Curt Doolittle

Category: Human Behavior and Cognitive Science

  • Women function by seduction of men by sex and affection,women by attention and a

    Women function by seduction of men by sex and affection,women by attention and alliance, children by affection, caretaking and protection,so trying to get women to stop using seduction masculinize them. The question isn’t whether they’re seducing, but whether the promise is true.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 17:03:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227639393508306945

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227634002963697664

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227634002963697664

  • NO MORE WOO WOO IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE PLEASE —-“A widespread misconception in m

    NO MORE WOO WOO IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE PLEASE

    —-“A widespread misconception in much of psychology holds that as vertebrate animals evolved, ‘newer’ brain structures were added over existing ‘older’ brain structures”

    Your Brain Is Not an Onion with a Tiny Reptile Inside

    A widespread misconception in much of psychology holds that (1) as vertebrate animals evolved, “newer” brain structures were added over existing “older” brain structures and (2) these newer,….. “All vertebrates possess the same basic brain—and forebrain—regions. … [None] are evolutionarily newer in some mammals than others. … even the prefrontal cortex, a region associated with reason and action planning, is not a uniquely human structure.”— Robin Hanson @robinhanson

    A statement without meaning – there’s only one cell type in the nervous system, three subtypes, but almost countless variation that all functional regions in the brain evolved from. So what? Does that mean we can’t demarcate dramatic evolutionary leaps in function by organism?

    To say that a fish is sentient and aware is true. To say it is conscious is to demand we define the spectrum of predictive models capable for the organism, and its ability to react vs choose vs reason vs calculate vs calculate transformations of state vs calculate cooperation.

    So if the point is to clarify that the brain is just a collection of similar cells in various forms of organization, and that for all intents and purposes our brain is an outgrowth of our consciousness (modeling of our body and movement in space) yes.

    To equate sentience (feeling of changes in state), and awareness (of change instate of environment) and semi-consciousness (prediction of future states and possible reactions), consciousness (prediction of future permutations of state), to transformations of state is a leap.

    If the question is ‘who is the observer’ (which I suspect is the origin of most problems in philosophy and cognitive science) it’s memory of the last few memories recursively processed as a stream of changes in model in the hippocampal region.

    Consciousness is a verb not a noun.

    Why do I care? No more woo woo in cognitive science please. If you can’t pass the mirror test, the gesture test, sympathy test (cooperation), demonstrate natural operational grammar (language), and create multi-part tools, or enter into agreement (consent) then you’re far behind.

    The difference between the engine of a 3d video game and the human brain turns out to be terrifyingly small. We just do everything in massive parallel and at a much lower voltage and current because of it, and we do the prediction as well as the construction.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 14:47:00 UTC

  • THE LIMITS OF P IN MATE RELATIONSHIPS —“I’ve falling in love with the phrase,

    THE LIMITS OF P IN MATE RELATIONSHIPS

    —“I’ve falling in love with the phrase, “Baiting into hazard”. I use it on my wife almost daily. She looks at me funny. That’s ok, she can’t help it. It’s genetic.”—@EricLiford

    Women function by seduction of men by sex and affection; women by attention, cooperation, alliance, and insurance; and children by affection, information, care taking, dependency, and protection. So trying to get women to stop using seduction will just masculinize them and lose all their value as the central unit of family and social cooperation. The question isn’t whether women are seducing you, but whether the promise offered by their seduction is true.

    Just don’t lie to each other.

    It’s not complicated.

    You will find both men and women who make false promises in order to obtain discounts on acquisition of experience, information, cooperation, consumption, or capital. Men have only loyalty and strength women have only devotion and seduction.

    Let women be women. Encourage them to be women. The more seduction in the world the more wonderful it is. The only question is whether it’s a false promise or an truthful reciprocal, warrantied offer of exchange.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 12:09:00 UTC

  • Offense is the natural state of a large percent of the population

    Offense is the natural state of a large percent of the population

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 08:47:00 UTC

  • 8) Some of us are more than semi domesticated animals sensing, perceiving, feeli

    8) Some of us are more than semi domesticated animals sensing, perceiving, feeling, experiencing intuiting, and responding to incentives to hyper consume.

    And some of us are willing to let you turn your cities into dysgenic favelas.

