(FB 1552922192 Timestamp) People feel no sense of control. Most of this is due to the fact that they don’t, the rest to the media, the rest to the destruction of the family, the rest to mobility.
Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1552922192 Timestamp) People feel no sense of control. Most of this is due to the fact that they don’t, the rest to the media, the rest to the destruction of the family, the rest to mobility.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553033983 Timestamp) by Alain Dwight We desire the safety and productivity of high trust commons, so nearly everyone shares our instincts to some degree. There is a significant subset of people within that also share our instincts regarding much of the “how,” but they were left moralizing and justifying because no one had yet codified the science of reciprocity, co-operation, and deconflation. Those opposed to the “how” might be more numerous, but in the end, they want the same sort of commons that anyone else would desire. They just don’t want to pay the price, and unfortunately for many of them they might not survive paying the price (those who expanded their underclasses beyond the capacity of their middle and upper to provide for will incur large losses when their free ride is revoked). In that sense, they are damned if they do and damned if they don’t, the free riding isn’t viable long term. This is the price for the productive to have a fighting chance.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553022779 Timestamp) PILL CLARITY. 😉 by Greg Hamilton Blue (BP) is narrative, … Red(RP) is reality, … … Black(BP) is nihilism, … … … White(WP) is hope. Hope for the future: WP. Being realistic about the situation: RP. If you’re pointing out the reality: RP Selling nihilism: BP Acknowledging the system will fail is just RP.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553033983 Timestamp) by Alain Dwight We desire the safety and productivity of high trust commons, so nearly everyone shares our instincts to some degree. There is a significant subset of people within that also share our instincts regarding much of the “how,” but they were left moralizing and justifying because no one had yet codified the science of reciprocity, co-operation, and deconflation. Those opposed to the “how” might be more numerous, but in the end, they want the same sort of commons that anyone else would desire. They just don’t want to pay the price, and unfortunately for many of them they might not survive paying the price (those who expanded their underclasses beyond the capacity of their middle and upper to provide for will incur large losses when their free ride is revoked). In that sense, they are damned if they do and damned if they don’t, the free riding isn’t viable long term. This is the price for the productive to have a fighting chance.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553022779 Timestamp) PILL CLARITY. 😉 by Greg Hamilton Blue (BP) is narrative, … Red(RP) is reality, … … Black(BP) is nihilism, … … … White(WP) is hope. Hope for the future: WP. Being realistic about the situation: RP. If you’re pointing out the reality: RP Selling nihilism: BP Acknowledging the system will fail is just RP.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553264111 Timestamp) WOMEN ARE NOT COMPLICATED Women are not all that complicated. Just fully pay attention, fully listen, show that you understand by paraphrasing. Don’t solve any problem that they don’t ask you to solve. And don’t WANT anything from them. Just engage in THEIR exchange of ‘connection’. Most female speech consists of seeking ‘settlement’ of possible ‘debts’ between females by external weight and measure. Once you understand this women are merely machines of debt settlement just as men are machines of productivity measurement.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553264111 Timestamp) WOMEN ARE NOT COMPLICATED Women are not all that complicated. Just fully pay attention, fully listen, show that you understand by paraphrasing. Don’t solve any problem that they don’t ask you to solve. And don’t WANT anything from them. Just engage in THEIR exchange of ‘connection’. Most female speech consists of seeking ‘settlement’ of possible ‘debts’ between females by external weight and measure. Once you understand this women are merely machines of debt settlement just as men are machines of productivity measurement.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553442870 Timestamp) THE SERIES OF GRAMMARS PSYCHOLOGY (important) (read this) —“is there any smaller sphere in which you think psychoanalysis is an appropriate method or inquiry? (ie, hopefully the one it is intended for – personal therapy rather than public argumentation).”— Gerard I think that it is always better to use this series:
- Means: Personality traits and reward systems. (anglo/physical)
Cause: Acquisitionism and Propertarianism.(masculine/objective)
Training: Stoicism (Acquisition of virtues by CBT)
4 Affect(Heroic): Jungian ( Archetypes as proxies for traits) (german, sympathetic)
- Defect:(Victim)Freudian Analysis (feminine conformity) (Jewish feminine)
This series begins with the most precise but least experiential and moves to the least precise but must experiential. Personally I would prefer, that we use the above series just like the series math, physics, chemistry, biology, cooperation (sentience/economics), speech (negotiation), that we all knew the hierarchy of those from the most physical to the most experiential, and as such that we understood how each expresses a more fictional but more experiential grammar as we proceed down that list. This series is as important as: 1. The hierarchy of Measurements (mathematics) 2. The hierarchy of States of Matter (physical science) 3. The hierarchy of Grammars (language) 4. The hierarchy of Knowledge (aristotelian categories)
-
(FB 1553440354 Timestamp) Quote by Michael Abbott CurtD: Correct. Although, we c
(FB 1553440354 Timestamp) Quote by Michael Abbott CurtD: Correct. Although, we can say, conversely, that both freudian theory, and feminine strategy, are genetic expressions of the same interests, and that neither freud nor woman chooses their strategy, but is an animal barely conscious, and simply following baser instinct.