Inferiority and superiority are simply a measurement of agency. They’re purely empirical assessments. Either one possesses agency of the self, the group, the environment, the universe, or one does not. The inferior cannot compete. The superior can. This competition whether internal interpersonal political environmental or physical is the only empirical test of superiority and inferiority. Evolution and entropy never stop. They are ceaseless. The superior evolves, adapts, increases its agency, and the inferior does not, and dies, and evolution and entropy continue their battle. This is not an opinion or a value statement, it is a description of every single process in the universe.
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
@ergo_praxis The feminine group social strategy consists of disapproval, shaming
@ergo_praxis
The feminine group social strategy consists of disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying.But this only serves if your one has value and affection (ahem) to trade. Males make arguments lest they provoke repercussions. Both to disrupt the dominance hierarchy.(Owned) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 04:37:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973417728148168704
-
The feminine group social strategy (from weakness) consists of disapproval, sham
The feminine group social strategy (from weakness) consists of disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying.But this only serves if your one has value and affection (ahem) to trade. Males make arguments lest they provoke repercussions. Both seek to disrupt the dominance hierarchy. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 04:34:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973417081684324352
Reply addressees: @CHMPBEGFORSDLA
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973399968693260288
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973399968693260288
-
Feminine disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, and gossip merely provide the
Feminine disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, and gossip merely provide the aristocracy with opportunity to counter. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 04:34:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973417057441271809
Reply addressees: @CHMPBEGFORSDLA
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973399968693260288
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973399968693260288
-
21 – Or, what we call the Female group evolutionary strategy of “Gossip” – the r
21 – Or, what we call the Female group evolutionary strategy of “Gossip” – the rallying of the many weak to undermine the strong, so that she controls her reproduction, and her offspring have opportunity regardless of their merit.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-12 12:40:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973176784354193409
Reply addressees: @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/972432694675058688
IN REPLY TO:
@nathancofnas
My analysis of Kevin MacDonald’s pseudoscience: https://t.co/eRfp6B8g0e
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/972432694675058688
-
11 – It is rather trivial, (possessed of some understanding of reproductive stra
11 – It is rather trivial, (possessed of some understanding of reproductive strategies, economics, archetypes and the limited set of narrative acs) to articulate any group’s evolutionary strategy, and using demographic measurements explain its utility to its distribution.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-12 12:12:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973169825756471298
Reply addressees: @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/972432694675058688
IN REPLY TO:
@nathancofnas
My analysis of Kevin MacDonald’s pseudoscience: https://t.co/eRfp6B8g0e
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/972432694675058688
-
10 – for the simple reason that it is status signals in support of that group ev
10 – for the simple reason that it is status signals in support of that group evolutionary strategy that each group member seeks to persist – particularly among intellectuals (who have nothing else to offer) vs military and commercial who rely far less on such narratives.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-12 12:09:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973169180320108544
Reply addressees: @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/972432694675058688
IN REPLY TO:
@nathancofnas
My analysis of Kevin MacDonald’s pseudoscience: https://t.co/eRfp6B8g0e
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/972432694675058688
-
The majority of female judgment applies to children under the age of twelve, and
The majority of female judgment applies to children under the age of twelve, and possibly, if they develop slowly, the age of thirteen. Hence the tragic social consequences of (unmarried) female voting. -
The majority of female judgment applies to children under the age of twelve, and
The majority of female judgment applies to children under the age of twelve, and possibly, if they develop slowly, the age of thirteen.
Hence the tragic social consequences of (unmarried) female voting.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-11 13:18:00 UTC
-
The majority of female judgment applies to children under the age of twelve, and
The majority of female judgment applies to children under the age of twelve, and possibly, if they develop slowly, the age of thirteen. Hence the tragic social consequences of (unmarried) female voting.