So then philosophy is complete and that which we call spirituality, mysticism , myth and literature is in the domain of aesthetics: experience.
That is one of the problems I wanted to solve.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-22 06:45:00 UTC
So then philosophy is complete and that which we call spirituality, mysticism , myth and literature is in the domain of aesthetics: experience.
That is one of the problems I wanted to solve.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-22 06:45:00 UTC
TESTIMONIALISM CHANGES THE MEANING OF LYING – THROUGH INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION
You see, I’ve changed the meaning of ‘liar’ from one who intends to deceive, to one who deceives regardless of intent, because he fails to perform due diligence against error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion and deceit.
This means the authors of lies and those who perpetuate those lies, are both equally accountable liars. And we remove the absolution of intent from the ignorant and wishful thinker.
We expand the law to address the new technology of lying. We continue our never ending question to limit the difference between the technology of predation and the technology of law, by the incremental suppression of parasitism under the common law of property.
No more free riding by the left.
The left is a kleptocracy of lies.
Punish the wicked.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-22 04:08:00 UTC
PHILOSOPHY IS FINISHED. THE REST IS LITERATURE, MYTH, AND RELIGION
Interesting. Reading top philosopher’s lists.
Advocates of philosophy conflate the impactful, the useful and the true. In retrospect we can see those who were meaningful (Aristotle, Bacon, Descartes, Hume, Locke, Jefferson.)
As far as I can tell, in retrospect, the problem all philosophers faced was that they were powerless observers, largely writing literature.
They feared, sought to entice, or sought to leverage, from either the church, the state, or their peers.
All the while, rulers ruled, merchants traded, and priests taught. These men only wrote. A few of them matter for the good. Most of them create as much or more harm than good.
1) The only physical science is what we call physics (engineering).
2) The only social science is what we call law(cooperation).
3) The only philosophy testimony(truth).
4) The only experiential science is aesthetics(experience).
Because these three things require action: existence.
1) Action vs reaction in the physical universe. (engineering)
2) Action vs reaction in the cooperative population (ethics/economics, sociology/politics)
3) Action vs reaction in personal testimony. (truth/psychology)
4) Acton vs reaction in experience (aesthetics)
**[Aesthetics], Engineering, Law(cooperation), Testimony**
All disciplines fall within these three fields.
This is the New Trivium.
Testimony (the logics / ourselves)
Law (cooperation / others)
Engineering (the hard sciences / the universe)
[Aesthetics (the science of experiences)]
The rest is fantasy literature, religion, propaganda, and lies.
Seriously.
That’s all there is.
Nothing more. The rest is nonsense dreams are made of.
Philosophy is finished.
Only Science remains.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-21 07:36:00 UTC
(this post is under construction for use in teaching propertarianism)
(We want to teach amoral language so that we can avoid deceit. propertarianism then extends Testimonialism: truth telling.)
COMMUNICATION
Transfer of properties by analogy culminating in the transfer of experience (meaning) by the process of “suggestion”.
The process of creating shared experiences using symbols – primarily language.
TRUTH
(reconstruction of same experience)
(where the experience corresponds to reality)
FALSEHOOD
Imagination
Error
Bias
Wishful Thinking
Obscurantism
Suggestion
Deceit
SUGGESTION
Loading
Framing
Shaming
Rallying
Chanting
Overloading
OVERLOADING
Mysticism/Supernaturalism
Narrative/Literature
Rationalism/Verbalism
Pseudoscience/Innumeracy
UNLOADING
Truthfulness
TRUTHFULNESS
Due diligence that we have not engaged in deception, or error, bias, wishful thinking, obscurantism, suggestion, and deceit.
DUE DILIGENCE
We perform due diligence by testing every dimension of knowledge we know how to. (just as we have different mathematics for each of the increasing dimensions):
Identity and Category
Internal Consistency (logic)
External Correspondence (empirical consistency)
Existential Possibility (operational definitions)
Parsimony, Limits, Full Accounting (limits)
Morality (Productive, Fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to externality of the same.)
KNOWLEDGE
There is only one sequence to knowledge, and all others are false:
Perception(observation) -> Free Association(awareness) -> Hypothesis(guess) -> Theory(Due Diligence) -> Law(Survival) -> Tautology(identity/name) -OR- False
Knowledge is not a qualifier as some pretend, nor does it or can it convey truth content. It is anything in any state of the process of knowledge evolution that we can observe, are aware of, imagine possible, seems consistent, cannot seem to falsify, that is not yet false.
Knowledge: anything that works for the purposes we intend and we cannot yet deem false.
SCIENCE
Science = Truth telling. While we cannot know if we speak the most parsimonious truth, or whether we speak the truth, what we can do
THE ECONOMICS OF TRANSFERRING EXPERIENCES
(we use scientific language because it imposes the lowest cost of truth testing upon the audience. we avoid scientific language because we wish to impose costs upon the audience. We embrace unscientific language when we want to deceive.)
THE CREATIVITY OF MEANING AND THE CRITICISM OF TRUTH
(two part process: 1-transfer meaning, 2-test for truth – Reverse, Obverse)
WARRANTY
(skin in the game)
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-21 03:58:00 UTC
Wishful thinking is the eighth deadly sin.
The church was built of this sin.
The Academy is predicated upon this sin.
We have committed suicide by this sin.
No wishful thinking. Act.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 13:01:00 UTC
Science: discipline we use to launder error, bias, wishful thinking, and deceit from our testimony (speech).
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-19 19:16:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711270228370575360
Reply addressees: @JeBroo5 @JonHaidt @sapinker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711263869188988928
IN REPLY TO:
@JeBroo5
@curtdoolittle @JonHaidt @sapinker of science were truth, we wouldn’t have disagreement in it (but we do). Science is a tool to reach truth
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711263869188988928
Blame Kant. He reinvented mysticism using language. The secret of the west is truth. No one else discovered it
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-19 18:50:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711263626368327681
Reply addressees: @JeBroo5 @JonHaidt @sapinker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711261900999364608
IN REPLY TO:
@JeBroo5
@curtdoolittle @JonHaidt @sapinker fair enough. No mention of Nietzsche! Perhaps he might have echoed your thoughts? Even Freud?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711261900999364608
I view Nietzsche and Freud as the equivalent of science fiction. It’s literature. It’s not truth(science).
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-19 18:49:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711263340409004033
Reply addressees: @JeBroo5 @JonHaidt @sapinker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711261900999364608
IN REPLY TO:
@JeBroo5
@curtdoolittle @JonHaidt @sapinker fair enough. No mention of Nietzsche! Perhaps he might have echoed your thoughts? Even Freud?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711261900999364608
No Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, Marx, Rawls, postmodern lying, eastern mysticism, or pseudoscience required.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-19 18:33:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711259321884135424
Reply addressees: @JeBroo5 @JonHaidt @sapinker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711243673003028481
IN REPLY TO:
@JeBroo5
@curtdoolittle @JonHaidt @sapinker then comes Hobbes and the Leviathan to the “rescue”…
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711243673003028481
Theory: the empirical social sciences are natural/ common law, institutional economics, group evolutionary strategy.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-19 11:29:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711152726785265664
Reply addressees: @JonHaidt @sapinker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711150124861362176
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@JonHaidt @sapinker Sadly, the distribution of philosophers is worse than that of psychologists prior to Operationism. For the same reason.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/711150124861362176
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@JonHaidt @sapinker Sadly, the distribution of philosophers is worse than that of psychologists prior to Operationism. For the same reason.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/711150124861362176