Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • September 22nd, 2018 1:30 PM [T]he hard thing to swallow is the lack of agency o

    September 22nd, 2018 1:30 PM

    [T]he hard thing to swallow is the lack of agency of all but a few. The rest are just gene machines, riders of propaganda on an elephant of r-biased genes.

  • September 22nd, 2018 8:53 AM by Dane Clum —“What is not mentioned is why WHITE

    September 22nd, 2018 8:53 AM by Dane Clum

    —“What is not mentioned is why WHITE women have been targeted by pulling on their heart strings, while it hasn’t happened to women of other races. To me it makes more sense to say: White people have higher empathy, and women have higher empathy than men, and lower awareness of the threats posed by incoming populations. Therefore, this current situation is a reflection of white societies empowering women in the sphere of politics to a much larger degree than other societies.”—

  • IQ BY DENOMINATION It’s what you’d think if you read Nine Nations and Albion’s s

    IQ BY DENOMINATION
    It’s what you’d think if you read Nine Nations and Albion’s seed.

    NOW BY WEALTH: mormons mormons mormons all the way home.

    WHY? That’s the question. Family. Discipline. Defense against hedonism.

    (Data from Razib Khan)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-21 23:07:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1043275527841349632

  • “It is suggested that IQ makes an individual likely to gravitate toward a denomi

    —“It is suggested that IQ makes an individual likely to gravitate toward a denomination and level of achievement that best fit his or hers particular level of cognitive complexity. Ontogenetically speaking this means that contemporary denominations are rank ordered by largely hereditary variations in brain efficiency (i.e. IQ). In terms of evolution, modern Atheists are reacting rationally to cognitive and emotional challenges, whereas Liberals and, in particular Dogmatics, still rely on ancient, pre-rational, supernatural and wishful thinking.”—-

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-21 20:04:00 UTC

  • A MORE PRODUCTIVE APPROACH by Carl Onni I think this is more productive: – Most

    A MORE PRODUCTIVE APPROACH

    by Carl Onni

    I think this is more productive:

    – Most if them do not know they are engaging in female behaviour. They are children not opponents.

    – Some of them will change to male behaviour if this is understood.

    -Those who never will change, will only gain by having an opponent they feel is easy to demonise.

    The goal of every interaction with these people should therefore be to simultaneously accomplish the following:

    – Demonstrate moral high ground, because we actually hold it, and it makes demonisation of us a more costly strategy and it makes conversion or productive communication more likely.

    – Shame and ridicule those that will never change, but only as a means to increase the odds of change in the subset that are capable of change.

    As with all children truth must be administered in manageable doses. Cant tell a 5 year old his paintings are terrible.

    But perhaps its most productive to just go full force Team Truth (TM)? But i have the suspicion it is only preaching to the choir.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-21 15:26:00 UTC

  • CODDLING AND CAUSE by John Mark This coddling Haidt writes about is a result of

    CODDLING AND CAUSE

    by John Mark

    This coddling Haidt writes about is a result of the West, particularly American parents, taking for granted the results of our world-leading rule of law (yes, far from perfect, but still fantastic compared to most of the world) and incomparable power for granted, and trying to take it too far.

    The parents of today’s millennials lived an era where the US had no competition, and was a whiteopia.

    For their kids, they are trying to create a situation where there is no conflict, and if any arises, an authority figure is summoned to punish the “troublemaker” (any boy with testosterone, anyone who questions the status quo/PC, anyone who is not “nice”, etc).

    In a sense it is the inverse of having a militia. Softness. Feminism. Etc. And the naivete manifests in their politics too.

    The lefties say “Everything would be great if it wasn’t for these Trump voters being so mean to people of color and gays”.

    The civnats have trouble wrapping their heads around the fact that the color invasion means America is f***ed. They can’t imagine that things could have gone so wrong so fast.

    They are living in a fantasy, wishful thinking, almost out of habit for having experienced so many years of prosperity without any real life or death conflict in this nation.

    They can’t grock that death is at the door.

    (Until the wise stop it.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-21 11:28:00 UTC

  • “There is a significant error in Peterson’s calculation. He claims that Jews wit

    —“There is a significant error in Peterson’s calculation.

    He claims that Jews with IQ’s of 145 or above are, in percentage terms, commensurate with their proportion of millionaires / billionaires. However his baseline for the total is merely the Jewish and White population.

    However, White Americans now make up little over 60% of the overall population. His baseline thus comprises only 63% of the total US population. To use the entire US population as a baseline would reduce millionaire numbers to 25% of the total.

    Peterson’s calculation therefore only adds up if he assumes that there exist no 145+ outside of the US’ White and Jewish populations.

