Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Well, if parents are spending disproportionately more time with children but chi

    Well, if parents are spending disproportionately more time with children but children are getting WORSE, then what does that mean?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-20 08:10:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/42182269_10156650164812264_407059420

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/42182269_10156650164812264_4070594205842407424_n_10156650164807264.jpg MEN JUST CARE MORE – BUT NOT A LOT MORE

    (why? as in all things, specialization and bias for genetic fitness of a woman vs bias for productive fitness of a male)

    Sex Differences in the Desire for Physical Attractiveness. Wrong Interpretation: Men just care about looks, women about other stuff. Right Interpretation: Both sexes care a fair amount about looks, but on average men somewhat more.

    Long-Term Mate https://books.google.com.my/books?id=c85WCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA146

    SIGNALS MATTER AS WELLErik LukovskyIs it possible men care more on average because they just don’t think women have much more to offer other than looks?

    High status males often select for intelligent women too, but not too many exist so men just give up lookingSep 20, 2018, 8:40 AMAnjin Bodhisattva🙄Sep 20, 2018, 8:52 AMAnjin BodhisattvaMaybe intelligent women are looking for intelligent men?Sep 20, 2018, 8:53 AMMartin ŠtěpánAnjin Bodhisattva Yep. Not necessarily because of it but because intelligent men are much more likely to attain higher status.Sep 20, 2018, 9:08 AMErik LukovskyIf you want intelligent offspring, she has to at least be 115 or 120 IQ because of regression to the meanSep 20, 2018, 12:37 PMErik LukovskyI would love to see where that’s the case

    I’m not saying you’re wrong, but the stereotype of the ” stupid hot blonde bimbo ” is a stereotype for a reason

    Because it’s somewhat true

    Very pretty women have no reason to be immersed in subjects that matter

    That’s why usually a modest intelligent one seems biologically like a better catchSep 20, 2018, 12:49 PMErik LukovskyIf you look at all the smartest women alive(biologists, geneticists, inventors, or businesswomen) hardly any of them pass as supermodels

    If you look at the women most men crave physically(actresses and celebrities) then they are almost never above average IQ at bestSep 20, 2018, 12:51 PMWilliam J MullenSurveys on what people find attractive are useless, there are many motivations in play regarding their answers and truth isn’t very high on the list. Empiricism fails here due to an inability to measure the variables, thus we must turn to heuristics. This “data” is uncompelling to me, I still see looks as preeminent among male preference. Looks are preeminent among YOUNG female preference, fading in importance as they age when status then resources begin to play a larger role.Sep 20, 2018, 12:55 PMAnjin BodhisattvaConservative women do tend to be more attractive than liberals though 😉Sep 20, 2018, 12:58 PMWilliam J MullenPersonally, through experience I’ve learned that NOTHING trumps or replaces looks, the other stuff can only ENHANCE a woman who meets my physical standard. Without the physical lust, there is no “relationship”, just friendship.Sep 20, 2018, 1:46 PMWilliam J MullenOn the flip side, being very physically attractive but low in status (I have resources but typically hide this fact), I can’t help but notice that my attractiveness to women is reduced the older they are. Women 30’s+ don’t find me attractive whatsoever, with my baggage (3 kids) and appearance of low resources, whereas I can basically get any teenager I want.Sep 20, 2018, 1:49 PMErik LukovskyA few women being accomplished doesn’t change the general ruleSep 20, 2018, 1:56 PMErik LukovskyLook at Kim Kardashian, Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, Beyoncé, the list goes on and onSep 20, 2018, 1:58 PMErik LukovskyWell I said actresses and celebrities and yes, trust me, they do

