Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • You are demonstrating a common feminine cognitive bias of overestimating the deg

    You are demonstrating a common feminine cognitive bias of overestimating the degree to which others agree with you. I am a man. I only estimate the degree to which a given set of incentives will produce the desired action in a given set of people.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 02:27:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224157393665347584

    Reply addressees: @HeadProph @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224155311998676996


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224155311998676996

  • No we just weigh more positives and negatives than you do. Do the research. Cons

    No we just weigh more positives and negatives than you do. Do the research. Conservatives account for everything, and Consumptives use ‘selective accounting’ (cherrypicking). Again: female brain structure.

    The solution to left right is no reproduction without production.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 00:39:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224130173806792704

    Reply addressees: @WhiteWhiskers0 @FloraMaeBaker @MercuryFeetBC @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto @BarackObama @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224105239625838593


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224105239625838593

  • SOME BIASES TO CONSIDER 😉 False uniqueness bias …The tendency of people to se

    SOME BIASES TO CONSIDER 😉

    False uniqueness bias

    …The tendency of people to see their projects and themselves as more singular than they actually are.

    False consensus effect

    … The tendency for people to overestimate the degree to which others agree with them

    Bandwagon effect

    … The tendency to do (or believe) things because many other people do (or believe) the same. Related to groupthink and herd behavior

    Empathy gap

    … The tendency to underestimate the influence or strength of feelings, in either oneself or others

    Groupthink

    … Where the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome.

    Shared information bias

    … The tendency for group members to spend more time and energy discussing information that all members are already familiar with (i.e., shared information), and less time and energy discussing information that only some members are aware of (i.e., unshared information).

    Illusion of asymmetric insight

    …People perceive their knowledge of their peers to surpass their peers’ knowledge of them

    Illusion of transparency

    … People overestimate others’ ability to know themselves, and they also overestimate their ability to know others.

    Dunning–Kruger effect

    … The tendency for unskilled individuals to overestimate their own ability and the tendency for experts to underestimate their own ability

    Curse of knowledge

    … When better-informed people find it extremely difficult to think about problems from the perspective of lesser-informed people

    Illusory superiority

    … Overestimating one’s desirable qualities, and underestimating undesirable qualities, relative to other people. (Also known as “better-than-average effect”, or “superiority bias”.)

    Naïve realism

    … The belief that we see reality objectively and without bias; that the facts are plain for all to see; that rational people will agree with us; and that those who don’t are either uninformed, lazy, irrational, or biased.

    Just-world hypothesis

    … The tendency for people to want to believe that the world is fundamentally just, causing them to rationalize an otherwise inexplicable injustice as deserved by the victim(s).

    Ambiguity effect

    … The tendency to avoid options for which the probability of a favorable outcome is unknown

    Anchoring

    …. The tendency to rely too heavily, or “anchor”, on one trait or piece of information when making decisions (usually the first piece of information acquired on that subject)

    Doubling Down

    … Or Backfire effect. The reaction to disconfirming evidence by strengthening one’s previous beliefs.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 23:05:00 UTC

  • (There are very few intellectually honest and articulate progressives. This is a

    (There are very few intellectually honest and articulate progressives. This is a great opportunity to illustrate the differences caused by the effect of our genes on our cognition – presumption of agency and free will.) https://t.co/9rSTjMsxgy


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 13:27:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223961055187161090

    Reply addressees: @flancian

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223951554862034946


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223951554862034946

  • We must use TRADE to bridge our differences. (Are you starting to see yet?) I’m

    We must use TRADE to bridge our differences.
    (Are you starting to see yet?)

    I’m using male concrete (scientific) terms.
    You’re using female seductive (deceptive) terms.

    Once you see it you can’t un-see it. The question is adaptation possible? No. Hence institutions of trade.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 13:21:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223959529425117186

    Reply addressees: @flancian

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223950825883668482


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223950825883668482

  • Progressives (consumptives) err on the side of consumption in the face of uncert

    Progressives (consumptives) err on the side of consumption in the face of uncertainty. Conservatives(capitalizers) err on the side of saving in the face of uncertainty.

    The female consumptive herd (her children) the male capitalizing pack (their tribe).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 13:19:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223959130504859650

    Reply addressees: @flancian

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223950825883668482


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223950825883668482

  • Left temporal, Right inter-temporal

    Left temporal, Right inter-temporal.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 12:35:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223947957810147336

    Reply addressees: @flancian

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223947619552169984


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @flancian Assertion: all differences are reducible to right reciprocal falsificationary eugenic vs left proportional justificationary dysgenic, and as such, decidable. a such all left propositions must be reducible to approval/disapproval, and right truth/falsehood.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223947619552169984


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @flancian Assertion: all differences are reducible to right reciprocal falsificationary eugenic vs left proportional justificationary dysgenic, and as such, decidable. a such all left propositions must be reducible to approval/disapproval, and right truth/falsehood.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223947619552169984

  • Favorite teacher tactic. Some kid misbehaves. Get the class to turn on him or he

    Favorite teacher tactic. Some kid misbehaves. Get the class to turn on him or her and say they don’t like him or her if they do that kind of thing.

    Completely against current educational protocol.

    Absolutely positively the fastest, most effective means of behavioral modification, with the most durable consequences, and with the most beneficial externalities.

    People don’t know how to teach and we get snowflakes.

    Why?

    Mothers feel guilty.

    Because they deserve to.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 11:18:00 UTC

  • One of the reasons for edgy posts is to ‘out’ stalkers. Bait works every time. ;

    One of the reasons for edgy posts is to ‘out’ stalkers.

    Bait works every time. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 02:49:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223800608978874374

  • Do you think females think about sh-t testing men, undermining dominance hierarc

    Do you think females think about sh-t testing men, undermining dominance hierarchies, raiding status through undermining others by gossiping, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing, outraging, ridicule, and rallying? No. It’s genetic disposition.
    (((They))) are cognitively female.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 02:37:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223797446721052672