Women fear to alter the status quo when it creates risk, men do not since it creates opportunity. This is why women perpetuate virtue signals like they do fashion signals or hen-pecking in female groups. It never ends. There is no optimum condition. Women voted to alter the status quo as a virtue, fashion, pecking cycle. It’s endless (Suicidal, obsessive, precognitive). Children and men are costly, so if they can marry the state and invite underclass opponents, and end marriage demands, they will do so (and have demonstrated it everywhere). So they have and do alter the status quo, they will not vote and do not act or vote to produce scarcity even when scarcity of opportunity is the optimum intertemporal investment.
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
Dunning Kruger Greatest in Ethics, Morality, and Politics
One of the many benefits of technical discourse is that idiots watch but don’t participate. The Dunning Kruger effect in intuitionistic matters is logarithmically greater than technical matters because intuition requires no calculation, and calculation tends to falsify intuition. Meaning idiots presume that their political opinions are somehow more legitimate than their economic, scientific, and mathematical opinions.
-
Dunning Kruger Greatest in Ethics, Morality, and Politics
One of the many benefits of technical discourse is that idiots watch but don’t participate. The Dunning Kruger effect in intuitionistic matters is logarithmically greater than technical matters because intuition requires no calculation, and calculation tends to falsify intuition. Meaning idiots presume that their political opinions are somehow more legitimate than their economic, scientific, and mathematical opinions.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. women fear to alter the status quo when it cr
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
women fear to alter the status quo when it creates risk, men do not since it creates opportunity. This is why women perpetuate virtue signals like they do fashion signals or hen-pecking in female groups. It never ends. There is no optimum condition.
Women voted to alter the status quo as a virtue, fashion, pecking cycle. It’s endless (Suicidal, obsessive, precognitive).
Children and men are costly, so if they can marry the state and invite underclass opponents, and end marriage demands, they will do so (and have demonstrated it everywhere).
SO they have and do alter the status quo, they wll not vote and do not act or vote to produce scarcity even when scarcity of opportunity is the optimum intertemporal investment.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 19:03:53 UTC
-
DUNNING KRUGER GREATEST IN ETHICS, MORALITY, AND POLITICS One of the many benefi
DUNNING KRUGER GREATEST IN ETHICS, MORALITY, AND POLITICS
One of the many benefits of technical discourse is that idiots watch but don’t participate.
The Dunning Kruger effect in intuitionistic matters is logarithmically greater than technical matters because intuition requires no calculation, and calculation tends to falsify intuition.
Meaning idiots presume that their political opinions are somehow more legitimate than their economic, scientific, and mathematical opinions.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 18:54:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“Why should I be barred from contributing
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
—“Why should I be barred from contributing to the growth of another who would in turn contribute to my own growth?”— Bennard Ebanks
When doing so imposes costs upon others by externality, who tolerate your presence only under the condition that you do not do so.
Groups differ in the degree of suppression of externalization of costs. High trust high performance, homogenous polities are intolerant – and because they are, they have the choice. Low trust, heterogeneous, low performing are tolerant. Because they have no other choice.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 16:07:19 UTC
-
women fear to alter the status quo when it creates risk, men do not since it cre
women fear to alter the status quo when it creates risk, men do not since it creates opportunity. This is why women perpetuate virtue signals like they do fashion signals or hen-pecking in female groups. It never ends. There is no optimum condition.
Women voted to alter the status quo as a virtue, fashion, pecking cycle. It’s endless (Suicidal, obsessive, precognitive).
Children and men are costly, so if they can marry the state and invite underclass opponents, and end marriage demands, they will do so (and have demonstrated it everywhere).
SO they have and do alter the status quo, they wll not vote and do not act or vote to produce scarcity even when scarcity of opportunity is the optimum intertemporal investment.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 15:03:00 UTC
-
How many of your ‘arguments’ are just excuses for doing nothing to alter the sta
How many of your ‘arguments’ are just excuses for doing nothing to alter the status quo? Adults don’t do that. Children and women do.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 12:42:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020650113876856832
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. How many of your ‘arguments’ are just excuses
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
How many of your ‘arguments’ are just excuses for doing nothing to alter the status quo? Adults don’t do that. Children and women do.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 12:41:54 UTC
-
How many of your ‘arguments’ are just excuses for doing nothing to alter the sta
How many of your ‘arguments’ are just excuses for doing nothing to alter the status quo? Adults don’t do that. Children and women do.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 08:41:00 UTC