Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553442870 Timestamp) THE SERIES OF GRAMMARS PSYCHOLOGY (important) (read this) —“is there any smaller sphere in which you think psychoanalysis is an appropriate method or inquiry? (ie, hopefully the one it is intended for – personal therapy rather than public argumentation).”— Gerard I think that it is always better to use this series:

    1. Means: Personality traits and reward systems. (anglo/physical)

    2. Cause: Acquisitionism and Propertarianism.(masculine/objective)

    3. Training: Stoicism (Acquisition of virtues by CBT)

    4 Affect(Heroic): Jungian ( Archetypes as proxies for traits) (german, sympathetic)

    1. Defect:(Victim)Freudian Analysis (feminine conformity) (Jewish feminine)

    This series begins with the most precise but least experiential and moves to the least precise but must experiential. Personally I would prefer, that we use the above series just like the series math, physics, chemistry, biology, cooperation (sentience/economics), speech (negotiation), that we all knew the hierarchy of those from the most physical to the most experiential, and as such that we understood how each expresses a more fictional but more experiential grammar as we proceed down that list. This series is as important as: 1. The hierarchy of Measurements (mathematics) 2. The hierarchy of States of Matter (physical science) 3. The hierarchy of Grammars (language) 4. The hierarchy of Knowledge (aristotelian categories)

  • (FB 1553440354 Timestamp) Quote by Michael Abbott CurtD: Correct. Although, we c

    (FB 1553440354 Timestamp) Quote by Michael Abbott CurtD: Correct. Although, we can say, conversely, that both freudian theory, and feminine strategy, are genetic expressions of the same interests, and that neither freud nor woman chooses their strategy, but is an animal barely conscious, and simply following baser instinct.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553454841 Timestamp) —“There is no such thing as innocence, only varying degrees of guilt.”— Corey Harms

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553454841 Timestamp) —“There is no such thing as innocence, only varying degrees of guilt.”— Corey Harms

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553530740 Timestamp) Chivalry is a means of paying status signals to the strong voluntarily, rather than the strong producing status signals by one’s forcible submission involuntarily.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553525333 Timestamp) You can’t REASON with them. They do not use reason. They can’t. It is against their reproductive interests which is why all leftism(equality) is lies kleptocracy, and dysgenics. Because rightism (aristocracy) is truth, reciprocity, and eugenics.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553530740 Timestamp) Chivalry is a means of paying status signals to the strong voluntarily, rather than the strong producing status signals by one’s forcible submission involuntarily.

  • (FB 1553627485 Timestamp) WOMEN ALWAYS EAT EACH OTHER. NEVER WORK FOR A WOMAN

    (FB 1553627485 Timestamp) WOMEN ALWAYS EAT EACH OTHER. NEVER WORK FOR A WOMAN.

  • (FB 1553627485 Timestamp) WOMEN ALWAYS EAT EACH OTHER. NEVER WORK FOR A WOMAN

    (FB 1553627485 Timestamp) WOMEN ALWAYS EAT EACH OTHER. NEVER WORK FOR A WOMAN.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553709016 Timestamp) —“I just realized that if the Jews went through a genetic bottleneck where they transferred female-primary traits to the males and thus the entire gene pool, that would probably mean the psychological profile of hypergamy got transferred too. This may also make sense of why the caricatures of them portray them as what basically amounts to a dependent female opportunistically switching men (host nations) when the harpy has sucked him dry of resources and his capacity to self-direct by interfering with his perception (media), manufacturing discord in his social circle, etc.”— I told you that this was the reason. It’s genetic. you can’t ‘convince’ them any more than you can convince women. Now we just need 20 years of research to narrow the genes down so we can describe how. That said iv’e been studying this problem forever and it’s pretty obvious. “They’re all female” Hence we need law to defend against female traits.