Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • GROUP: LOYALTY AND BETRAYAL The central problem for any group, of any size, is t

    GROUP: LOYALTY AND BETRAYAL

    The central problem for any group, of any size, is to maximize all opportunities with positive externalities (loyalty) without tolerating the taking of opportunities with negative externalities (defection). Loyalty matters. There is always a limit to opportunism – in everything: trade, marriage, mating. And this is what corporatism licenses: defection (betrayal). Low trust peoples profit best when they can live among high trust peoples and exploit the difficulty of measuring betrayals through moral hazard internally, and defection and betrayal externally. Liberty, free trade, globalism. These are all terms for licensing betrayal. And maybe that is surprising. These three words propose moral falsehoods in order to betray the group. Rule of Law by Natural Law with Full Accounting leads to the same conditions as liberty, free trade, and globalism, but it forbids negative externalities against the group no matter how small. The question has never been what form of government do we need in order to construct a condition free of impositions upon us by others. That form of government is Nomocracy: Rule of Law under Natural Law. Every other form of government is just some other method of condoning one form of betrayal of the group or another.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-18 13:00:00 UTC

  • OUR COMPATIBILITY Women signaling with virtue-talk and men signaling with trash-

    OUR COMPATIBILITY

    Women signaling with virtue-talk and men signaling with trash-talk. Women shaming as if their approval mattered, and men threatening is if their disapproval mattered.

    We are perfectly compatible. All sound and fury, signifying nothing. With the occasional outlying compromises seized and quickly consumed before the ape-chatter starts anew.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-17 19:59:00 UTC

  • ( It’s logical, but WAGS are waaay hotter than all but a few models, and actress

    ( It’s logical, but WAGS are waaay hotter than all but a few models, and actresses. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 22:46:00 UTC

  • You have to kill off a lot of ‘stupid’ You have to breed for neoteny (big heads

    You have to kill off a lot of ‘stupid’

    You have to breed for neoteny (big heads and finer bodies).

    You have to get enough of the IQ in the verbal spectrum by transfer of feminine traits to males, without transferring male traits to females, or feminizing males.

    Then you need to kill off even more stupid.

    Then you need to redistribute reproduction upward to those that you’ve produced.

    You will get german/nordics (bigger/heavier), slavs (bigger/lighter), and Celts(smaller/lighter) out of this process in the west. In the Han, well, they just have one population that persisted in the heartland, rather than the Polish-Ukrainian population that kept exporting waves into the european plain.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 18:41:00 UTC

  • EQ/IQ IS NONSENSE It’s all iq. It’s just that women and men differ in their pers

    EQ/IQ IS NONSENSE

    It’s all iq. It’s just that women and men differ in their personalities and therefore ‘specializations’.

    The more you do, the better you get.

    We do more of what’s easier for us.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 17:43:00 UTC

  • WE have a huge population of smart indians in america. But that’s because of who

    WE have a huge population of smart indians in america. But that’s because of who immigrated in the tech community. But in proportion to their ‘reserves’ of IQ, it doesn’t ‘make a dent in their home population.

    Take Ireland during the famine and lose everyone capable of exiting.

    Take america and add 100M africans, caribbeans, and amerindians.

    It’s not like we don’t have dumb as a rock white people. We do. The problem is that the chinese and whites killed off more of our stupid than anyone else did.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 17:41:00 UTC

  • REALITY DENIERS IN EVERY POPULATION We have our lunatic SJW’s and Religious nuts

    REALITY DENIERS IN EVERY POPULATION

    We have our lunatic SJW’s and Religious nuts, and so does every other population. The average IQ of a population and the number of generations since they began the enlightenment, will determine what you ‘notice’ that they say that’s ‘stupid’.

    I mean, our SJW’s are one thing but Chinese, Indian, and Arab are as equally nuts. There are just a lot more of them….

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 17:35:00 UTC

  • WHAT IQ AVERAGES DON”T TELL YOU IQ averages really tell you the various sizes of

    WHAT IQ AVERAGES DON”T TELL YOU

    IQ averages really tell you the various sizes of the under, labor, and working class, and lower middle, middle and upper middle class.

    You really can’t say ‘x people are stupid’. You have to only say: damn, in that population, there are wayyy more stupid people than smart people.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 17:33:00 UTC

  • What happens when we are no longer functioning in the context of the fantasies o

    What happens when we are no longer functioning in the context of the fantasies of literature and history, and are face-front with the science that says: “Yes, the source of evil in the ancient and modern worlds, and the causes of our dark ages, is the invention of lying by suggestion and it has caused more death, suffering, poverty, ignorance, and degeneracy than all the plaques of history combined.?”

    What happens when we can no longer deny the fact that Abrahamism evolved to be worse with each generation, and islam – the third generation – was worse than all other ills of mankind combined?

    We can’t deny it any longer.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 15:44:00 UTC

  • (watching. i’m struck. these people. they look like prey.)

    (watching. i’m struck. these people. they look like prey.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-16 14:17:00 UTC