    Most men think Scarlett Johannson is a 10Sep 20, 2018, 2:24 PMWilliam J MullenWomen to me offer nothing beyond their looks and ability to satisfy my sexual urges. They won’t be as smart, and the smarter they are the more prone they are to 1) arguing with me, and 2) getting butthurt when they lose those arguments. What matters most is subject matter interest… if they are interested in those things on which I am superior (which, face it, is everything since I’m a 48yo genius with incredible and unusual experience, and they are typically much younger and know nothing beyond their childhood home, some dumb university classes, and a Sex & the City career lifestyle) then we can get along, as we enjoy conversations where they mostly learn from me and entertain me with their own anecdotes.Sep 20, 2018, 2:26 PMWilliam J MullenThe hottest women are models; Hollywood has hardly any truly beautiful women, by my standard. I firmly believe that I could walk into any high school in America and walk out with 10 girls hotter than ScoJo, for example. There is Gadot today, there used to be Angelina… everyone else just seems to top out at around an 8, if you ask me.Sep 20, 2018, 2:27 PMWilliam J MullenI already have 3 kids, though, so I don’t have to worry about progeny. I do think Erik’s metric of intellect in a potential mother makes a lot of sense.Sep 20, 2018, 2:30 PMWilliam J MullenMeaning you don’t want to believe it, so it’s easier to think I’m just talking out my ear. Sure, believe what you like, it’s of no matter to me. Just offering my personal perspective.Sep 20, 2018, 2:38 PMWilliam J MullenI know I can, and it doesn’t cause me to exclude my children in any way. Your insults are predictable and banal… social shaming on emotional grounds. I’m never sure why my opinions and actions offend people in this regard, but fortunately I don’t really care about the opinions of the hoi polloi (just as I care little about the opinions of dogs).Sep 20, 2018, 2:45 PMWilliam J MullenSpeaking of Lohan, she once hit on me at a movie premier party. But I turned her down because she was chubby and gross at the time.Sep 20, 2018, 2:49 PMCarl EluMen want a pleasant woman that is not dumb. All extra IQ points over “not dumb” suffers from sharply diminishing returns.Sep 20, 2018, 4:58 PMMEN JUST CARE MORE – BUT NOT A LOT MORE

    (why? as in all things, specialization and bias for genetic fitness of a woman vs bias for productive fitness of a male)

    Sex Differences in the Desire for Physical Attractiveness. Wrong Interpretation: Men just care about looks, women about other stuff. Right Interpretation: Both sexes care a fair amount about looks, but on average men somewhat more.

    Long-Term Mate https://books.google.com.my/books?id=c85WCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA146

    SIGNALS MATTER AS WELL


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-20 07:49:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/42182269_10156650164812264_40705942

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/42182269_10156650164812264_4070594205842407424_n_10156650164807264.jpg MEN JUST CARE MORE – BUT NOT A LOT MORE

    (why? as in all things, specialization and bias for genetic fitness of a woman vs bias for productive fitness of a male)

    Sex Differences in the Desire for Physical Attractiveness. Wrong Interpretation: Men just care about looks, women about other stuff. Right Interpretation: Both sexes care a fair amount about looks, but on average men somewhat more.

    Long-Term Mate https://books.google.com.my/books?id=c85WCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA146

    SIGNALS MATTER AS WELLErik LukovskyIs it possible men care more on average because they just don’t think women have much more to offer other than looks?

    High status males often select for intelligent women too, but not too many exist so men just give up lookingSep 20, 2018 8:40amAnjin Bodhisattva🙄Sep 20, 2018 8:52amAnjin BodhisattvaMaybe intelligent women are looking for intelligent men?Sep 20, 2018 8:53amMartin ŠtěpánAnjin Bodhisattva Yep. Not necessarily because of it but because intelligent men are much more likely to attain higher status.Sep 20, 2018 9:08amErik LukovskyIf you want intelligent offspring, she has to at least be 115 or 120 IQ because of regression to the meanSep 20, 2018 12:37pmErik LukovskyI would love to see where that’s the case

    I’m not saying you’re wrong, but the stereotype of the ” stupid hot blonde bimbo ” is a stereotype for a reason

    Because it’s somewhat true

    Very pretty women have no reason to be immersed in subjects that matter

    That’s why usually a modest intelligent one seems biologically like a better catchSep 20, 2018 12:49pmErik LukovskyIf you look at all the smartest women alive(biologists, geneticists, inventors, or businesswomen) hardly any of them pass as supermodels

