–Or you can simply look at it as (((they))) are all cognitively female, and that (((they))) are just the most evolved version of “Sh– Tester” (females), and we need to correct both problems. Which is how I look at it.—CD —Again, let’s repeat: “Cosmopolitanism is genetic communism, just as socialism is private property communism, just as libertarianism is common property communism, just as neo-conservatism is national communism.”–CD —This is why segregation will be ineffective. The inertia of their religion dictates they permanently instigate class warfare explicitly, Egalitarianism/oppression narrative is simply the strategy but not the ideological impetus compelling them, which is power at any price. Segregation only kicks the can down the road. They must be ruled, and brutally—Joseph Smith
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
J-Bias: The Difference is Distributions
( http://helmuthnyborg.dk//srv/htdocs/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Publ_2009_The-Intellligence-Religiosity-Nexus.pdf ) There is no superior race, just superior distributions that make use of superior ideas. Thee jews, despite being the most literate people in the dark and middle ages (a darkness they contributed to) achieved precisely NOTHING. Every Jewish achievement was made by their nearly forcible indoctrination into aristotelianism, in exchange for integration. They managed to produce the most murderous ideas in ancient history (judaism, christianity, islam), and the most murderous ideas in modern history (marxism), and the pseudosciences and deceits of the modern world (boasianism, fruedianism, cantorian supernaturalism in mathematics, the frankfurt school, and nearly single handedly destroyed both the academy and rule of law. And have nearly destroyed our civilization thrrough the 1965 immigration act, and their continuing efforts at making the world safe for judaism, which roughly transates to turning the world into the levant. The ONLY thinker they have is Einstein and he is overplayed because everything other than the Frame was the product of Europeans – even E=MC^2. He did manage to explain why. But he is their only non-pseudoscentific thinker. There are plenty of minor players, and a masterful effort for nepotism in the awards process. But data is data is data. Europeans did everything worth doing in history and did it faster for the simple reason that we tell the truth, —- and on one else does. So no, I don’t play superiority games, I just look the data. It’s notable that Babbage and Turing were Brits, and the Logicians were frequently Jewish, and so was Chomsky’s grammatical take on Turing. Turns out the logics were a total waste of time – there is no closure. Turns out mathematical set theory (logic) was harmful. Turns out the Grammars have far more to do with Turing than Chomsky. Everything is easily explained by jewish pilpul, pseudoscience, pseudo-mathematics, and psuedo-logic, versus anglo testimony, science, mathematics, and computation.
-
J-Bias: The Difference is Distributions
( http://helmuthnyborg.dk//srv/htdocs/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Publ_2009_The-Intellligence-Religiosity-Nexus.pdf ) There is no superior race, just superior distributions that make use of superior ideas. Thee jews, despite being the most literate people in the dark and middle ages (a darkness they contributed to) achieved precisely NOTHING. Every Jewish achievement was made by their nearly forcible indoctrination into aristotelianism, in exchange for integration. They managed to produce the most murderous ideas in ancient history (judaism, christianity, islam), and the most murderous ideas in modern history (marxism), and the pseudosciences and deceits of the modern world (boasianism, fruedianism, cantorian supernaturalism in mathematics, the frankfurt school, and nearly single handedly destroyed both the academy and rule of law. And have nearly destroyed our civilization thrrough the 1965 immigration act, and their continuing efforts at making the world safe for judaism, which roughly transates to turning the world into the levant. The ONLY thinker they have is Einstein and he is overplayed because everything other than the Frame was the product of Europeans – even E=MC^2. He did manage to explain why. But he is their only non-pseudoscentific thinker. There are plenty of minor players, and a masterful effort for nepotism in the awards process. But data is data is data. Europeans did everything worth doing in history and did it faster for the simple reason that we tell the truth, —- and on one else does. So no, I don’t play superiority games, I just look the data. It’s notable that Babbage and Turing were Brits, and the Logicians were frequently Jewish, and so was Chomsky’s grammatical take on Turing. Turns out the logics were a total waste of time – there is no closure. Turns out mathematical set theory (logic) was harmful. Turns out the Grammars have far more to do with Turing than Chomsky. Everything is easily explained by jewish pilpul, pseudoscience, pseudo-mathematics, and psuedo-logic, versus anglo testimony, science, mathematics, and computation.