    Although it might be argued that US adult population demographics are likely to increase the accuracy of Peterson’s baseline, it nevertheless remains considerably off.”— Aaron Kahland

    (Curt: as far as I know the jews just have a wider distribution than we do, just as I suspect east asians have a narrower distribution than we do. So this means that the Ashkenazi produce outliers just as the upper caste anglos doe. But that little difference means 2x 130+ and 1×140+ for every one of ours. And we tend to think of mathematics as calculation (it is) but language is also a form of calculation, and we have just (or I have just) begun to understand that language is a means of calculating (transforming inputs and outputs) in a market (competition) for signaling and influence, that produces continuous improvements in knowledge *IF* not impeded by error (supernatural, magical, ideal) all of which prohibit precision and increase error counter to the natural, scientific, and operational descriptions. Hence white performance in the physical era and jewish performance in the verbal era. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-21 11:01:00 UTC

  • September 21st, 2018 3:26 PM A MORE PRODUCTIVE APPROACH by Carl Onni I think thi

    September 21st, 2018 3:26 PM A MORE PRODUCTIVE APPROACH
    by Carl Onni I think this is more productive:

    • Most if them do not know they are engaging in female behaviour. They are children not opponents.


    • Some of them will change to male behaviour if this is understood.

    -Those who never will change, will only gain by having an opponent they feel is easy to demonise. The goal of every interaction with these people should therefore be to simultaneously accomplish the following:

    • Demonstrate moral high ground, because we actually hold it, and it makes demonisation of us a more costly strategy and it makes conversion or productive communication more likely.


    • Shame and ridicule those that will never change, but only as a means to increase the odds of change in the subset that are capable of change.

    As with all children truth must be administered in manageable doses. Cant tell a 5 year old his paintings are terrible. But perhaps its most productive to just go full force Team Truth (TM)? But i have the suspicion it is only preaching to the choir.

  • September 21st, 2018 11:28 AM CODDLING AND CAUSE by John Mark [T]his coddling Ha

    September 21st, 2018 11:28 AM CODDLING AND CAUSE
    by John Mark [T]his coddling Haidt writes about is a result of the West, particularly American parents, taking for granted the results of our world-leading rule of law (yes, far from perfect, but still fantastic compared to most of the world) and incomparable power for granted, and trying to take it too far. The parents of today’s millennials lived an era where the US had no competition, and was a whiteopia. For their kids, they are trying to create a situation where there is no conflict, and if any arises, an authority figure is summoned to punish the “troublemaker” (any boy with testosterone, anyone who questions the status quo/PC, anyone who is not “nice”, etc). In a sense it is the inverse of having a militia. Softness. Feminism. Etc. And the naivete manifests in their politics too. The lefties say “Everything would be great if it wasn’t for these Trump voters being so mean to people of color and gays”. The civnats have trouble wrapping their heads around the fact that the color invasion means America is f***ed. They can’t imagine that things could have gone so wrong so fast. They are living in a fantasy, wishful thinking, almost out of habit for having experienced so many years of prosperity without any real life or death conflict in this nation. They can’t grock that death is at the door. (Until the wise stop it.)

  • September 21st, 2018 11:01 AM —“There is a significant error in Peterson’s cal

    September 21st, 2018 11:01 AM

    —“There is a significant error in Peterson’s calculation. He claims that Jews with IQ’s of 145 or above are, in percentage terms, commensurate with their proportion of millionaires / billionaires. However his baseline for the total is merely the Jewish and White population. However, White Americans now make up little over 60% of the overall population. His baseline thus comprises only 63% of the total US population. To use the entire US population as a baseline would reduce millionaire numbers to 25% of the total. Peterson’s calculation therefore only adds up if he assumes that there exist no 145+ outside of the US’ White and Jewish populations. Although it might be argued that US adult population demographics are likely to increase the accuracy of Peterson’s baseline, it nevertheless remains considerably off.”— Aaron Kahland

    (by Curt:
    As far as I know the jews just have a wider distribution than we do, just as I suspect east asians have a narrower distribution than we do. So this means that the Ashkenazi produce outliers just as the upper caste anglos doe. But that little difference means 2x 130+ and 1×140+ for every one of ours. And we tend to think of mathematics as calculation (it is) but language is also a form of calculation, and we have just (or I have just) begun to understand that language is a means of calculating (transforming inputs and outputs) in a market (competition) for signaling and influence, that produces continuous improvements in knowledge IF not impeded by error (supernatural, magical, ideal) all of which prohibit precision and increase error counter to the natural, scientific, and operational descriptions. Hence white performance in the physical era and jewish performance in the verbal era. )