Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • MALE AND FEMALE LIFETIME STRATEGIES Except for the upper 1/2 of 1% of men, women

    MALE AND FEMALE LIFETIME STRATEGIES

    Except for the upper 1/2 of 1% of men, women are far more scarce for men than men are for women.

    And 1/3 of men have little or little or no market value at all.

    More than half of women are not insignificantly crazy.

    For men, children and women are an investment, and without them your life will be shorter and the later parts of it far less pleasant if not sad. If you have to choose, have as many children as you can pay attention to. You can trade women. But you cannot trade children.

    It is easier for women to find work in the easy and clean jobs, and easier for men to find work in the hard and dirty jobs.

    It is easier for women to integrate into new social groups as they get older.

    It is far harder for men to integrate into social groups as they get older.

    It is hard for women to ‘get things done’ as they get older.

    It is hard for men to take care of themselves as they get older.

    We are desperately short of men’s monasteries, secular monasteries, and regimental barracks (monasteries) than we need to be. And those changes can only occur if we are able to employ right of disassociation (requiring very specific kinship ties for membership)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:58:00 UTC

  • THE LOGIC OF THE SH-T TEST: CONTINUOUS COMPOSURE AND USEFULNESS –“Women shit te

    THE LOGIC OF THE SH-T TEST: CONTINUOUS COMPOSURE AND USEFULNESS

    –“Women shit test to make sure they are holding themselves in high enough company – company that can take care of her in case sh-t hits the fan, or to sort out the snakes. The genetic urge to constantly test your companion for composure can be very beneficial but it can also unravel unfit mates. As long as the man can maintain his frame of mind during a shit test he will pass, but if he can spread his composure to the woman he can “win”. The shit tests never stop and as you spread your composure to the woman through constant interaction her feminine energies will incorporate your composure and move to a higher level, I believe this is the case with a guy who “saves a girl” while not investing in himself enough ultimately being passed and outliving his usefulness. To maintain your attractiveness to your mate you must always be useful and always maintain a higher level of composure than your mate, through self discipline and self improvement of the mind and body. Shit tests can destroy you but if you understand them they can lead you to being the best man possible.”— George Carvlin

    I say this a bit differently as: our job is to make women feel safe in whatever way they need to feel safe. Unfortunately we have not been raised to make women feel safe and women have been raised to pretend they do not need to feel safe. So women are crazy and men are frustrated.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 19:45:00 UTC

  • “For a woman men are commodities. Only children are specialties.”—Francesco Pr

    —“For a woman men are commodities. Only children are specialties.”—Francesco Principi

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 13:06:00 UTC

  • THE ‘SH-T TEST’ theory of female behavior has legs. In fact, it might be the mos

    THE ‘SH-T TEST’ theory of female behavior has legs. In fact, it might be the most important theory of female behavior – ever.

    Seriously. As a search algorithm for a life form with a valuable commodity (vagina), it’s fantastic. Women Sh-t Test each other too you know. Constantly. And that’s why women have so few close friends compared to men.

    It’s just cheaper to Sh-t Test than any other available strategy.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-31 08:30:00 UTC

  • WHICH IS MOST POWERFUL: A GUN, A PENCIL, OR A STACK OF MONEY: It’s not a questio

    WHICH IS MOST POWERFUL: A GUN, A PENCIL, OR A STACK OF MONEY:

    It’s not a question of the power of the instrument but the talent that is required to use the instrument to achieve change at scale.

    ARMS: You can assassinate a key political figure, or start a word war, vs rob a liquor store or kill someone you are in a dispute with.

    WRITING: You can write the an inquiry into human understanding, critique of pure reason, paine’s common sense, the communist manifesto, or the works of lenin and trotsky – or you can write profusely and achieve nothing because no one reads it, because it has no *solution* value to them.

    MONEY: You can use money to destroy a country (financialism), fund a revolution (soros), and initiate warfare (buy votes to obtain political ends), or you can achieve nothing because what you are attempting to do *is not of interest to people*.