-
J-Bias, Anglicans vs Jews
The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is higher than the the jewish IQ: 112) The jewish distribution is WIDER (13.1 vs 11.1), with more at the bottom and more at the top. So they produce an extra 10% above 130, and it is 130 and 140’s that provide executive (130) and academic (140) competitive ability.
The size of the world jewish population is about 6.5m. World anglican population is about 85m. Jews pursue a narrower set of careers than Anglicans/Episcopalians. Jews practice more nepotism. And Jewish excellence, which is verbal, is in demand in an era of mass communication. So, Anglicans are white equivalent of the jews (which we have known for 400 years, and is why we had the scientific revolution in britain, and both the English and Scottish enlightenments). If whites returned to practicing nepotism, and outlawed lying in the commons by involuntary warranty of due diligence, and elminated financialization – all of which are easy, the numbers would stabilize. My observation which I cannot find research to confirm or deny is that jews (“all jews are female”) have not only obtained female verbal ability, but the abilty of women to work on details for long periods of time. This ‘reverse dimorphism’ combined with culling of the underclasses, upward redistribution of reproduction to rabbis, extereme clannishness and nepotism, and specialization in extractive (immoral) professions explains the statistical differences. So, anglicans choose a wider distribution of careers, are not nepotistic but universal, and produce about as many outliers. Jews are people of words, deception, and mysticism, and europeans are people of metalsmithing, truth, and magic. We still specialize in our ancient traditional occupations. -
J-Bias, Anglicans vs Jews
The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is higher than the the jewish IQ: 112) The jewish distribution is WIDER (13.1 vs 11.1), with more at the bottom and more at the top. So they produce an extra 10% above 130, and it is 130 and 140’s that provide executive (130) and academic (140) competitive ability.
The size of the world jewish population is about 6.5m. World anglican population is about 85m. Jews pursue a narrower set of careers than Anglicans/Episcopalians. Jews practice more nepotism. And Jewish excellence, which is verbal, is in demand in an era of mass communication. So, Anglicans are white equivalent of the jews (which we have known for 400 years, and is why we had the scientific revolution in britain, and both the English and Scottish enlightenments). If whites returned to practicing nepotism, and outlawed lying in the commons by involuntary warranty of due diligence, and elminated financialization – all of which are easy, the numbers would stabilize. My observation which I cannot find research to confirm or deny is that jews (“all jews are female”) have not only obtained female verbal ability, but the abilty of women to work on details for long periods of time. This ‘reverse dimorphism’ combined with culling of the underclasses, upward redistribution of reproduction to rabbis, extereme clannishness and nepotism, and specialization in extractive (immoral) professions explains the statistical differences. So, anglicans choose a wider distribution of careers, are not nepotistic but universal, and produce about as many outliers. Jews are people of words, deception, and mysticism, and europeans are people of metalsmithing, truth, and magic. We still specialize in our ancient traditional occupations. -
ANGLICANS VS JEWS The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is h
ANGLICANS VS JEWS
The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is higher than the the jewish IQ: 112)
The jewish distribution is WIDER (13.1 vs 11.1), with more at the bottom… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=287168865213344&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 13:25:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033706918735499264
-
Psychologism of “jealousy’ does not address whether costs are imposed. They are.