    If you look at the women most men crave physically(actresses and celebrities) then they are almost never above average IQ at bestSep 20, 2018 12:51pmWilliam J MullenSurveys on what people find attractive are useless, there are many motivations in play regarding their answers and truth isn’t very high on the list. Empiricism fails here due to an inability to measure the variables, thus we must turn to heuristics. This “data” is uncompelling to me, I still see looks as preeminent among male preference. Looks are preeminent among YOUNG female preference, fading in importance as they age when status then resources begin to play a larger role.Sep 20, 2018 12:55pmAnjin BodhisattvaConservative women do tend to be more attractive than liberals though 😉Sep 20, 2018 12:58pmWilliam J MullenPersonally, through experience I’ve learned that NOTHING trumps or replaces looks, the other stuff can only ENHANCE a woman who meets my physical standard. Without the physical lust, there is no “relationship”, just friendship.Sep 20, 2018 1:46pmWilliam J MullenOn the flip side, being very physically attractive but low in status (I have resources but typically hide this fact), I can’t help but notice that my attractiveness to women is reduced the older they are. Women 30’s+ don’t find me attractive whatsoever, with my baggage (3 kids) and appearance of low resources, whereas I can basically get any teenager I want.Sep 20, 2018 1:49pmErik LukovskyA few women being accomplished doesn’t change the general ruleSep 20, 2018 1:56pmErik LukovskyLook at Kim Kardashian, Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, Beyoncé, the list goes on and onSep 20, 2018 1:58pmErik LukovskyWell I said actresses and celebrities and yes, trust me, they do

    Most men think Scarlett Johannson is a 10Sep 20, 2018 2:24pmWilliam J MullenWomen to me offer nothing beyond their looks and ability to satisfy my sexual urges. They won’t be as smart, and the smarter they are the more prone they are to 1) arguing with me, and 2) getting butthurt when they lose those arguments. What matters most is subject matter interest… if they are interested in those things on which I am superior (which, face it, is everything since I’m a 48yo genius with incredible and unusual experience, and they are typically much younger and know nothing beyond their childhood home, some dumb university classes, and a Sex & the City career lifestyle) then we can get along, as we enjoy conversations where they mostly learn from me and entertain me with their own anecdotes.Sep 20, 2018 2:26pmWilliam J MullenThe hottest women are models; Hollywood has hardly any truly beautiful women, by my standard. I firmly believe that I could walk into any high school in America and walk out with 10 girls hotter than ScoJo, for example. There is Gadot today, there used to be Angelina… everyone else just seems to top out at around an 8, if you ask me.Sep 20, 2018 2:27pmWilliam J MullenI already have 3 kids, though, so I don’t have to worry about progeny. I do think Erik’s metric of intellect in a potential mother makes a lot of sense.Sep 20, 2018 2:30pmWilliam J MullenMeaning you don’t want to believe it, so it’s easier to think I’m just talking out my ear. Sure, believe what you like, it’s of no matter to me. Just offering my personal perspective.Sep 20, 2018 2:38pmWilliam J MullenI know I can, and it doesn’t cause me to exclude my children in any way. Your insults are predictable and banal… social shaming on emotional grounds. I’m never sure why my opinions and actions offend people in this regard, but fortunately I don’t really care about the opinions of the hoi polloi (just as I care little about the opinions of dogs).Sep 20, 2018 2:45pmWilliam J MullenSpeaking of Lohan, she once hit on me at a movie premier party. But I turned her down because she was chubby and gross at the time.Sep 20, 2018 2:49pmCarl OnniMen want a pleasant woman that is not dumb. All extra IQ points over “not dumb” suffers from sharply diminishing returns.Sep 20, 2018 4:58pmMEN JUST CARE MORE – BUT NOT A LOT MORE

    (why? as in all things, specialization and bias for genetic fitness of a woman vs bias for productive fitness of a male)

    Sex Differences in the Desire for Physical Attractiveness. Wrong Interpretation: Men just care about looks, women about other stuff. Right Interpretation: Both sexes care a fair amount about looks, but on average men somewhat more.

