Never treat disapproval, rejection, shaming, ridicule, and rallying by the left’s effeminacy as anything other than the barking of purse-dogs,with just as much agency behind it.Adults make empirical arguments.If you make a sentimental argument it just means you’re a child. #trump
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-12 22:21:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/951942173938896897
You want the scariest economic question of all? What is the cumulative cost per year of the loss of one point of median IQ? What is the aggregate return on increasing median IQ by one point per year? What is the single highest return a polity can invest in? #Trump
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-12 15:45:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/951842560602968065
The temporal and consumptive, vs intertemporal and cumulative, is the causal difference in gender, class, tribal, cultural, national group reproductive and evolutionary strategies, and is the source of our ‘moral’ perceptions, and political expressions of those perceptions.
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-12 13:29:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/951808456004169728
Reply addressees: @RyanRoach5 @CurtisHouck @RichLowry @joanwalsh
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/951718518776410112
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/951718518776410112
If you just look at the sequence:
1 – Female reproductive strategy
2 – Jewish group evolutionary strategy
3 – Christian group evolutionary strategy
4 – Muslim group evolutionary strategy
5 – Marxist-Postmodernist group evolutionary strategy
All we are talking about is increasing levels of coercion for the purpose of theft, as scale increases.
I mean. Humans are very simple things.
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-05 12:43:00 UTC
OUTLINE
(If I am lucky this will help a great deal)
– Acquisitiveness (humans acquire, and must, and decidability is provided by acquisition – its just determining what they want to acquire.)
– Signaling (reproductive, productive. and social fitness.)
– Conspicuous Consumption (Signalling)
– Virtue Signaling (truthful, vs fraudulent)
– Three possible means of persuasion(violence, payment, shaming)
– Scale: Shaming > Gossip > Rallying > Publishing > Media >
Propaganda > Literature > Pseudo-philosophy/Pseudo-rationalism > Pseudoscience > Mysticism(magic) > Outright Lying.
– Incremental suppression (killing > violence > theft > fraud > parasitism > free riding > privatization/socialization > conspiracy > institutionalism > propagandism(fictionalism) > conversion > over-reproduction > immigration > invasion > war > ethnocide > genocide )
– use of natural law of tort(Reciprocity) to require warranty of truthful speech in the commons just as we require warranty of products and services, and the statements about those products and services. Why have we not required truth in public speech other than until now, we were not sure how to create a test of truthfulness of speech?
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-05 11:45:00 UTC