Psychologism of “jealousy’ does not address whether costs are imposed. They are. Ergo it is not a psychologism, but a predation or parasitism.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 12:47:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033697547955654658
Reply addressees: @SmashMarxCult
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033696889974259712
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033696889974259712
-
“DO WHITE MEN FIND WOMEN OUTSIDE THEIR RACE ATTRACTIVE?”— (This seems like a v
—“DO WHITE MEN FIND WOMEN OUTSIDE THEIR RACE ATTRACTIVE?”—
(This seems like a very strange question. lol All women are attractive – especially at 19-23 years. It’s the whole point of being female. 😉 )
THE CORRECT ANSWER
Let me help you: **We are men**. **Every woman** that is healthy, and reasonably fit, and reasonably symmetrical (height weight proportionate) is attractive. (Just as every men who can garner attention from others and who possesses some wealth is attractive to women. supermodels and men in professional sports, or attractive professional women and wealthy entrepreneurs. Same everywhere. )
DIFFERENCES IN THE FREQUENCY OF DESIRABLE FEATURES
Of the *major* races and subraces ( african, semitic, iranic, western, indian, eastern, pacific) we vary greatly in our degree of neoteny (retention of childhood traits) that are associated with fertility (and desirability) for no other reason than the geography we evolved in – with cold favoring neoteny, and hot, not so. So some races tend to have more FREQUENTLY desirable features than other races while all races tend to produce some desirable women. (The aboriginals in australia have a low frequency of those traits, and east-slavic women have a high frequency of those traits. with celtic, german, and scandinavian women having a lower frequency than slavic women, but producing more extremes.)
DEGREES OF NEOTENY DUE TO REGIONS
The reason being that the desire for neoteny is high across all populations. East asians have the most neoteny but perhaps too much which is why the asymmetric demand for asian women vs men. Westerners have less morophlogical neoteny, and tend to retain higher demand for females than males in appearance, even if higher demand for males in behavior. This is true for indians as well. For Iranic and semitic the demand is lower for both males and females becuase of greater retention of sexual depth and maturity. And africans mature the fastest and the deepest, because they are in the most biologically hostile part of the world where children must mature quickly or die.
PRACTICALITY
We men are also **practical**: marrying within six degrees is ALWAYS better than the alternative for every possible reason, unless your own sexual market value is too low within six degrees.
(Lastly, and … unpleasantly perhaps, white men (although they will not admit it openly) operate under the belief that ‘women from lower classes’ are ‘cheaper and easier and require less effort’. I don’t actually think this is true. I think it’s just that in-group sensitivity to rejection is higher.)
OUTMARRIAGE RATES
So what we find in the west is about 15% outmarriage (racial mixture) with predictable overlap between black-hispanic, hispanic-white, white-asian, and asian-jewish populations. the reason being that at the top and bottom of each ‘tribe’, a ‘defector’ can obtain a higher sexual market value outside his or her group.
How do we know this? You wouldn’t believe how many people study this stuff and how exceptionally good that the data is – especially from all the dating sites.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 12:44:00 UTC
-
ANGLICANS VS JEWS The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is h
ANGLICANS VS JEWS
The highest average white IQ (Anglican/Episcopalian:113 ) is higher than the the jewish IQ: 112)
The jewish distribution is WIDER (13.1 vs 11.1), with more at the bottom and more at the top. So they produce an extra 10% above 130, and it is 130 and 140’s that provide executive (130) and academic (140) competitive ability.
The size of the world jewish population is about 6.5m. World anglican population is about 85m.
Jews pursue a narrower set of careers than Anglicans/Episcopalians. Jews practice more nepotism. And Jewish excellence, which is verbal, is in demand in an era of mass communication.
So, Anglicans are white equivalent of the jews (which we have known for 400 years, and is why we had the scientific revolution in britain, and both the English and Scottish enlightenments).
If whites returned to practicing nepotism, and outlawed fictionalism in the commons by involuntary warranty of due diligence, and elminated financialization – all of which are easy – the numbers would stabilize.
My observation which I cannot find research to confirm or deny is that jews have not only obtained female verbal ability, but the abilty of women to work on details for long periods of time. This ‘reverse dimorphism’ combined with culling of the underclasses, upward redistribution of reproduction to rabbis, extreme clannishness and nepotism, and specialization in extractive professions explains the statistical differences.
So, anglicans choose a wider distribution of careers, are not nepotistic but universal, and produce about as many outliers.
Jews are people of words, cunning, and mysticism, and europeans are people of metalsmithing, truth, and magic. We still specialize in our ancient traditional occupations.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 09:25:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/40110062_287156571881240_75675331706
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/40110062_287156571881240_7567533170673844224_n_287156568547907.jpg http://helmuthnyborg.dk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Publ_2009_The-Intellligence-Religiosity-Nexus.pdfhttp://helmuthnyborg.dk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Publ_2009_The-Intellligence-Religiosity-Nexus.pdf
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 08:48:00 UTC