The upper classes make good families because they propagate good genes. The lower classes make bad families because they propagate bad genes. It’s not surprising why the upper classes would form packs and the underclasses want to join a herd: bad genes seek safety in numbers. Good genes seek safety in competition.
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
Don’t and We Can’t Give a Whit, What Those Lacking Agency Desire. They’re Just Pets.
The suppression of local rents by the empire and the increases in trade from the north sea to india made choices available to the underclasses in the past, just as the industrial revolution made choices available to the underclasses in modernity. And so you’re saying that because it is far harder to train those unwashed filthy, ignorant, and rather stupid masses in rational thought, the common law of reciprocity, and stoic virtues, and heroic myths, that we should allow the spread of marxist, socialist, postmodern, pseudoscientific, supernatural, and authoritarian falsehoods and allow another abrahamic dark age ‘because the self same uplifted underclasses cannot bear the reality of their lower sexual, social, economic, and political market value, despite their newfound ability to experience, and consume, because of their betters. So yes, there was an abrahamic dark age. No it does not matter what semi-domesticated animals feel, want, desire, when they can be trained to be at least far better domesticated animals with a bit of cost and effort. We lost over a THOUSAND YEARS, we lost multiple great civilizations, multiple lines of intellectual thought, because of the jewish conversion of roman deflationary language (idealism) into moral sophisms (that you do not know you are yourself repeating at this very moment). The christian destruction of knowledge, the arab destruction of knowledge and the failure of jews with the greatest ability and greatest literacy to do NOTHING AT ALL GOOD and everything possible bad to mankind before we forced aristotelianism upon them in exchange for their freedom – no longer worrying that they would cause prior catastrophes. So I do understand history. I just don’t make EXCUSES for the familiar, the weak, who, out of twisting my compassion would again put us into ignorance and deceit. Why is it a good, to tolerate those subhumans lacking the agency to face existential reality? It’s demonstrably not. It’s just more rewarding to rule them, and profit from doing so than it is to outright kill them off. Or at least, it was until recently. Now it looks like the opposite is true.
-
Don’t and We Can’t Give a Whit, What Those Lacking Agency Desire. They’re Just Pets.
The suppression of local rents by the empire and the increases in trade from the north sea to india made choices available to the underclasses in the past, just as the industrial revolution made choices available to the underclasses in modernity. And so you’re saying that because it is far harder to train those unwashed filthy, ignorant, and rather stupid masses in rational thought, the common law of reciprocity, and stoic virtues, and heroic myths, that we should allow the spread of marxist, socialist, postmodern, pseudoscientific, supernatural, and authoritarian falsehoods and allow another abrahamic dark age ‘because the self same uplifted underclasses cannot bear the reality of their lower sexual, social, economic, and political market value, despite their newfound ability to experience, and consume, because of their betters. So yes, there was an abrahamic dark age. No it does not matter what semi-domesticated animals feel, want, desire, when they can be trained to be at least far better domesticated animals with a bit of cost and effort. We lost over a THOUSAND YEARS, we lost multiple great civilizations, multiple lines of intellectual thought, because of the jewish conversion of roman deflationary language (idealism) into moral sophisms (that you do not know you are yourself repeating at this very moment). The christian destruction of knowledge, the arab destruction of knowledge and the failure of jews with the greatest ability and greatest literacy to do NOTHING AT ALL GOOD and everything possible bad to mankind before we forced aristotelianism upon them in exchange for their freedom – no longer worrying that they would cause prior catastrophes. So I do understand history. I just don’t make EXCUSES for the familiar, the weak, who, out of twisting my compassion would again put us into ignorance and deceit. Why is it a good, to tolerate those subhumans lacking the agency to face existential reality? It’s demonstrably not. It’s just more rewarding to rule them, and profit from doing so than it is to outright kill them off. Or at least, it was until recently. Now it looks like the opposite is true.
