Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • THE MARGIN OF ERROR IN RAISING BOYS IS SMALLER THAN GIRLS Lunch with two Sicilia

    THE MARGIN OF ERROR IN RAISING BOYS IS SMALLER THAN GIRLS

    Lunch with two Sicilians. Retired.Ex cop. I asked my favorite cop question: how old does a kid need to be before you can tell he’s going to be a criminal. Answer: “Seven”. I get the same answer from every career policeman. Why? ‘Cause it’s just true. If you haven’t got a boy ‘set’ by seven, maybe by four, you’ve failed. Boys are much easier than girls, but the margin for error boys is very small compared to girls.The world can tolerate cheap, nasty, and crazy girls. It cannot easily tolerate reckless, uncaring, and violent boys


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-18 12:33:00 UTC

  • “Men Are Lean, Mean, Problem Solving Machines”.

    Boys are easier to raise than girls. Really. But they are. Because we are SIMPLE. It seems to take until women have late teenage boys before they realize that MEN ARE SIMPLE. “Men Are Lean, Mean, Problem Solving Machines”.

  • “Men Are Lean, Mean, Problem Solving Machines”.

    Boys are easier to raise than girls. Really. But they are. Because we are SIMPLE. It seems to take until women have late teenage boys before they realize that MEN ARE SIMPLE. “Men Are Lean, Mean, Problem Solving Machines”.

  • “Why is the subject of cognitive deficit rarely mentioned as one of the contributing factors of poverty?”

    —“Why Is the subject of cognitive deficrt rarely mentioned as one of the contributing factors of poverty?” THE CORRECT ANSWER 1. First, because it violates the marxist and postmodern oppression narrative. People were not oppressed. The underclass was domesticated as were all other domesticated animals. The current social economic political and military differences between races and nations is determined entirely by the success at culling the underclasses under the harsh conditions of agrarian winters. 2. Second because the marxist-postmodernists that dominate education cannot accept it, because it would violate the oppression narrative. If the oppression narrative is undermined that means that the pursuit of power by the marxist postmodernists loses legitimacy. 3. Third because it is largely in-actionable other than via eugenics, and leads directly to justifying the eugenics narrative. 4. Fourth because it would justify either redistribution which would make the right furious OR eugenics which would make the left furious. 5. Fifth because the truth is unacceptable to the underclasses (and non- whites) and therefore the left’s political party (democrats) would lose their base – democracy forces falsehoods and prevents truths. Thanks, as always for the Ask To Answer. -cheers.

  • “Why is the subject of cognitive deficit rarely mentioned as one of the contributing factors of poverty?”

    —“Why Is the subject of cognitive deficrt rarely mentioned as one of the contributing factors of poverty?” THE CORRECT ANSWER 1. First, because it violates the marxist and postmodern oppression narrative. People were not oppressed. The underclass was domesticated as were all other domesticated animals. The current social economic political and military differences between races and nations is determined entirely by the success at culling the underclasses under the harsh conditions of agrarian winters. 2. Second because the marxist-postmodernists that dominate education cannot accept it, because it would violate the oppression narrative. If the oppression narrative is undermined that means that the pursuit of power by the marxist postmodernists loses legitimacy. 3. Third because it is largely in-actionable other than via eugenics, and leads directly to justifying the eugenics narrative. 4. Fourth because it would justify either redistribution which would make the right furious OR eugenics which would make the left furious. 5. Fifth because the truth is unacceptable to the underclasses (and non- whites) and therefore the left’s political party (democrats) would lose their base – democracy forces falsehoods and prevents truths. Thanks, as always for the Ask To Answer. -cheers.

  • It’s not complicated.

    Female Herd Equality -vs- Male Pack Reciprocity

  • It’s not complicated.

    Female Herd Equality -vs- Male Pack Reciprocity

  • Magical Thinking

    –“Magical thinking is the attribution of causal or synchronistic relationships between actions and events which seemingly cannot be justified by reason and observation. In religion, folk religion, and superstitious beliefs, the posited correlation is often between religious ritual, prayer, sacrifice, or the observance of a taboo, and an expected benefit or recompense.”– As you move east and south this seems to increases rapidly

  • Magical Thinking

    –“Magical thinking is the attribution of causal or synchronistic relationships between actions and events which seemingly cannot be justified by reason and observation. In religion, folk religion, and superstitious beliefs, the posited correlation is often between religious ritual, prayer, sacrifice, or the observance of a taboo, and an expected benefit or recompense.”– As you move east and south this seems to increases rapidly