RT @RachelBock9: When I was a feminist I didn’t understand: “feminists destroy the family.”
Science progressed. I worked 70+ hr weeks, che…
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-18 15:21:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185214426405855233
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Diversity-Biology-Gender-Class/dp/1538744015/CHARLES MURRAY PUTS IT ON THE LINE
https://www.amazon.com/Human-Diversity-Biology-Gender-Class/dp/1538744015/
(via Ahmed Reda)Updated Oct 18, 2019, 2:43 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-18 14:43:00 UTC
Differences create potential opportunities create adaptive stresses. So the question is how to also train us (stoicism, epicureanism) to prefer adaptive stresses, rather than to ignore them (buddhism) or (equality, christianity, islamism) to resist them. Answer is obvious.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 19:42:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184917606039457795
Reply addressees: @johann_theron
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184902589269336067
IN REPLY TO:
@johann_theron
@curtdoolittle Yes. I found that high trust allows technology jumps while low(er) trust result in incremental improvements on person by person basis. Not sure which is better. Maybe half half?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184902589269336067
From Uncle Eli Harman:
Woman: “My husband is like one more child…”
Me, an Intellectual: “Literally all your faculties evolved to deal with children, so if all you have is a hammer…”… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=486484228615139&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 16:18:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184866334024306688
From Uncle Eli Harman:
Woman: “My husband is like one more child…”
Me, an Intellectual: “Literally all your faculties evolved to deal with children, so if all you have is a hammer…”
ANALYSIS
1) women control 80% of household spending
2) women control 70% of retail spending
3) women control 70% of government resources
Men give women their resources and want something for them. Women consume give their children, or give to child substitutes, like pets or ‘the disadvantaged’, those resources. and expect only their own psychological rewards for having done so. The relationship between men and women is not equal.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 12:18:00 UTC
WOMEN NOW BLAME THE PATRIARCH (MEN) INSTEAD OF THE DEVIL
—“Women are higher in empathizing on the empathy/systems spectrum. This makes them more likely to attribute some will to mere emergent properties of systems (like nature). This makes them more religious. Except now they don’t blame the devil but the patriarchy.”—Martin Štěpán
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 09:04:00 UTC
The presumption of ignorance and error is a polite manifestation of western ethics of discourse, but it is not however evidenced in history. We err far less than we deceive, and the vast majority of thought is but elaborate deception to perpetuate one fraud, another, or many.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 20:47:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184571621970980868
Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184571257846747137
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@MattPirkowski Hmm… I had to work on the eradication of deceit, and came to the opposite conclusion: that conceptual development is discernibly either reciprocal or irreciprocal(fraud), and thus the judgement is possible and necessary: one dark age of ignorance and deceit is enough.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184571257846747137
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@MattPirkowski Hmm… I had to work on the eradication of deceit, and came to the opposite conclusion: that conceptual development is discernibly either reciprocal or irreciprocal(fraud), and thus the judgement is possible and necessary: one dark age of ignorance and deceit is enough.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184571257846747137
I am aware that it’s an uneven contest but I’ll happily debate anyone intellectually honest: Women are excessively privileged, and failing to learn, just like all other peoples have failed to learn, from the lessons of european achievement in the ancient and modern world: Trade.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 22:00:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227519022714883
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227518133555201
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
If you can’t make a moral argument in economic terms either you lack the intellectual ability or you are engaging in some for of fraud by deceit. This is yet another book doing the latter. And then feminists wonder why men are losing patience with the experiment of the franchise.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227518133555201
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
If you can’t make a moral argument in economic terms either you lack the intellectual ability or you are engaging in some for of fraud by deceit. This is yet another book doing the latter. And then feminists wonder why men are losing patience with the experiment of the franchise.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227518133555201
I mean, this is another use of Female Gossiping, Shaming, Ridiculing, Moralizing, Psychologizing, Suggestion, Obscurantism, Sophism and Critique (straw manning) completely ignoring both truth vs falsehood and the necessity of cooperative exchange vs gender specific ideals.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 22:00:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227516552302593
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227515734417408
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
—“It also emerges that the failure to recognize women as human”– No, just that women are unequal to men in the foundations of european successes: truth, reciprocity, duty, markets, and meritocracy, and so far have demanded concessions in every aspect of life to accommodate.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227515734417408
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
—“It also emerges that the failure to recognize women as human”– No, just that women are unequal to men in the foundations of european successes: truth, reciprocity, duty, markets, and meritocracy, and so far have demanded concessions in every aspect of life to accommodate.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227515734417408
Kate: study physics, economics, cognitive science, and developmental biology emphasizing gender and class differences. Then study the differences in mental illness, anti-social behavior, and conflict between men and women instead of philosophy: the language of sophism and deceit.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 22:00:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227512332836864
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227511481389056
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Men = Material Economics,Physics, Constraint (Reals)
Women = Emotional Economics, Manipulation, Consumption (feels).
“M:Stress over failing to advance” versus “F:Fear of being left behind”.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227511481389056
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
Men = Material Economics,Physics, Constraint (Reals)
Women = Emotional Economics, Manipulation, Consumption (feels).
“M:Stress over failing to advance” versus “F:Fear of being left behind”.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227511481389056