    The question is not the tool but the talent to use it.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-30 07:49:00 UTC

  • You know. There are some people with attention deficit disorder, and then there

    You know. There are some people with attention deficit disorder, and then there are some people with attention disability disorder. lol

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-27 16:39:00 UTC

  • I know Montaigne said it first, but I have found it to be true: that others gene

    I know Montaigne said it first, but I have found it to be true: that others generally think ill of us for things we did not do, did not intend, or had no incentives to do, or had completely different intentions and incentives. Yet those things we do that are intentionally unethical, immoral, and evil so much more frequently go unnoticed. People criticize what they see. They too often imagine ill behind what they see. Because they project upon others their own intuitions. All the while, blind to the incentives, and the consequences they don’t see.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-27 10:40:00 UTC

  • CRITICIZING MATERIALISM: FOR GOOD OR BAD REASONS? Well, you know, criticizing ma

    CRITICIZING MATERIALISM: FOR GOOD OR BAD REASONS?

    Well, you know, criticizing materialism as a substitute for the familial (reproduction) is logical. For the social, likely. For the religious and supernatural, nonsense. In fact, there is a high correlation between social rejection and religiosity for precisely those reasons. So when I hear people want ‘traditionalism’ hear they are socially incompetent and want a way to enter the dream state in public – the ultimate selfishness – spiritual masturbation. They are generating demand for a bad. When I hear people talk about loneliness, loss of the civil society, or being unfulfilled by material goods, I hear that they long for social participation, or the safety of family and clan, then they are demonstrating demand for a ‘good’. Participatory sport, participatory debate, participatory theatre, participatory sacrifice (donation to the commons) and personal commune with the gods, with emphasis on ritual assist in social trust and bonding.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-27 07:27:00 UTC

  • I know what drives the people to the dream state end of the spectrum versus the

    I know what drives the people to the dream state end of the spectrum versus the real state end of the spectrum. And it’s not complimentary.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-27 00:35:00 UTC

  • IT’S JUST ‘CAUSE YOU’RE WELL INTENTIONED BUT IGNORANT (REALLY) I’m saying that (

    IT’S JUST ‘CAUSE YOU’RE WELL INTENTIONED BUT IGNORANT (REALLY)

    I’m saying that (a) you don’t need to be taught morality because it’s both in your genes and necessary for survival in existential reality – we have tested it. It’s just true. (b) What you have been taught as a means of obtaining mindfulness can be obtained by many ways, and of those ways you have been taught is one of the worst of them (c) one of the means of teaching such is by conflating the obvious and necessary and unavoidable with superstitious falsehood.

    Every religion teaches the same thing using different arguments. These arguments JUSTIFY what exists, by providing a FALSE explanation of what exists in lieu of UNDERSTANDING why it exists.

    They do not CAUSE it to exist whatsoever.

    What they CAN do, whether by Law (understanding of precise measurements), education (knowledge of general rules), or religion (empathy by storytelling) is increase the precision of those measures, rules, and analogies.

    The fact that you have been trained in one religion not ten, and that you understand one moral code not twenty, and understand one legal code, not one hundred, just means you’re ignorant of the alternatives.

    That’s all it means. That’s what the evidence shows.

    The value of christianity in the west was that it mirrored existing low clannishness because of higher pedomorphism (science) and higher verbal acumen (science) and reduction of friction from the lower clasesses (science). The germanicization of christianity resulted in individual protestantism and action vs replacing community catholicism and submission. And even today protestant countries are far higher trust and less backward and corrupt than catholic countries.

    The value of anglo legalism (viking-thinking, anglo-saxon thinking) is that it’s simply personally, commercially, and civically beneficial to demonstrate high trust to others.

    The problem with european and american atheism is that it’s NOT atheism but faith in 19th and 20th century pseudoscience. And the evidence is clear that the church (pseudorationalism, supernaturalism) cannot defeat pseudoscience.

    So if we are going to defeat pseudoscience, the only method of doing so is truth.

    Sorry. That’s all there is.

    Either you are defeated by the marxist/postmodernist/democratic secular socialist / universal human rights pseudosciences that were invented (psudo-scientific abrahamism) to exterminate the aristocratic civilizations, or you will use truth (law, eduction, science) to defeat them AND the supernaturalism of ancient abrahamism (judaism, christianity, islamism)

    You cannot use a more primitive form of lie (religion) to defeat a more advanced form of lie (pseudoscience).

    THat’s what the evidence is.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-26 10:31:00 UTC