    Which is what we plan to let you do.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:55:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227350537844248577

    Reply addressees: @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227350146196942849

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 7) So if you want to feel harmony in suicide and bring about another dark age of ignorance, this time with social construction of the myth of possible equality,the only result of which will be dysgenia and decline – we are fine with it.
    But you can’t take the rest of us with you.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227350146196942849

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 7) So if you want to feel harmony in suicide and bring about another dark age of ignorance, this time with social construction of the myth of possible equality,the only result of which will be dysgenia and decline – we are fine with it.
    But you can’t take the rest of us with you.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227350146196942849

  • 7) So if you want to feel harmony in suicide and bring about another dark age of

    7) So if you want to feel harmony in suicide and bring about another dark age of ignorance, this time with social construction of the myth of possible equality,the only result of which will be dysgenia and decline – we are fine with it.
    But you can’t take the rest of us with you.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:54:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227350146196942849

    Reply addressees: @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227349818911186945

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little agency. And if you did, and you had knowledge, you would know that the female strategy is dysgenic,the left’s strategy is dysgenic, and standard of living is dependent on the center of the distribution.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227349818911186945

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little agency. And if you did, and you had knowledge, you would know that the female strategy is dysgenic,the left’s strategy is dysgenic, and standard of living is dependent on the center of the distribution.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227349818911186945

  • 6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little ag

    6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little agency. And if you did, and you had knowledge, you would know that the female strategy is dysgenic,the left’s strategy is dysgenic, and standard of living is dependent on the center of the distribution.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:52:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227349818911186945

    Reply addressees: @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227349456795906051

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 5) We know that at present we are wealthy enough to want to diverge by the female, empathic, equalitarian, consumptive, infantilized, and underdeveloped strategy and some by the male, analytic, hierarchical, capitalizing, and mature strategy. And so we must separate or civil war.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227349456795906051

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 5) We know that at present we are wealthy enough to want to diverge by the female, empathic, equalitarian, consumptive, infantilized, and underdeveloped strategy and some by the male, analytic, hierarchical, capitalizing, and mature strategy. And so we must separate or civil war.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227349456795906051

  • 5) We know that at present we are wealthy enough to want to diverge by the femal

    5) We know that at present we are wealthy enough to want to diverge by the female, empathic, equalitarian, consumptive, infantilized, and underdeveloped strategy and some by the male, analytic, hierarchical, capitalizing, and mature strategy. And so we must separate or civil war.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:51:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227349456795906051

    Reply addressees: @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227349057582108673

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 4) We know that each of us is born with a bias in female (lateral breadth) vs male(longitudinal velocity) brain structures, and that the stereotype of male analytic and female empathic is physical construction, and that given freedom to do so we pursue interests fitting our bias.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227349057582108673

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 4) We know that each of us is born with a bias in female (lateral breadth) vs male(longitudinal velocity) brain structures, and that the stereotype of male analytic and female empathic is physical construction, and that given freedom to do so we pursue interests fitting our bias.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227349057582108673

  • 4) We know that each of us is born with a bias in female (lateral breadth) vs ma

    4) We know that each of us is born with a bias in female (lateral breadth) vs male(longitudinal velocity) brain structures, and that the stereotype of male analytic and female empathic is physical construction, and that given freedom to do so we pursue interests fitting our bias.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:49:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227349057582108673

    Reply addressees: @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227348388431179776

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 3) We know that moral biases reflect female (herd, infant-equality, devotion, consumption) strategy and the male (pack, mature-hierarchy, loyalty, capitalization) instinct and that females use social superpredation by undermining, and males political superpredation by violence.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227348388431179776

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 3) We know that moral biases reflect female (herd, infant-equality, devotion, consumption) strategy and the male (pack, mature-hierarchy, loyalty, capitalization) instinct and that females use social superpredation by undermining, and males political superpredation by violence.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227348388431179776

  • 3) We know that moral biases reflect female (herd, infant-equality, devotion, co

    3) We know that moral biases reflect female (herd, infant-equality, devotion, consumption) strategy and the male (pack, mature-hierarchy, loyalty, capitalization) instinct and that females use social superpredation by undermining, and males political superpredation by violence.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:47:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227348388431179776

    Reply addressees: @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227347715895549953

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 2) We know that class is genetic, with lower classes accumulating more loads (defects), upper middle the fewest, and aside from noble families, the upper classes random lottery results from the middle – but otherwise there is little to no class rotation.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227347715895549953

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @EricVBailey @Dangerangel @NoahRevoy 2) We know that class is genetic, with lower classes accumulating more loads (defects), upper middle the fewest, and aside from noble families, the upper classes random lottery results from the middle – but otherwise there is little to no class rotation.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1227347715895549953