-
The high Russian-American IQ is precisely what you’d think because of who can af
The high Russian-American IQ is precisely what you’d think because of who can afford to get here.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 12:07:00 UTC
-
The upper classes make good families because they propagate good genes. The lowe
The upper classes make good families because they propagate good genes. The lower classes make bad families because they propagate bad genes. It’s not surprising why the upper classes would form packs and the underclasses want to join a herd: bad genes seek safety in numbers. Good genes seek safety in competition.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 21:50:00 UTC
-
People overestimate past genius, because after you’ve cross about what we consid
People overestimate past genius, because after you’ve cross about what we consider 130 today discoveries have a lot more to do with hard work and the person’s position history. Smart is pretty good but hard work … no substitute.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 19:13:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991757564462403585
-
On “Hitting Each Other” (Family)
Humans hit each other. I have had to teach every woman in every relationship not to hit me. Women conduct more domestic violence than men.Women are responsible for more verbal abuse than men. Women are responsible for more child abuse than men. The difference is that they aren’t dangerous – and men are. So, while I don’t do it, and I’m not cool about it, I’ve seen too many men take hits to the face from women that should have been slapped. I can definitely see slapping each other, which has been the method we used throughout history to say ‘ok, this is across the line’. And I’m not sure the world is better off without slapping each other once in a while. Why? Because slapping tends to de-escalate, and persisting in argument tends to escalate. Conflict is best settled early and clearly rather than continuously escalating through verbal and situational abuses.
COMMENTS by Ana Stowe (brilliant) —“Is hitting ok?”— Oh I see. This is a question from a man who likes women who bite and wants the thrill of taming her. It’s the same selfish line of reasoning as a woman who dates the dregs of society thinking she can “fix” him. I say “selfish” because neither thinks of the children. Have you ever even been around domestic violence? Gotten a frantic phone call from a younger sibling who’s scared because they saw dad hit mom through a crack in the bedroom door? Men who hit women have an awful effect on the children. And your wife, your children, and everyone who knew you will breathe a sigh of relief and spit on your grave when you’re dead. Stop indulging in film noire fantasies and get a woman who’s going to work with you for the wellbeing of your children
-
On “Hitting Each Other” (Family)
Humans hit each other. I have had to teach every woman in every relationship not to hit me. Women conduct more domestic violence than men.Women are responsible for more verbal abuse than men. Women are responsible for more child abuse than men. The difference is that they aren’t dangerous – and men are. So, while I don’t do it, and I’m not cool about it, I’ve seen too many men take hits to the face from women that should have been slapped. I can definitely see slapping each other, which has been the method we used throughout history to say ‘ok, this is across the line’. And I’m not sure the world is better off without slapping each other once in a while. Why? Because slapping tends to de-escalate, and persisting in argument tends to escalate. Conflict is best settled early and clearly rather than continuously escalating through verbal and situational abuses.
COMMENTS by Ana Stowe (brilliant) —“Is hitting ok?”— Oh I see. This is a question from a man who likes women who bite and wants the thrill of taming her. It’s the same selfish line of reasoning as a woman who dates the dregs of society thinking she can “fix” him. I say “selfish” because neither thinks of the children. Have you ever even been around domestic violence? Gotten a frantic phone call from a younger sibling who’s scared because they saw dad hit mom through a crack in the bedroom door? Men who hit women have an awful effect on the children. And your wife, your children, and everyone who knew you will breathe a sigh of relief and spit on your grave when you’re dead. Stop indulging in film noire fantasies and get a woman who’s going to work with you for the wellbeing of your children
-
RT @SteveStuWill: Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics “The disco
RT @SteveStuWill: Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7a6b/ad93d88b0158d449881e56749d5443b3ff80.pdf
“The discovery of such big and often counter…
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 11:28:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991640602243751936
-
“Where do you draw the line? Which are animals of pure determinism and which a m
—“Where do you draw the line? Which are animals of pure determinism and which a men of will?”—Colin Everett
Truthful speech.
See?
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-02 11:22:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/991638958458236929