Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • My grandmother, mother, me, my sister, daughter, and niece are so cognitively si

    My grandmother, mother, me, my sister, daughter, and niece are so cognitively similar, despite being cognitively rare, that we might as well be clones. One of the problems of living outside of the same ‘village’ or ‘neighborhood’ is that we don’t realize it, and have to struggle through discovery and understanding of our rare cognitive processes alone. And while it’s probably true that we are extreme examples, the fact that we no longer have large families in each generation, or large cohabiting families across generations, leads to alienation for far too many of us – even those that are not outliers. I see a lot of lost people primarily because they are unsocialized and infantilized, and lack intergenerational families that have mastered the talents within their genes.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 19:55:00 UTC

  • THE MALE DISINCENTIVE FOR SOCIAL PRESERVATION by Lance Bean “It’s ALL Different

    THE MALE DISINCENTIVE FOR SOCIAL PRESERVATION

    by Lance Bean

    “It’s ALL Different Now.”

    Relationship dynamics have completely changed. But without a MARKETING CAMPAIGN, repeatedly smashing it into people’s men’s faces, NOBODY is “getting it”. And as a consequence we see a anxious, spooked, flocking of everyone’s frames creating a chaos of confusion as we seek a restoration, when the problem is that we can’t.

    “IT’S ALL DIFFERENT NOW”: Men and women NEED each other less with every passing moment. That fact changes the family dynamic. Technology has freed us from interdependence.

    Marriage WAS the alternative to prostitution. Now prostitution is criminal and marriage is passé. It used to be both genders marry young and have several kids to work the farm. Families were an asset that provided lifetime discounts and insurance, allowed for the accumulation of capital, prevented parasitism on the property and efforts of others, and prevented male on male violence.

    Now, it’s extremely smart for the youngest women to have a single child by several different men of high income with established careers – preferably in marriages.

    Her incentives are to increase her income by being a baby maker but siphoning off of men – who lose marketability to other women, lose the ability to accumulate resources, and are doomed to poverty in old age.

    Under those conditions, men have become indentured slaves until the child is a mid 20’s adult – and wards of the state in old age. Children in the past were considered adults at 14 or 15 and they had to work and some married. Today they infantilized by a female dominated educational system, the aggressive suppression of masculinity and male dominance play that is necessary for men to invest in family, society, and polity.

    To pretend that the natural order is a traditional conservative nuclear family is ridiculous: the natural order is prostitution.

    Prostitution was accepted as legitimate for thousands of years. ALL women were prostitutes.

    Men only “married” or sometimes took care of the women that had a kid by him through rape most likely.

    The men could organize, hunt, kill and rape.

    Now they are tax slaves.

    What does this mean? It is no longer in men’s incentive to preserve a government and social order that reduces them to serfdom, isolation, old age loneliness, and poverty.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 19:19:00 UTC

  • THE DUNNING KRUGER EFFECT AND UPCOMING LIBERAL NARCOSIS

    THE DUNNING KRUGER EFFECT AND UPCOMING LIBERAL NARCOSIS

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXsLWIUUsIo

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 16:47:00 UTC

  • The Herd All Speaks the Same Language. the Packs Don’t.

    The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack. Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary. And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) – as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass. And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the left’s parasitism. So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes – and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight. So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all. The herd all speaks the same language. The packs don’t.

  • The Herd All Speaks the Same Language. the Packs Don’t.

    The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack. Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary. And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) – as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass. And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the left’s parasitism. So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes – and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight. So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all. The herd all speaks the same language. The packs don’t.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack.

    Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary.

    And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) – as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant

    But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass.

    And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the left’s parasitism.

    So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes – and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight.

    So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all.

    The herd all speaks the same language. The packs don’t.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-22 19:04:47 UTC

  • by James Lyons Sr. Many women want to play house. But when it comes down to it,

    by James Lyons Sr.

    Many women want to play house. But when it comes down to it, they are neither ready nor equipped to make a home, and even less so to be a mother. It took a lot of experience with slutty behavior for me to learn this.

    Likewise, many men are not ready to make a home and even less so to be a father.

    For both men and women, it is nothing other than an excuse to take advantage of the discounts from living in one residence on two incomes and lowering the cost of seeking mates, sex and entertainment.

    Neither Men nor Women are trying to create intergenerational insurance: families because we have removed the incentives to do so.

    Children are, if anything, pets.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-22 15:18:00 UTC

  • The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The

    The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack.

    Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary.

    And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) – as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant

    But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass.

    And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the left’s parasitism.

    So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes – and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight.

    So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all.

    The herd all speaks the same language. The packs don’t.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-22 15:04:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. DUNNING KRUGER GREATEST IN ETHICS, MORALITY,

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    DUNNING KRUGER GREATEST IN ETHICS, MORALITY, AND POLITICS

    One of the many benefits of technical discourse is that idiots watch but don’t participate.

    The Dunning Kruger effect in intuitionistic matters is logarithmically greater than technical matters because intuition requires no calculation, and calculation tends to falsify intuition.

    Meaning idiots presume that their political opinions are somehow more legitimate than their economic, scientific, and mathematical opinions.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 22:54:16 UTC

  • Women See Risk, and Men See Opportunity.

    Women fear to alter the status quo when it creates risk, men do not since it creates opportunity. This is why women perpetuate virtue signals like they do fashion signals or hen-pecking in female groups. It never ends. There is no optimum condition. Women voted to alter the status quo as a virtue, fashion, pecking cycle. It’s endless (Suicidal, obsessive, precognitive). Children and men are costly, so if they can marry the state and invite underclass opponents, and end marriage demands, they will do so (and have demonstrated it everywhere). So they have and do alter the status quo, they will not vote and do not act or vote to produce scarcity even when scarcity of opportunity is the optimum intertemporal investment.