    Long-Term Mate https://books.google.com.my/books?id=c85WCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA146

    SIGNALS MATTER AS WELL


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-20 07:49:00 UTC

  • LADIES, IT’S ALL NATURE AND NO NURTURE Mothers need to feel it’s nurture. But la

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ng.3285SORRY LADIES, IT’S ALL NATURE AND NO NURTURE

    Mothers need to feel it’s nurture. But largely you can make your kids worse, but not better. So nurture is largely an effort not to let kids play in traffic. Otherwise it’s just genes.

    —“For a majority (69%) of traits, the observed twin correlations are consistent with a simple and parsimonious model where twin resemblance is solely due to additive genetic variation. The data are inconsistent with substantial influences from shared environment or non-additive genetic variation.”—

    THIS IS A HUGE STUDY

    —“We report a meta-analysis of twin correlations and reported variance components for 17,804 traits from 2,748 publications including 14,558,903 partly dependent twin pairs, virtually all published twin studies of complex traits. “—

    I’m gonna amplify this a bit and say that your extra attention is making kids more fragile and literally driving them mad.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ng.3285


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-20 07:17:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/42128091_10156650118592264_391460442

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/42128091_10156650118592264_3914604425330556928_o_10156650118587264.jpg MY FAVORITE FIND OF THE YEAR:

    via #SteveStuWill

    http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15923a/jdm15923a.pdfChris CantrellTwitter, they are talking about Twitter. Twitter is a breeding ground for P-PBS, and if it rhymes holy shit, people will start a cult over it.Sep 20, 2018, 8:37 AMMY FAVORITE FIND OF THE YEAR:

    via #SteveStuWill

    http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15923a/jdm15923a.pdf


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-20 07:07:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/42128091_10156650118592264_39146044

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/42128091_10156650118592264_3914604425330556928_o_10156650118587264.jpg MY FAVORITE FIND OF THE YEAR:

    via #SteveStuWill

    http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15923a/jdm15923a.pdfChris CantrellTwitter, they are talking about Twitter. Twitter is a breeding ground for P-PBS, and if it rhymes holy shit, people will start a cult over it.Sep 20, 2018 8:37amMY FAVORITE FIND OF THE YEAR:

    via #SteveStuWill

    http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15923a/jdm15923a.pdf


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-20 07:07:00 UTC

  • September 20th, 2018 8:14 AM [T]he distribution isn’t quite even. I love how the

    September 20th, 2018 8:14 AM [T]he distribution isn’t quite even. I love how they take from 85-115 as average. that’s ridiculous. 106 should be the dividing line, so that we talk about quality more so than the flatness of the distribution. Really 95-105 is average and we need 100-110 to be average.

  • September 20th, 2018 8:10 AM [W]ell, if parents are spending disproportionately

    September 20th, 2018 8:10 AM

    [W]ell, if parents are spending disproportionately more time with children but children are getting WORSE, then what does that mean?

  • September 20th, 2018 7:49 AM MEN JUST CARE MORE – BUT NOT A LOT MORE (why? as in

    September 20th, 2018 7:49 AM MEN JUST CARE MORE – BUT NOT A LOT MORE (why? as in all things, specialization and bias for genetic fitness of a woman vs bias for productive fitness of a male) Sex Differences in the Desire for Physical Attractiveness. Wrong Interpretation: Men just care about looks, women about other stuff. Right Interpretation: Both sexes care a fair amount about looks, but on average men somewhat more. Long-Term Mate https://books.google.com.my/books?id=c85WCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA146 SIGNALS MATTER AS WELL

  • September 20th, 2018 2:00 PM THE DAILY CIRCADIAN RHYTHM —“On average, after th

    September 20th, 2018 2:00 PM THE DAILY CIRCADIAN RHYTHM

    —“On average, after the workday begins, employees take a few hours to reach their peak levels of alertness and energy – and that peak does not last long. Not long after lunch, those levels begin to decline, hitting a low at around 3pm. We often blame this on lunch, but in reality this is just a natural part of the circadian process. After the 3pm dip, alertness tends to increase again until hitting a second peak at approximately 6pm. Following this, alertness tends to then decline for the rest of the evening and throughout the early morning hours until hitting the very lowest point at approximately 3:30am. After hitting that all-time low, alertness tends to increase for the rest of the morning until hitting the first peak shortly after noon the next day.”—