Category: Epistemology and Method
-
Hierarchy of Knowledge – Two Views of Same Conclusion
THE NEW HIERARCHY OF KNOWLEDGE0) Physics (Existence)1) … Time, Man, Action (old Metaphysics – Limits)2) … … Acquisitionism (old Psychology)3) … … … Testimony (old Epistemology) – “Science”)4) … … … … Ethics (old Sociology)5) … … … … … Production (Old economics)6) … … … … … … Commons (Old Politics)7) … … … … … … … Group Evolutionary Strategy (old War)8) … … … … … … … … Aesthetics (that which is ‘true, good, beautiful)Or we could group it this way:THE NEW HIERARCHY OF KNOWLEDGE: Limits and Oppys0) … Physics (Existence)… … … Physics,… … … chemistry,… … … biology,… … … sentience1) … Time, Man, Action (old Metaphysics – Limits)… … … Acquisitionism (old Psychology)… … … Cooperation (old Sociology)… … … … Reproduction (marriage/family)… … … … Education… … … … Production (Old economics)… … … … Commons (Old Politics)… … … … Group Evolutionary Strategy (War)… … … … … Testimony (old Epistemology) – “Science”) And the second way appears to be better. -
Oh, I dont bear truth, I bear methods of deconflation. 😉
Oh, I dont bear truth, I bear methods of deconflation. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-17 13:48:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853968459952263169
Reply addressees: @mcmaz1ng @JayMan471 @primalpoly
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853950076439474178
IN REPLY TO:
@Its_Lynnocent
@curtdoolittle @JayMan471 @gmiller If it was so easy to “deconflate” oh wise truth bearer then explain why do we still live in a world divided and ruled by ideology?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853950076439474178
-
You cannot trust what you cannot measure. If you cannot measure it you are actin
You cannot trust what you cannot measure. If you cannot measure it you are acting not on trust but on faith. And faith is not a way to govern, but a way to hide the extraction of rents before the opportunity is lost.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-17 12:29:00 UTC
-
THE NEW HIERARCHY OF KNOWLEDGE 0) Physics (Existence) 1) … Time, Man, Action (
THE NEW HIERARCHY OF KNOWLEDGE
0) Physics (Existence)
1) … Time, Man, Action (old Metaphysics – Limits)
2) … … Acquisitionism (old Psychology)
3) … … … Testimony (old Epistemology) – “Science”)
4) … … … … Ethics (old Sociology)
5) … … … … … Production (Old economics)
6) … … … … … … Commons (Old Politics)
7) … … … … … … … Group Evolutionary Strategy (old War)
8) … … … … … … … … Aesthetics (that which is ‘true, good, beautiful)
Or we could group it this way:
THE NEW HIERARCHY OF KNOWLEDGE: Limits and Oppys
0) … Physics (Existence)
… … … Physics,
… … … chemistry,
… … … biology,
… … … sentience
1) … Time, Man, Action (old Metaphysics – Limits)
… … … Acquisitionism (old Psychology)
… … … Cooperation (old Sociology)
… … … … Reproduction (marriage/family)
… … … … Education
… … … … Production (Old economics)
… … … … Commons (Old Politics)
… … … … Group Evolutionary Strategy (War)
… … … … … Testimony (old Epistemology) – “Science”)
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-17 12:24:00 UTC
-
One man’s good is another man’s bad. Truth in argument however is ascertainable,
One man’s good is another man’s bad. Truth in argument however is ascertainable, at least so far, as that it is possible to make a claim.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-16 19:57:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853698889668591616
Reply addressees: @JayMan471 @primalpoly
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853618034610778114
IN REPLY TO:
@JayMan471
.@curtdoolittle I’m a free speech purist so this argument won’t go far. One man’s falsehood is another’s truth. @gmiller
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853618034610778114
-
There is zero reason we cannot require warranty of due diligence against error,
There is zero reason we cannot require warranty of due diligence against error, bias,wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism + deceit.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-16 18:36:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853678615086714881
Reply addressees: @mcmaz1ng @primalpoly @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853624836094140416
IN REPLY TO:
@Its_Lynnocent
@curtdoolittle @gmiller @JayMan471 Who is going to decide who is using true or false speech? The right? The left? Bad idea mate.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853624836094140416
-
I always wonder…. why is it that people think they know what theyre talking ab
I always wonder…. why is it that people think they know what theyre talking about, rather than know only what is norative?
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-16 18:35:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853678352158396416
Reply addressees: @mcmaz1ng @primalpoly @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853624836094140416
IN REPLY TO:
@Its_Lynnocent
@curtdoolittle @gmiller @JayMan471 Who is going to decide who is using true or false speech? The right? The left? Bad idea mate.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853624836094140416
-
I cannot necessarily get your attention long enough to get you from A to B. What
I cannot necessarily get your attention long enough to get you from A to B. What I can do is attack the comforting alternatives that you rely upon in order to maintain your fallacious faith in A until only B remains.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-16 14:41:00 UTC
-
And it will provide as great a set of returns as has empiricism. If not more
And it will provide as great a set of returns as has empiricism. If not more.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-16 14:03:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853609874386821120
Reply addressees: @JayMan471 @primalpoly
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853575968040026112
IN REPLY TO:
@JayMan471
@curtdoolittle @gmiller This is impossible to implement.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853575968040026112
-
And it will serve as the completion of the scientific enlightenment that we have
And it will serve as the completion of the scientific enlightenment that we have struggled and failed to perform for centuries.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-16 14:03:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853609763757846528
Reply addressees: @JayMan471 @primalpoly
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853575968040026112
IN REPLY TO:
@JayMan471
@curtdoolittle @gmiller This is impossible to implement.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/853575968040026112