to our people!!!!

    There was a point I wanted to open an inner city school for black men just so I could prove that the problem is entirely solvable by teaching everything physically instead of in-situ.

    ALmost all boys benefit from Military school with a lot of sports.

    Almost all girls benefit from any individual or team sport.

    Civilization consists of the suppression of animal impulse and the direction of dominance to the war and market rather than each other.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 10:09:00 UTC

  • CURT: WHAT ARE JUVENILIZATION, NEOTENY, AND PEDOMORPHISM? —“What is juveniliza

    CURT: WHAT ARE JUVENILIZATION, NEOTENY, AND PEDOMORPHISM?

    —“What is juvenilization?”—

    Look up Paedomorphism and Neoteny: selection for immaturity. The same way we select for immaturity and produce dogs from wolves, we produce white civlization and chinese civlization by selection for immaturity.

    In different regions of the globe, there is a greater advantage to fast maturity due to the fragility of the young and the high incidences of mortality. In other reasons there is no advantage to fast maturity and selection for juvenile traits is not a disadvantage. the same applies for simple and complex social orders.

    Juvenilizatoin is nearly impossible for africans because of the disease gradient in their region, and a bit harder in the other hot climates for similar reasons.

    If you select for Neoteny you will get a big head, a smaller body, and finer facial features. If you do not you will get smaller heads, and stronger facial features.

    As we can see in our ape cousins, humans evolved from prior states primarily through neoteny, which gave us higher heat dissipation, which gave us our most important (and often uncredited) advantage: we can form a pack using pointy-things, and run-down any life form on earth. We cannot run fastest but we can run longer than any other life form. We also gained time. time to ‘consider’. And with consideration time to judge between impulse and reason.

    Once we developed modern humans (all apes are white by the way, and blackness is an adaptation to sun exposure on the skin), we could then adapt modern humans to environments – some assisting us in further neoteny, and others in surviving hostile environments. Some bigger some smaller. Some with deeper maturity some with less. Some more social some less social – and so on.

    In other words, yes, some subraces are far more ‘advanced’ genetically than others. and some are not very advanced at all.

    But the fact remains that all races consist of a distribution, and there is substantial overlap. So the principle issue is kin selection given the distributon of the subrace. In other words, we always act as kin, and kin require norms that suit the supermajority in the center of the distribution, and this is the problem of conflictd between peoples with different distributions.

    You don’t see problems with east asians and whites.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 03:50:00 UTC