Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • I’m saying if you graph testosterone by class, major tribe(hundreds), SubRace (3

    I’m saying if you graph testosterone by class, major tribe(hundreds), SubRace (30 or so) and Races (3-4), that pedomorphic selection and testosterone coincide and so do facial features, with dimorphism varying between groups. ie: east asians lowest, africans highest.

    The way to domesticate a human animal is no different from any other. Overtake its dominance hierarchy and cull impulsivity and aggression. This turns out to produce neotenic trait expression, prolongation of maturation, and general decline in testosterone (and many other things)

    It’s pretty obvious. Some of us had to mature quickly in high disease gradients and some of us could afford to mature more slowly and produce fewer offspring in colder climates. Add prohibition on cousin marriage, the meat grinder of agrarianism/manorialism and underclass shrinks

    It’s not so much that any group is superior to any other group so much as that some groups have been more successful at culling the underclasses. If you can get your median above 105 very good things start to happen. I assume in the future that number will continue to increase

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 13:59:00 UTC

  • I’m saying if you graph testosterone by class, major tribe(hundreds), SubRace (3

    I’m saying if you graph testosterone by class, major tribe(hundreds), SubRace (30 or so) and Races (3-4), that pedomorphic selection and testosterone coincide and so do facial features, with dimorphism varying between groups. ie: east asians lowest, africans highest. The way to domesticate a human animal is no different from any other. Overtake its dominance hierarchy and cull impulsivity and aggression. This turns out to produce neotenic trait expression, prolongation of maturation, and general decline in testosterone (and many other things) It’s pretty obvious. Some of us had to mature quickly in high disease gradients and some of us could afford to mature more slowly and produce fewer offspring in colder climates. Add prohibition on cousin marriage, the meat grinder of agrarianism/manorialism and underclass shrinks It’s not so much that any group is superior to any other group so much as that some groups have been more successful at culling the underclasses. If you can get your median above 105 very good things start to happen. I assume in the future that number will continue to increase

  • I’m saying if you graph testosterone by class, major tribe(hundreds), SubRace (3

    I’m saying if you graph testosterone by class, major tribe(hundreds), SubRace (30 or so) and Races (3-4), that pedomorphic selection and testosterone coincide and so do facial features, with dimorphism varying between groups. ie: east asians lowest, africans highest. The way to domesticate a human animal is no different from any other. Overtake its dominance hierarchy and cull impulsivity and aggression. This turns out to produce neotenic trait expression, prolongation of maturation, and general decline in testosterone (and many other things) It’s pretty obvious. Some of us had to mature quickly in high disease gradients and some of us could afford to mature more slowly and produce fewer offspring in colder climates. Add prohibition on cousin marriage, the meat grinder of agrarianism/manorialism and underclass shrinks It’s not so much that any group is superior to any other group so much as that some groups have been more successful at culling the underclasses. If you can get your median above 105 very good things start to happen. I assume in the future that number will continue to increase

  • Define ‘you’ “i”. There are a very finite number of properties of ‘you’ that dif

    Define ‘you’ “i”. There are a very finite number of properties of ‘you’ that differ from the properties of others. As far as I know, you can only consist of a physical body living (surviving) in time, a set of memories that when stimulated by inputs produce consequence (changes) unique in time and space, and a set of others’ memories of your body and your behavior; and lastly the legal ‘you’ which refers to the set of records, obligations, and liabilities others cannot transfer to their exclusive control. This is the full spectrum of ‘you’ that has any meaning.

  • Define ‘you’ “i”. There are a very finite number of properties of ‘you’ that dif

    Define ‘you’ “i”. There are a very finite number of properties of ‘you’ that differ from the properties of others.

    As far as I know, you can only consist of a physical body living (surviving) in time, a set of memories that when stimulated by inputs produce consequence (changes) unique in time and space, and a set of others’ memories of your body and your behavior; and lastly the legal ‘you’ which refers to the set of records, obligations, and liabilities others cannot transfer to their exclusive control. This is the full spectrum of ‘you’ that has any meaning.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 13:39:00 UTC

  • Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evide

    Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evidence to me that your philosophy and Peterson’s dovetail beautifully, I wish that you two could exchange ideas. Interviewer: “I mentioned earlier that this country follows a lot of the US trends, good and bad, we are a little bit behind”. Peterson: “Like Canada” Interviewer: “What do we need to be alert to? What do we need to be aware of? What do we need to avoid?” Peterson: “We need to… we need to be alert to the benefits of the societies that we now inhabit. We need to be grateful for their existence and know very carefully the unlikelihood of their continued success. Now, I don’t understand how we managed it. In the West we have societies where the default assumption between human beings is trust. I do not understand how we managed that… because there’s so many ways that you can be betrayed by someone especially if you don’t know them. How do you set up a society where the typical interaction between strangers is straight? How many societies in the world are like that? Like, 30? 40? Something like that. How did that ever happen? We don’t know and it’s an ongoing miracle and we should do everything we can not to disrupt it because the alternative to that generous trust, that courageous trust, which is unbelievably productive, is rule by thug, and that’s the rule of most of the world.” Interviewer: “So do you have optimism or not for the future?” Peterson: “I think that we’re in a time of extreme chaos. Things could go unbelievably well if we’re careful. There’s so many good things going on in the world right now” … “God only knows what we could accomplish if we got our act together in the next twenty years. The sky is the limit. So… BUT we’re playing very foolish games in the West, and we could bring the house down around us. So, we’ll see.” https://youtu.be/hcDKNNvUR4I?t=13m39s Eric Danelaw

  • Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evide

    Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evidence to me that your philosophy and Peterson’s dovetail beautifully, I wish that you two could exchange ideas. Interviewer: “I mentioned earlier that this country follows a lot of the US trends, good and bad, we are a little bit behind”. Peterson: “Like Canada” Interviewer: “What do we need to be alert to? What do we need to be aware of? What do we need to avoid?” Peterson: “We need to… we need to be alert to the benefits of the societies that we now inhabit. We need to be grateful for their existence and know very carefully the unlikelihood of their continued success. Now, I don’t understand how we managed it. In the West we have societies where the default assumption between human beings is trust. I do not understand how we managed that… because there’s so many ways that you can be betrayed by someone especially if you don’t know them. How do you set up a society where the typical interaction between strangers is straight? How many societies in the world are like that? Like, 30? 40? Something like that. How did that ever happen? We don’t know and it’s an ongoing miracle and we should do everything we can not to disrupt it because the alternative to that generous trust, that courageous trust, which is unbelievably productive, is rule by thug, and that’s the rule of most of the world.” Interviewer: “So do you have optimism or not for the future?” Peterson: “I think that we’re in a time of extreme chaos. Things could go unbelievably well if we’re careful. There’s so many good things going on in the world right now” … “God only knows what we could accomplish if we got our act together in the next twenty years. The sky is the limit. So… BUT we’re playing very foolish games in the West, and we could bring the house down around us. So, we’ll see.” https://youtu.be/hcDKNNvUR4I?t=13m39s Eric Danelaw

  • Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evide

    Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evidence to me that your philosophy and Peterson’s dovetail beautifully, I wish that you two could exchange ideas.

    Interviewer: “I mentioned earlier that this country follows a lot of the US trends, good and bad, we are a little bit behind”.

    Peterson: “Like Canada”

    Interviewer: “What do we need to be alert to? What do we need to be aware of? What do we need to avoid?”

    Peterson: “We need to… we need to be alert to the benefits of the societies that we now inhabit. We need to be grateful for their existence and know very carefully the unlikelihood of their continued success. Now, I don’t understand how we managed it. In the West we have societies where the default assumption between human beings is trust. I do not understand how we managed that… because there’s so many ways that you can be betrayed by someone especially if you don’t know them. How do you set up a society where the typical interaction between strangers is straight? How many societies in the world are like that? Like, 30? 40? Something like that. How did that ever happen? We don’t know and it’s an ongoing miracle and we should do everything we can not to disrupt it because the alternative to that generous trust, that courageous trust, which is unbelievably productive, is rule by thug, and that’s the rule of most of the world.”

    Interviewer: “So do you have optimism or not for the future?”

    Peterson: “I think that we’re in a time of extreme chaos. Things could go unbelievably well if we’re careful. There’s so many good things going on in the world right now” … “God only knows what we could accomplish if we got our act together in the next twenty years. The sky is the limit. So… BUT we’re playing very foolish games in the West, and we could bring the house down around us. So, we’ll see.”

    https://youtu.be/hcDKNNvUR4I?t=13m39s

    Eric Danelaw

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 10:26:00 UTC

  • Superiority And Inferiority Are Purely Empirical Measures

    Inferiority and superiority are simply a measurement of agency. They’re purely empirical assessments. Either one possesses agency of the self, the group, the environment, the universe, or one does not. The inferior cannot compete. The superior can. This competition whether internal interpersonal political environmental or physical is the only empirical test of superiority and inferiority. Evolution and entropy never stop. They are ceaseless. The superior evolves, adapts, increases its agency, and the inferior does not, and dies, and evolution and entropy continue their battle. This is not an opinion or a value statement, it is a description of every single process in the universe.

  • Superiority And Inferiority Are Purely Empirical Measures

    Inferiority and superiority are simply a measurement of agency. They’re purely empirical assessments. Either one possesses agency of the self, the group, the environment, the universe, or one does not. The inferior cannot compete. The superior can. This competition whether internal interpersonal political environmental or physical is the only empirical test of superiority and inferiority. Evolution and entropy never stop. They are ceaseless. The superior evolves, adapts, increases its agency, and the inferior does not, and dies, and evolution and entropy continue their battle. This is not an opinion or a value statement, it is a description of every single process in the universe.