Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Research in the field of psychology over the past fifteen years at least, has la

    Research in the field of psychology over the past fifteen years at least, has largely evolved into the study of ERROR. (cognitive bias), and been subsumed by cognitive science. Eras: religious analogy, moral analogy, psychological analogy. They’re all fictionalisms.Learn Science.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 12:20:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953240575800725505

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @nntaleb

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953237918470017026

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953237918470017026

  • My friend Liam informs me that technically speaking the only available diagnosis

    My friend Liam informs me that technically speaking the only available diagnosis is Psychopath, and that its only a vernacular usage to refer to those people who demonstrate their psychopathy in social circumstances as sociopaths, and those who demonstrate their psychopathy by violence. Technically speaking, the only existing diagnosis is psychopath. So technically speaking my ‘troll’ is a psychopath, not a sociopath. He just externalizes his psychopathy at present in social circumstances, despite his burning desire to externalize it as physical violence.

    I actually hate hurting and offending people. I just hate abrahamic deceptions as means of bringing about another dark age more…..

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 12:18:00 UTC

  • My friend Liam informs me that technically speaking the only available diagnosis

    My friend Liam informs me that technically speaking the only available diagnosis is Psychopath, and that its only a vernacular usage to refer to those people who demonstrate their psychopathy in social circumstances as sociopaths, and those who demonstrate their psychopathy by violence. Technically speaking, the only existing diagnosis is psychopath. So technically speaking my ‘troll’ is a psychopath, not a sociopath. He just externalizes his psychopathy at present in social circumstances, despite his burning desire to externalize it as physical violence. I actually hate hurting and offending people. I just hate abrahamic deceptions as means of bringing about another dark age more…..

  • My friend Liam informs me that technically speaking the only available diagnosis

    My friend Liam informs me that technically speaking the only available diagnosis is Psychopath, and that its only a vernacular usage to refer to those people who demonstrate their psychopathy in social circumstances as sociopaths, and those who demonstrate their psychopathy by violence. Technically speaking, the only existing diagnosis is psychopath. So technically speaking my ‘troll’ is a psychopath, not a sociopath. He just externalizes his psychopathy at present in social circumstances, despite his burning desire to externalize it as physical violence. I actually hate hurting and offending people. I just hate abrahamic deceptions as means of bringing about another dark age more…..

  • So any and all use of psychology is actually just a form of pseudoscientific rid

    So any and all use of psychology is actually just a form of pseudoscientific ridicule, gossip, shaming, and rallying. It’s all lies without any empirical basis. All human behavior can be explained TRUTHFULLY and scientifically by subjective testing of incentives to acquire.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 12:08:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953237541788045313

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @nntaleb

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953235946434187264

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953235946434187264

  • it’s still pseudoscience for the purpose of deception. Instead, map out incentiv

    it’s still pseudoscience for the purpose of deception. Instead, map out incentives to seek to understand others, rather than imposing your incentives in order to shame others. All humans seek to acquire the full spectrum of material, relational, social, and intellectual capital.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 12:04:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953236490670272512

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @nntaleb

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953235946434187264

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953235946434187264

  • OMFG. No. Psychologizing makes use of pseudoscience to deceive, rally and shame.

    OMFG. No. Psychologizing makes use of pseudoscience to deceive, rally and shame. Blocking pseudoscientists is just … scientific. ( Although, given that the majority of BS degrees are in such pseudosciences, that’s a lot of blocking.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 11:56:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953234432596508672

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @nntaleb

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953227531578200065

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953227531578200065

  • Simple version: Retention of juvenile traits and slowing of reproductive depth a

    Simple version: Retention of juvenile traits and slowing of reproductive depth and rates, is reproductively desirable. Symmetry and preservation of ideal ratios is reproductively desirable. Races, subraces, and tribes evolved in different environments where different rates and depths of maturity were beneficial, and some where they were harmful. All races, subraces, and tribes contain members who retain juvenile traits, and who have the ideal proportions. Some races and subraces and tribes contain a larger percentage of those with juvenile traits and ideal proportions. In most cases features correspond with genetic and social class. The size of the underclass determines the distribution of favorable traits. (Too many people at the bottom is harmful) East asians and western europeans were in the most favorable conditions to evolve such traits, and reduce the size of the underclasses. In other words: it’s not about how races look, it’s about the number of people in each race, subrace, or tribe who are less desirable. 😉

  • Simple version: Retention of juvenile traits and slowing of reproductive depth a

    Simple version: Retention of juvenile traits and slowing of reproductive depth and rates, is reproductively desirable. Symmetry and preservation of ideal ratios is reproductively desirable. Races, subraces, and tribes evolved in different environments where different rates and depths of maturity were beneficial, and some where they were harmful. All races, subraces, and tribes contain members who retain juvenile traits, and who have the ideal proportions. Some races and subraces and tribes contain a larger percentage of those with juvenile traits and ideal proportions. In most cases features correspond with genetic and social class. The size of the underclass determines the distribution of favorable traits. (Too many people at the bottom is harmful) East asians and western europeans were in the most favorable conditions to evolve such traits, and reduce the size of the underclasses. In other words: it’s not about how races look, it’s about the number of people in each race, subrace, or tribe who are less desirable. 😉

  • Simple version: Retention of juvenile traits and slowing of reproductive depth a

    Simple version:

    Retention of juvenile traits and slowing of reproductive depth and rates, is reproductively desirable.

    Symmetry and preservation of ideal ratios is reproductively desirable.

    Races, subraces, and tribes evolved in different environments where different rates and depths of maturity were beneficial, and some where they were harmful.

    All races, subraces, and tribes contain members who retain juvenile traits, and who have the ideal proportions.

    Some races and subraces and tribes contain a larger percentage of those with juvenile traits and ideal proportions.

    In most cases features correspond with genetic and social class.

    The size of the underclass determines the distribution of favorable traits. (Too many people at the bottom is harmful)

    East asians and western europeans were in the most favorable conditions to evolve such traits, and reduce the size of the underclasses.

    In other words: it’s not about how races look, it’s about the number of people in each race, subrace, or tribe who are less desirable. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-15 19:19:00 UTC