You can judge an class by the properties of its individuals but you cannot judge an individual by the property of his class. However, classes act politically in concert regardless of cross-class personal relationships. https://twitter.com/charlesmurray/status/1224312954092498947
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 12:54:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224315151224057863
https://twitter.com/charlesmurray/status/1224312954092498947
MOST COMMON LIE IN GENETICS: MORE SIMILAR THAN NOT
—“More similar than different can be said about us and chimps”–Göran Dahl
When discussing genetics “more similar than different’ is a pseudoscientific, and pseudo-mathematical lie. There is even a name for it: “Lewontin’s Fallacy”. Or we can just call it postmodern denialism and igorance. Any of those labels will do.
Very minor changes appear to have very vast consequences and some groups have accumulated better minor changes and others worse minor changes (genetic load).
Same is true for rate of calculation of adaption. The rate of adaption depends largely on the number of life forms, the life span, the frequency of generations, the environmental pressures of a given locality, the available means of expressing fitness, the possibility of non local reproduction(travelled); the complexity of the life form(size of the information), the expressed population of the genome, whether it’s RNA(adaptive) or DNA(error checking), asexual or sexual, and the number of points in the replication process that errors can insert, delete, and survive, and some factors we don’t clearly understand yet, that facilitate or inhibit those changes and rates of change.
DNA(RNA) is a supercomputer that works at chemical rather than electrical velocity.
There are say, 5m SNP’s (blocks, instructions) and that is not all that can change – in an individuals genome, and 100m active SNPs worldwide.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 12:26:00 UTC
https://youtu.be/CdkmIpDQ3i0?t=100LOW AGENCY PEOPLE ARE OVERWHELMED BY IMPULSE
Noah J Revoy
People respond to anger in different ways, depending on their level of Agency.
For low Agency people anger is an overwhelming experience.
They want quick, violent action. They get physically affected. They yell, stop their feet and rage. Really, they are seeking rapid relief at any cost from an emotion they are not trained to handle. (Reminds me of a toddler).
For high Agency people the anger experience is different. We get angry, but it makes us calm, focused, quiet. We ride the anger, we dont let it ride us. In the end we are far more dangerous this way.
Proof: Ask yourself, how does a special operations soldier (high combat Agency) react to fear and anger vs a normal soldier vs an untrained civilian?
https://youtu.be/CdkmIpDQ3i0?t=100Updated Feb 3, 2020, 12:08 PM
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 12:08:00 UTC
1. Cognitive Spectrum: Female Psychotic Solipsistic Sensitive Agreeable < Balanced > Disagreeable, Insensitive, Analytic, Autistic Male
2. Conflict: Female: Social Predation: Undermine Until Destroyed. Male: Political Predation: Fight For Position then Settle.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 11:29:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224293874820141059
Reply addressees: @HeadProph @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224292687974752256
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@HeadProph @realDonaldTrump There are only so many dimensions of variation in human development with the most influential being the male-female, and the consequences of male-female developmental differences in cognitive emotional physical outcomes and the expression of sexual strategy in all three.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224292687974752256
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@HeadProph @realDonaldTrump There are only so many dimensions of variation in human development with the most influential being the male-female, and the consequences of male-female developmental differences in cognitive emotional physical outcomes and the expression of sexual strategy in all three.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224292687974752256
There are only so many dimensions of variation in human development with the most influential being the male-female, and the consequences of male-female developmental differences in cognitive emotional physical outcomes and the expression of sexual strategy in all three.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 11:24:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224292687974752256
Reply addressees: @HeadProph @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224188167907106818
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224188167907106818
Twitter users are biased to low productivity clerically employed sedentary urbanites who have no children or capital. That’s the opposite profile. Most people who know me or my work are the opposite, and do so by word of mouth. We are the largest, best armed army in the world.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 11:17:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224290746704056320
Reply addressees: @HeadProph @NISquadron @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224200375554756608
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224200375554756608
Bell curves in everything. They don’t move the needle.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 11:10:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224289002875953152
Reply addressees: @Mizar70461668 @AdielleAS @GettyImagesNews @woolstonphoto
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224266789606981637
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224266789606981637
IDEOLOGICAL MOTIVATIONS, OPTIONS AND OUTCOMES
People who want status or attention because they are rejected by the groups they work, live, or associate with, seek some sort of means of feeling they are winning – so they find a single lever (libertarianism, leftism, a philosophical frame, or a religion) and double down on it because it is their only means of obtaining some sense of success in the world through the expression of their preferences by dominance rather than by cooperation. This is an understandable human behavior. We cannot expect people to not negotiate or advance (or bully) for obtaining resources, status, cooperation, in a world where all three are scarce. … However, regardless of our preferences and wants we can argue for reciprocity or we can argue for irreciprocity. Or we can simply act irreciprocally by conquest if negotiation does not succeed, and separation is not possible. So one can argue in concert with the physical world or not. One can argue in concert with the social world or not. One can act in concert with the social world or not. But the reverse of each of those statements cannot be said, without one being a fool, a liar, and a thief – and thereby abandoning your sovereignty and entering into a condition of war where all morality is off the table. P is a method. That method defines reciprocity. And it states the limit of that reciprocity. And beyond that reciprocity there is no moral question – only war.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 10:25:00 UTC
UNREGULATED (WITHOUT LIMITS) WOMEN
by Eliza Thentor
I realised this is my conflict with my daughter. ” Unregulated women ” . She is surrounded by girls who are much much less regulated than she is, and many are spoiled. One particular, who I thought, after a few conversations with mother, that mother was very shallow and something was not right. I learned last week, the woman has been years on anti-anxiety tablets and could not stay at home and therefore “had” to go to work because of muh anxiety and depression. This mother showers the girl with lots lots of money, out of guilt. So I try to regulate my daughter (as I come from a military father who regulated us) and she causes a big confusion at home, because her friends probably nag her or give her “advice” about me on the phone.Updated Feb 3, 2020, 7:07 AM
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 07:07:00 UTC
WHY DO YOU REDUCE SO MUCH TO MALE VS FEMALE?
To explain causality.
There are only so many dimensions of variation in human development with the most influential being the male-female, and the consequences of male-female developmental differences in cognitive emotional physical outcomes and the expression of sexual strategy in all three.
1. Cognitive Spectrum: Female Psychotic Solipsistic Sensitive Agreeable < Balanced > Disagreeable, Insensitive, Analytic, Autistic Male
2. Conflict: Female: Social Predation: Undermine Until Destroyed. Male: Political Predation: Fight For Position then Settle.
This pair of differences explain the Left(Female Social Temporal Consumptive Strategy) vs Right (Male Political Intertemporal Capitalizing Strategy) and (a) our political differences are not a choice (b) they are no longer compatible and we need to separate and *speciate*.
Conservative (european) market order is the compromise between the gender strategies, at the cost of limiting the reproduction of the unproductive. All other strategies are MORE male, and the left wants MORE female.
Ok. Have it. Separate Specialize.
And you will have slums.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 06:37:00 UTC